Kaal Bhairav

R.A.W.: An Instrument of Indian Imperialism

2011-10-18T10:06:00.000+05:45

India's intelligence agency Research and Analysis Wing (R.A.W.), created in 1968, has assumed a significant status in the formulation of the country's domestic and foreign policies, particularly the latter. Working directly under the prime minister, it has over the years become an effective instrument of India's national power. In consonance with Kautilya's precepts, R.A.W.'s espionage doctrine is based on the principle of waging a continuous series of battles of intrigues and secret wars. (Kautilya, or more popularly, Chânakya, was an ancient Indian political theorist.)

Since its creation, R.A.W. has been a vital, though unobtrusive, actor in the Indian policy-making apparatus. But it is the massive international dimensions of R.A.W. operations that merit a closer examination. To the credit of this organization, it has in a very short span of time mastered the art of spy warfare. Credit must go to Indira Gandhi who in the late 1970's gave it a changed and much more dynamic role. To suit her much publicized Indira Doctrine (India Doctrine), Gandhi specifically asked R.A.W. to create a powerful organ within the organization that could undertake covert operations in neighboring countries. It is this capability that makes R.A.W. a more fearsome agency than the superior K.G.B., C.I.A., M.I.6, B.N.D., or Mossad.

Its internal role is confined only to monitoring events that have a bearing on the external threat. R.A.W.'s boss works directly under the prime minister. An Additional secretary to the government of India, under the director of R.A.W., is responsible for the Office of Special Operations, intelligence collected from different countries, internal security (under the director general of security), the electronic/technical section, and general administration. The additional secretary as well as the director general of security is also under the director of R.A.W. The director of security has two important sections: the Aviation Research Center and the Special Services Bureau. The joint director has specified desks with different regional divisions/areas (countries): area one, Pakistan; area two, China and Southeast Asia; area three, the Middle East and Africa; and area four, other countries.

Movement of RAW in Nepal

2011-08-29T01:04:00.000+05:45

At the time when local newspapers, political leaders, intellectuals, among others, are talking about the active presence of Indians while destabilizing our politics as well as the economy, thus making defunct one after another institutions, Pant has brought out the publication “Nepalma RAW Ko Chalkhel (Movement of RAW in Nepal).

There are many questions yet to be answered. Just look at the current issues: Why the Royal Palace massacre took place immediately after the late King’s China visit? Why the parliament passed the finance bill in a disguised manner? Was King Birendra’s decision to consult the Supreme Court before giving Royal assent on a controversial bill the reason for the Royal Palace bloodbath? Why Indian political leaders put pressure on the marriage of the then Crown Prince Dipendra? How could the Maoists get safe shelter in
Indian territory? How did they get arms from India? Why the five political parties are launching a “joint-movement” at the time when the Maoists have announced cease fire? Why the political parties are trying to limit the Royal Palace role as well as the Army affairs? Why KV Rajans are here at the time of change of the government? After all, who are running such games from behind the scene?

One may get some answers to the above questions while reading the book “Movement of RAW in Nepal”.It is strongly assumed that the Indian intelligence unit is actively involved in manipulating newspapers, intellectuals, political leaders making them supporters of India. The fact is that leaders of major political
parties do not speak about the Kalapani issue, the India constructed embankments inundating Nepalese fertile soil, border encroachment by the Indians, among others.

It is very much interesting to note that Nepal has no problem with our neighbouring country China whereas we are facing countless problems with India, either it is in the operation of the dry-port in Birgunj or export of ghee, beer etc..While giving the background, the publication explains about RAW activities
while creating Bangladesh from Pakistan, RAW activities in Bhutan, Maldives, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Sikkim annexation.

The main objective of the RAW is to create internal trouble in neighbouring countries and take benefit from the trouble that the neighbouring countries face. That apart, their present interest towards Nepal is to fail the Nepalese economy and create monopoly in the Nepalese market. India is showing double-standards towards Nepal. On the one hand the Indian government is supporting our government with arms on the other the RAW is supporting the Maoists.

RAW, a powerful Indian intelligence – Research Analysis Wing – ultimately aims to defunct Nepal.The publication has cited on Nepal-India government level relations,relations of political parties and people of the two countries, and Nepal’s relations with RAW.The publication has also referred to the RAW intention and expectations in Nepal.

RAW involvement in border encroachment and intervention, water politics of RAW, security concern of RAW have been described in the publication.The author has referred different books as well as a series of articles
published in different newspapers, magazines.It is essential for the Nepalese to know about the RAW activities and understand the origin of current problems by reading the publication.

At the time when it has become difficult to search out intellectuals dedicated towards the motherland, Dr. Pant appears as a personality who has the courage to unmask the RAW grand design in Nepal.
By bringing out the publication, the author has done a commendable job.Concerned sectors need to be timely alerted from the RAW design upon Nepal as described by Dr. Pant.

Authored and published by: Dr. Shastra Dutta Pant, Institute of Rural
Development:
First edition: April 2003
Printed by: United Graphics Printers P. Ltd., New Plaza, Ramshah Path,
Kathmandu.
Price: Rs. 194.00.

Source:[http://www.yomari.com/p-review/2003/06/19062003/book.html]

WikiLeaks: India accepts funding Nepal Maoists to gain favor

2011-06-28T09:54:00.000+05:45

At a meeting held between the Indian Foreign Secretary Nirupama Rao and a high ranking US official, Richard Holbrooke January 18, 2010, the Indian foreign secretary during a two hour long working breakfast had accepted that Indian establishment had funded the Maoists’ rebellion in Nepal and that eventually became counterproductive to India.

WikiLeaks has revealed that the US special representative to Pakistan and Afghanistan Richard Holbrooke was told by the Indian Foreign Secretary Nirupama Rao that the strategy to fund Taliban Militants to gain their favor would see similar fate to that of India’s strategy in having funded the Maoists in Nepal.

The detail of the Rao-Holbrooke conversation was later forwarded by the US ambassador in New Delhi to the US government that the WikiLeaks has made public.

India thus stands exposed.

More such revelations are awaited which will shed light on how Nepal-India relations took a nose dive during the Royal regime.

In the meantime, the Unified Maoists’ Party spokesperson Dina Nath Sharma talking to Kantipur Daily dated December 4, 2010, refuting the allegation says, “There is no truth that we had received financial support from India.”

“We held discussions on political matters…they asked us to reject the presence of UNMIN….they said they will support us…but, we favored the UN, thus UNMIN is right here”.

“Yes, to lure others by making various lucrative offers has become the hallmark of Indian tradition”, he says and adds “We rejected their offer.”

Sharma also advises the Indian establishment to seek political solution-not technical solutions, to problems in Jammu/Kashmir, Pakistan, Bangladesh and Nepal.

However, Sharma doesn’t deny that they were not having intimate contacts with the Indian regime.

WikiLeaks first jolt. The earth is yet to shake.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Excerpts of the Document follows:

Thursday, 28 January 2010, 13:20

C O N F I D E N T I A L SECTION 01 OF 04 NEW DELHI 000163

SIPDIS

EO 12958 DECL: 01/18/2020

TAGS PREL, PGOV, PK, AF, IN

SUBJECT: SRAP HOLBROOKE DISCUSSES AFGHANISTAN AND PAKISTAN WITH INDIAN FOREIGN SECRETARY RAO

Classified By: Ambassador Timothy J. Roemer. Reasons: 1.4(B, D).

9. (C) Rao and Sinha raised grave concerns about Taliban reintegration plans currently under discussion. Sinha argued that no amount of monetary incentives would induce the Taliban to alter its core beliefs of intolerance and militancy. He was particularly troubled by the British plan which, in his view, takes Afghanistan back to the pre-1990s. Rao expressed skepticism that such a plan would work unless Pakistan changes its policy on supporting the Quetta Shura and other Taliban elements. She observed that it had failed to bring in the Maoists in Nepal and was likely to fail for similar reasons in Afghanistan.
@Telegraph Nepal
UNCP Maoist Secretary C. P. Gajurel already challenged India to give proof its funding Nepal Maoist.

Book claims Indian role in Nepal palace massacre

2011-05-11T01:58:00.001+05:45

Kathmandu: A former senior military officer at Nepal's royal palace, who drew flak for the massacre of King Birendra and nine others in 2001, is now rattling new skeletons with his memoir.

Gen. Bibek Shah, who rose from being the aide de camp of the king to becoming military secretary in the Narayanhity royal palace in Kathmandu, has opened a can of worms with his book, "Maile dekheko darbar" (The court as I saw it).

The 599-page book, the author says, is based on his dairy and observations, especially during the nearly four years that he served as military secretary, first to King Birendra and then, to his successor, King Gyanendra.

Shah says King Birendra, though a constitutional king, wanted to modernise the army and was seeking to buy "ultra modern" firearms. The king, who was also the supreme commander of the army, had reached an agreement with German gun manufacturer Heckler and Koch to procure their G36 assault rifles.

Plans had also been made to assemble the weapons in Nepal and sell them in South Asia.

But Shah says the plan was anathema to India, since the bigger neighbour did not want Nepal to possess better arms and was pressuring it to buy its indigenous Insas group of firearms that were inferior in quality.

"I think the arms politics could be one of the major reasons behind the palace massacre," Shah says.

The other reason, he writes, could be the issue of granting citizenship to residents of the Terai plains, many of whom are of Indian origin.

Parliament was ready to confer citizenship on the community and had forwarded the bill to the king for his seal of approval.

However, King Birendra, instead of passing the bill, sent it to the Supreme Court for consideration and the apex court nixed it.

"Had the king put his seal of approval, within a few years Nepalis could have become a minority in Nepal," the former aide writes. "After the bill was scrapped, a few senior Indian government officials expressed concern to the king."
Shah says that he was given a top secret file by the king, outlining Operation Eagle, a plan to resolve the growing Maoist insurgency.

Apparently, King Birendra was planning to seize power, start talks with the underground Maoists, concede some of their demands and bring them back to mainstream politics. For that, he had been sending his younger brother, Prince Dhirendra, and a senior army official as his emissaries to talk with the Maoist leadership.
"At a time such a serious plan was being developed to resolve the crisis gripping the state, the palace massacre occurred mysteriously," he writes. "My analysis and conclusion is that internal as well as foreign forces were involved."

Though Shah asserted during a televised interview that the actual killings were done by Birendra's son Dipendra, he says the crown prince, already smarting under his mother's tight rein, was incited by foreign forces.
While the government formed a commission to investigate the actual shooting June 1, 2001, it did not go beyond that to investigate the motive or the abettors.
As a democracy, India wanted monarchy in Nepal to end and so joined forces with Nepal's Maoist guerrillas, who also wanted the abolition of the crown.
Shah says given the meetings held between Nepal's political party leaders and the Maoists in India, it was inconceivable that the Indian intelligence agencies did not know about them.
Besides supporting these meets, he says India actively trained Nepal's Maoist guerrillas. He claims the cat was let out of the bag when an armed police force team went to Chakrata in India's Uttarakhand state to receive arms training from the Indian authorities and learned that an earlier group, apparently Maoists, had also been trained there.
When he tried to investigate, Shah claims he was told by then King Gyanendra to resign under Indian pressure.
I strongly object to the use of word 'Harmad', it's a word used by TMC, you can't use the word without knowing the meaning
Expressed shock that HM's letter reached media first. 32 TMC workers killed, CPM has lost 69 cadres.

All parties except TMC have helped us in tackling TMCV.

Indian double-dealing in Nepal: Reveals Wikileaks

2011-04-18T04:48:00.000+05:45

The fresh set of classified US Embassy diplomatic cable put out by Wikileaks, reveals conversation between the then US ambassador Michael Malinowski and Indian Ambassador Shyam Saran.

The cable dates back to December 4, 2003.

During the conversation between the two, US ambassador complains that intelligence operatives at the Indian Embassy in Kathmandu have been characterizing the US government policy and motives in Nepal as malevolently aimed at undermining Nepal’s sovereignty.

Malinowski says that the US Embassy had been passed the information by several Nepali political sources, who claimed to have had such conversations in the recent past with Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) agents based at the Indian Embassy.

After the conversation providing his comments Malinowski writes, “We cannot discount the possibility that our Nepali sources, many of whom resent India’s influence in their country, may have their own motives in conveying to us reports of Indian double-dealing...we have always found Saran professional, collegial, and cooperative, and believe that he does not sanction–and may probably not be aware of–all of RAW’s activities in Nepal”.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Text Follows:

Created: 2003-12-04 02:02

Released: 2011-03-15 00:12

Classification: SECRET//NOFORN

Origin: Embassy Kathmandu

Wikileaks notice: This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.

S E C R E T KATHMANDU 002366

SIPDIS

NOFORN

STATE FOR SA/INS

E.O. 12958: DECL: 12/03/2013
TAGS: PREL PTER NP IN
SUBJECT: NEPAL: AMBASSADOR RELAYS CONCERNS ABOUT
ACTIVITIES OF INDIAN INTELLIGENCE AGENTS

REF: A. REF: KATHMANDU 2282
B. KATHMANDU 2298

Classified By: AMB. MICHAEL E. MALINOWSKI. REASON: 1.5 (B,D).

1. (S/NF) On December 3 the Ambassador raised with Indian Ambassador Shyam Saran reports that intelligence agents assigned to the Indian Embassy in Kathmandu have been characterizing USG policy and motives in Nepal as malevolently aimed at undermining Nepal’s sovereignty. The Ambassador told Saran that the reports had been passed to us by several Nepali political sources, who claimed to have had such conversations in the recent past with Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) agents based at the Indian Embassy. He also briefed Saran about unsubstantiated reports suggesting that some Nepali Maoist women may have received training at a security facility in Dehra Dun in northern India (Ref A). Noting that Nepalis, both within the government and in the opposition, sometimes attempt to play off Indian and American interests, he stressed that the information passed on by these sources had not been verified. He noted that the reports predated the meeting between Nepali Maoists and Communist Party of Nepal – United Marxist Leninist General Secretary Madhav Nepal in Lucknow (Ref B)–an event that has SIPDIS set Nepali nationalists teeth on edge against India. The Ambassador emphasized that he was communicating these concerns to Saran as a friend and ally.

2. (S/NF) Ambassador Saran thanked him and expressed concern, describing the reports as ”unfortunate” and not an accurate reflection of official GOI policy–a point confirmed in his recent policy discussions in New Delhi (see para 3). The GOI is committed to ensuring Nepal’s stability, he said, adding that he has obtained unprecedented levels of development and security assistance for the kingdom. Nonetheless, sometimes people in different branches of the GOI “go off on their own,”" he acknowledged, and promised to look into the reports.

3. (S/NF) In a separate meeting on November 30, Saran briefed the Ambassador on the just-concluded policy deliberations in New Delhi. He stressed that his interlocutors had expressed concern about possible spill-over of the insurgency onto Indian Territory. According to Saran, Indian Defense Minister George Fernandes told him that “the fight against the Maoists is also India’s fight.” Saran noted, however, that certain quarters within the GOI had argued that India should maintain contact with the Maoists in order to influence them and to keep open communication channels in the event of a worst-case scenario in which the Maoists ultimately gain power.

4. (S/NF) We cannot discount the possibility that our Nepali sources, many of whom resent India’s influence in their country, may have their own motives in conveying to us reports of Indian double-dealing. We have always found Saran professional, collegial, and cooperative, and believe that he does not sanction–and may probably not be aware of–all of RAW’s activities in Nepal. His acknowledgement that some in the GOI ”go off on their own” and that some advocate maintaining contact and influence with the Maoists is his first admission to us that some elements within his Embassy may be working at cross-purposes to official GOI policy.

India’s strategic role in Nepal

2011-03-17T05:44:00.000+05:45

March 18, 2011 9:34:11 AM

Ashok K Mehta

Madhav Kumar Nepal, when general secretary of the Communist Party of Nepal (United Marxist-Leninist) was invited to Delhi in 2007 by the Ministry of External Affairs as part of its outreach diplomacy. He told a Delhi-based newspaper that Prime Minister Manmohan Singh had counselled strengthening unity among democratic forces, adding “you have the Maoists on board now, that’s a big advantage”. Mr Nepal, back as Prime Minister, will ask Mr Singh to help get the Maoists to join his Government.

India’s backing for his Government is crucial to its strategy of buying time to tame the Maoists as it made a colossal error of judgement in writing off the Maoists in the elections to the Constituent Assembly in which they won more seats than the Nepali Congress and CPN(UML) put together. Worse, National Security Adviser MK Narayanan said that India was “used to working with the Nepali Congress”. Their electoral performance was the decisive turning point in the peace process.

Emboldened by their success and confident of leading the Government till the new Constitution was drafted, the Maoists bungled when their charismatic leader, Mr Pushpa Kamal Dahal, better known as Prachanda, egged on by party hardliners, dismissed the Chief of Army Staff, Gen Rukmangad Katwal, who was seen to be blocking the Maoist grand plan of dominating all state institutions, including the Army, by resisting the integration of Maoist combatants with the forces, the only organisation not under its domination. President Ram Baran Yadav restoring the COAS was seen by the Maoists as violation of civilian supremacy and reason for Prachanda to resign. In their book, civilian supremacy is tight party control of the Army, the power flowing from the barrel of the gun.

Prachanda’s plans for a ‘new’ Nepal and a socioeconomic revolution went awry when the Maoists crossed the ‘Lakshman Rekha’. How can they change ‘old’ Nepal into ‘new’ Nepal without first changing themselves, is the common refrain. Sacking Gen Katwal, a monumental miscalculation which cost them the Government, was the second turning point of the peace process, ending the period of consensus. Maoist relations with other political parties, the Army and India are the worst ever.

Shock and insecurity at losing power in the name of civilian supremacy has spilled on to the streets and in the Constituent Assembly. Prachanda has vowed that the Maoists will soon return to lead a new national unity Government. It is against this skewed balance of power where the Maoists, the single largest party, are on the streets instead of in the House, that Mr Nepal is in Delhi.

Mr Nepal’s Government requires India’s demonstrable support for its legitimacy and restoring the peace process. In his book, Raj Lives On — India in Nepal, Sanjay Upadhyaya has observed that no one can rule in Nepal without India’s nod and recognising its legitimate security interests. The Maoists apparently don’t think so. They are advocating ‘Looking Beyond India’, accommodating a more assertive China to balance India. Chinese political, military, economic and diplomatic activities and people-to-people contact in Nepal have increased dramatically during the Maoist interregnum.

Through one of their key military leaders, Barsaman Pun (Ananta), the Maoists have indicated that the present standoff can be resolved only on their terms. He says Mr Yadav’s action restoring the sacked Chief of Army Staff is only part of the problem. The Pun panacea prescribes correction of the President’s action through a debate in the House, a new comprehensive peace agreement followed by a Maoist-led national Government.

The longevity of the Nepal Government is irrelevant to the peace process unless there is improvement in the law and order situation, progress in drafting the Constitution and integrating the armies. The new Government has to demonstrate it can govern better than the inexperienced guerrillas-turned-politicians. The Army Integration Special Committee is stuck over the question of its chairmanship — Prachanda, Maoists say, was replaced by Mr Nepal without consulting them. Constitution-drafting is marking time.

The Maoists are sulking and still cannot be trusted over their commitment to rule of law, multi-party democracy and human rights — in short, they have failed to transform from a guerrilla force into a political outfit. They remain on the US Terrorist Exclusion List and according to former US Ambassador Nancy Powell, the Young Communist League has obstructed Constitution-writing. India, the architect of the historic 2005 Delhi Accord which axed monarchy, is following the US way: Judge the Maoists by their deeds and not words.

Maoist-India relations have plummeted with Prachanda accusing India of installing a puppet regime, even plotting with the US to attack China. High-decibel anti-India sentiment draped in nationalism is being whipped up which is nothing new for Delhi.

Charges of Indian interference and anti-Indianism have to be managed, sometimes ignored.

Clearly, things will get worse before they get better. Mr Nepal cannot perform effectively without the Maoists on board the peace process which is linked with the United Nations Mission in Nepal on its fourth extension, overseeing the integration of armies. India has lost ground in Nepal and Sri Lanka by neglect of the neighbourhood. Given Nepal’s location, it is crucial to the security of the strategic Indo-Gangetic plains. Equally, reaching out to the Maoists and reducing the trust deficit are pivotal.

While Mr Nepal can be lavished with all the political confidence, economic goodies and assurances of cooperation, these will not operationalise the peace process. Nepalis feel India has a moral duty to break the political impasse. The Maoists require to be placated over civilian supremacy — though CPN(UML) leader KP Oli says their civilian supremacy is with YCL — integration, including restoring Prachanda’s chairmanship of AISC, and other inducements. New red lines have to be drawn over Chinese penetration into Nepal and activities of the YCL as part of a new Delhi Accord.

The Maoists have outlined two options: A Prachanda-led Government or revolt, and have discounted a third option. But there is one: Maoists joining the current Government. This requires to be worked out.

A high-level India-Maoist back-channel dialogue addressing issues holding up the peace process is urgently needed. Another mechanism is required to fix a disturbed Madhes which has around 109 armed groups, many of which simply comprise criminals. Mr Nepal must go back reassured that India has Nepal’s core interests at heart while facilitating a restart of the peace process.

http://www.dailypioneer.com/196694/India%E2%80%99s-strategic-role-in-Nepal.html

Wikileaks Reveals: U.S. Intrigue Against Maoists & Nepal Peace Process

2011-03-16T01:53:00.001+05:45

Posted by Alastair Reith on March 15, 2011

US Ambassador James F. Moriarty

“A Maoist victory would energize leftist insurgencies and threaten stability in the region. It thus behooves us to continue to do everything possible to block such an outcome.”

by Alastair Reith

Diplomatic cables released today show that former US Ambassador James F. Moriarty was actively trying to destabilise Nepal’s peace process in order to prevent a Maoist rise to power. It reveals a bitter man, utterly convinced that the peace process endorsed by the Maoists in 2006 was a temporary ploy to help them advance their revolutionary agenda… and it shows how determined he was to block that process.

This article looks at just one of the cables released today.

On September 22, 2006, the date of this cable, the monarchy had just been toppled in a massive popular uprising, during which the Maoist revolutionaries and the more mainstream and conservative political parties formed an alliance against the dictatorial King and brought him down together. They did not enter this alliance willingly, but when the King banned those mainstream parties and seized absolute power these conservative politicians were forced to turn to the radical communist movement for help.

A deal was struck – the Maoists and the political parties would fight the King together, and after he fell they would form an Interim Government with equal representation for all parties before holding elections for a Constituent Assembly with a mandate to radically transform Nepal. The Maoists agreed to end their armed struggle, signed Peace Accords in November 2006 and put their army on cease fire, and the conservative parties agreed to open the floodgates and begin the restructuring of Nepali society.

At the time of this cable Nepal was locked in a political stalemate and a political vacuum. The King had been defeated on the streets by his own people, and the Maoists were openly walking the streets of Kathmandu for the first time in over a decade. However, it took almost another year of negotiations before an Interim Government could be formed with Maoist participation. We now know at least part of the story behind why this took as long as it did – US imperialism was interfering in Nepal’s political process to try and prevent the Maoists, the most popular political movement in the country, from being included in a government.

U.S. Fear of a Maoist “Path to Power”

Moriarty begins the secret cable by describing the situation as he sees it. He writes;

“It looks like we’re getting to crunch time here in Nepal… the Maoists appear intent on organizing during the month of October massive public demonstrations designed to pressure the GON into putting the Maoists on the path to power. If the government still refuses to cave, the Maoists, according to a number of pretty good sources, seem ready to move in November to a campaign of urban violence, using the demonstrations as cover.”

As the Maoists entered the peace process (and started open political work in Nepal’s urban areas) some leftist forces internationally claimed that by setting aside the armed struggle they were abandoning the goal of revolution. Now we know that the U.S. officials (at least) saw these events through an opposite lens — and feared that a Maoist “path to power” might emerge from the overthrow of the king, the advances to toward democratic political rights and the political mobilization of the people.

In the five years since these cables were written, the Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) (UCPN-M) has remained committed to the peace process it initiated and continued to push for radical change and a people’s constitution using peaceful mobilization of the people. To the frustration of everyone, this process has been locked in a stalemate, where any significant social change and national progress for the people is prevented by the parliamentary parties. And at each point, as the cables note: the Maoists have threatened to move outside the process, to press forward with popular revolutionary demands.

Ambassador Moriarty goes on to analayse the balance of forces;

“The good news is that the Maoists are doing much of this through bluff. They have relatively little popular support, and they have nowhere near the military capability to take on the government’s security services in an open fight.”

This is a somewhat amusing statement to read in retrospect. At the time of the Constituent Assembly elections, the mainstream media and Western governments were all repeating this view over and over again – the Maoists have little popular support, the success of their revolutionary movement has been gained through intimidation and coercion, etc etc. The constant prediction was that the Maoists would come a distant third behind the UML party and the Nepali Congress. As it turns out, these predictions were wrong. The Maoists quickly proved to be the single most popular party in the country to the shock of all reactionary observers, winning a plurality in the popular elections.

At the same time, there is a significant assessment here of relative military capacity: Part of the reason the Maoists decided to participate in the peace process is their difficulty in taking on the Nepal Army “in an open fight” — and their hope to build political support in new ways for future confrontations.

U.S. Intrigue: “What We Need to Do”

The most important part of the cable is without a doubt a section entitled “What We Need to Do”. In this, Ambassador Moriarty outlines a strategy for the USA to prevent the Maoist revolution from succeeding.

The first step in his counter-revolutionary plan is what he calls “brow-beating”.

Moriarty declares;

“Ultimately, decisions made by Nepalis will determine whether this country goes down the path toward becoming a People’s Republic over the next couple of months. That said, we need to increase the possibility that the leaders here will make the right decisions. I’ve been meeting regularly with the Prime Minister, urging him (so far unsuccessfully) to use the police to enforce law and order and bucking him up to stick to his bottom line of not letting gun-toting Maoists into the government (with greater success so far). We’ve also been pushing the other major parties of the Seven Party alliance to support the Prime Minister on arms management and to push him to use the police against Maoist excesses. I’ve also created a firestorm of controversy by visiting a couple of military bases (as well as a lot of civilians) out West and publicly condemning Maoist violence. Leftist MP’s have called for my expulsion, but at least some of the people here are beginning to debate Maoist intentions.”

Here we have proof that the US ambassador was pushing not only for the Maoists to be excluded from government, but also that he was pushing for the police to be mobilised to crack down on the Maoist movement. Such crude intervention in the internal affairs of Nepal is outrageous — and doubly so because it is clearly for the purpose of suppressing the people and their just demands. Behind the scenes, the U.S. was opposing democratic change in Nepal, and wanting to find political forces that could continue the King’s fascistic repression.

The police are hated in Nepali society – systematically corrupt, routinely violent, they stand accused of torture, rape and assassination. In a country where the state completely neglected the people in the rural areas, the local police station was often the only state presence in the area – no hospitals, no schools, just corrupt thugs protecting the landlords and money lenders. During the People’s War of the 1990s one of the first actions taken during a peasant uprising was to attack and destroy the local police station, and by the early 2000s the police had been entirely driven out of huge swathes of the Nepali countryside. To call for them to move against ‘Maoist excesses’ is a call for a continuation of the government’s wartime brutalities.

Continuing in this aggressive theme, Ambassador Moriarty goes on to urge the US government to prepare another massive arms shipment to Nepal. During the period of the People’s War, the US and other Western nations donated weapons to the Royal Nepal Army, even as stories of its brutality leaked out. It shows how the U.S. quickly came to see the Nepal Army as their most reliable instrument and ally in suppressing the revolutionary movement.

Moriarty writes;

“We need to be prepared for the possibility of a Maoist return to violence in November. The key will be to condemn as quickly as possible Maoist violence, while shipping as quickly as possible some 4,500 more weapons that we have in storage for the Nepali Army. Those weapons would have an immediate tactical impact but more importantly would shore up a government that will be under tremendous pressure to capitulate.”

If a violent and repressive force is willing to obey orders, the U.S. is prepared to give them all the guns they need to crush any attempts by their own people to rise up.

The Maoists are not just agrarian reformers

A particularly fascinating section of the cable is one the ambassador entitles “the Diplomatic Game”, in which he details the different approaches taken by the various foreign powers;

“The diplomacy here is getting complicated. The Europeans are all over the map with respect to recent developments. The Danes and Norwegians (who have some clout here because of their aid programs) are convinced that lasting peace is just about ready to break out and push the GON [Government of Nepal] to be as accommodating as possible. The Brits, in contrast, seem convinced that the Maoists will soon be coming into power and are trying to convince themselves that that might not be so bad. The Chinese seem primarily interested in pushing Tibet issues with the weak, frequently ineffectual GON. The local World Bank rep is so fed up with the corruption in the system that he has become a frequent lunch pal of the Maoist supremo. I’m trying to push back here on some of this, but it would help if the Department could have a serious, high-level discussion with the Brits on Nepal. We might also want to look at a demarche to the Europeans and others (reminding them that the Maoists are not just agrarian reformers and seem to want power rather than peace).”

There appear to have been serious divisions between the Americans and their European counterparts both in terms of their analysis of the situation and their proposals on how to deal with it, and it is interesting to note how much more accurate the predictions of the British and the Scandinavians were compared to those of Moriarty and the Americans.

This paragraph clearly reveals that even as the Maoists were engaging with European governments, even as a genuine peace process was beginning to take shape, the American Embassy was doing everything in its power to sabotage the process and find the ways to crush the Maoists and their popular base — even at the cost of reigniting the civil war.

If Nepal’s peace process does fail and some form of conflict or popular revolt does take place in the future, the fault will not lie with the Maoists. They have demonstrated great patience and compromise within this peace process, making great sacrifices – and what we now know is that from the very beginning the USA was trying to derail this.

Hypocrisy lies heaped upon hypocrisy.

The Role of India

This cable, along with the others released today, also sheds light on the role of India in Nepal. Nepal has long been a defacto colony of India, with its politicians, its economy, its military and countless other aspects of its society under near-total Indian domination. A major demand of the Maoist movement is to change this unequal relationship and forge a new one based on equality, Nepali sovereignty and self-determination. The Maoists have long accused India of interfering in Nepal’s political process, and specifically attempting to undermine and sabotage the Maoists. It’s an open secret, but one with very little evidence… until now.

Our site will analyse the other cables soon, which deal in much greater detail with India’s role in stalling the peace process.

For now, we have this excerpt from Moriarty’s cable, in which he reveals the Indian ambassador’s role in preventing the timely formation of an Interim Government and in pushing for a return to police violence;

“From my perspective, we need to do more to keep the Indians in lock-step with us. I coordinate closely with my Indian counterpart here and in private he pushes the exact same message I do: that the police need to enforce law and order and that the GON should not let armed Maoists into an interim government.”

Ambassador Moriarty finishes his cable with a warning. It is, ironically, a statement that this site and the people involved in it fully support and endorse! As popular rebellions and communist insurgencies explode out of an ocean of discontent in South Asia, it is quite understandable that the ruling elites across the world feel concerned and nervous about what a communist revolution in Nepal would lead to. This was weighing on Moriarty’s mind in 2006 as it still surely weighs on the mind of his successor. He declares;

“A Maoist victory would energize leftist insurgencies and threaten stability in the region. It thus behooves us to continue to do everything possible to block such an outcome.”

A Maoist victory would do all of this an more.

In a period of capitalist economic crisis, with falling living standards, rising prices, imperialist war and restriction of civil liberties a reality across the globe, a liberated Nepal entering a process of radical social transformation would be a beacon of hope in the darkness. And in 2011, as the people take to the streets across Africa and the Middle East, all of a sudden the word ‘revolution’ does not seem outdated and idealistic, but modern, concrete, immediate and real. A Maoist victory in Nepal will send shockwaves across the entire globe, and ‘threaten stability’ for the ruling elite in more than just South Asia. However hard the US Embassy tries, it can do nothing to change that.

India strikes again in Nepal, RAW contract killer shoots, injures Yunus Ansari

2011-03-11T10:01:00.000+05:45

SUNDAR KHANAL

KATHMANDU, March 10: In a major breach of security at the country´s largest jail, an Indian man entered with a firearm and shot Yunus Ansari, the controversial 41-year-old media magnate who is in jail on fake currency and drugs charges, on Thursday.

Jasjeet Singh, 42, a self-proclaimed contract killer from Lucknow, India, fired twice with his revolver at point blank range on meeting Ansari at the visitor´s lounge of the Central Jail. One bullet hit Ansari.

Ansari was injured in the left arm and is out of danger after undergoing immediate surgery at Norvic Hospital. Dramatic intervention by security guards prevented further injury.

The incident

Jasajeet Singh entered the Central Jail at around 11:30 a.m., purportedly to meet Charles Sobhraj, the notorious criminal who has been confined to the golghar (special cell with muliple restrictions).

As Singh made his way into the visiting lounge, Ansari was just about to part from his brother Amin Ansari and the latter´s wife. Investigative officials said that Singh fired at Ansari on seeing him, all in a flash.

Singh´s first shot missed. As he was aiming the second shot, a security guard, Bir Bahadur, who was standing with Ansari across the iron bar partition of the visiting room promptly pushed Ansari aside to save him while anther cop, Parmod Chaurasiya, struck Singh´s hand to foil him.

"The second bullet could have struck Ansari´s head but for the timely blow to the hand holding the revolver," said officials.

Cops took Singh under control after a brief struggle.
Ansari was rushed to Norvic Hospital at Thapathali where he was operated on for half-an-hour to extract the bullet.

Month-long plan

According to the Metropolitan Police Commissioner´s Office (MPCO), which contacted media a few hours after the incident, Singh had arrived in Kathmandu on February 5 to execute a contract killing for Indian Rs 1.5 million, in a deal with two Indian nationals Suresh Dwivedi and Ramu Dwivedi, both from Lucknow. He had already received half the contract money and was to get the rest on completion of the mission.

The Dwivedi duo had met Singh at Kalanki and lodged him in a rented flat at Bode, Bhaktapur. During the past 35 days, Singh visited the Central Jail regularly to study Ansari´s movements.

Singh has stated during preliminary interrogations that he would meet only Shovraj when he visited the jail.

Singh has claimed to be a professional contract killer and to have shot five individuals in India in the past, killing two and injuring three.

Officials said that Singh hid his revolver in his groin to elude the security check at the jail entrance. The brawny, arrogant-looking gunman had pulled out his revolver through a hole in the pocket of his long jacket.

According to investigating officials, Singh did not show any remorse during interrogations. "He rather looked happy to be made public through media as he thought his own life was now not under threat in custody," officials said.

"I took up this mission because I was told that I would not be killed by police even after being arrested and would be released soon because of Nepal´s poor legal system," officials quoted him as saying.

Probe panels

In the wake of the incident worthy of becoming a prestige issue for the government, Nepal Police has formed two separate panels headed by Additional Inspector General (AIG) Rabindra Pratap Shah and SSP Hemanta Malla, chief of Metropolitan Police Crime Division (MPCO), respectively.

Meanwhile, Nepal Police has suspended Sub-inspector Laxman Bhandari and two constables--Manoj Karki and Tilak Ram Chaudhary--as immediate departmental action in connection with the incident.

“We are in the initial phase of investigations that show utter negligence on the part of the security officials concerned. This is not a security lapse as such,” said AIG Arjun Jung Shahi, MPCO chief.

Ansari family´s outcry

Salim Miya Ansari, father of Yunus Ansari and a former minister, has publicly alleged that the Indian intelligence organization RAW carried out this attack in a plan to "finish off a promising Muslim youth". He told reporters at the premises of Norvic Hospital that his family had not been allowed to meet Yunus for a month. “We were not even allowed to meet him while a gunman could freely enter and shoot him,” he said.

“Yunus had told me that he was under threat. He informed the authorities, who did not pay any attention,” Salim said and even alleged that Deputy Inspector General (DIG) Rajendra Singh Bhandari also assisted RAW in carrying out the attack.

Mystery intensifies

The incident has taken place a year after Ansari told the police in the wake of Jamim Shah´s murder that he would have been murdered instead had he not been arrested on fake currency and drugs charges.

Ansari was arrested on January 2010 for allegedly trading in fake Indian currency notes and brown sugar in collusion with two Pakistani nationals. He has been serving time in judicial custody.

Police sources, meanwhile, said that investigations might bring to light the possible link of this incident to the Jamim Shah murder. Nepal Police has concluded that Bablu Srivastav, an Indian underworld kingpin who has been in a Lunknow jail for a few years, had ordered one Deepak Shahi alias Babbu Chhetri to kill Shah. Shah was shot dead in the capital in broad daylight.

Though Singh has said that he only met Shovraj while spying on Ansari´s movements, some jail sources have informed that he would meet other Indian criminals in the Central jail. But this is not corroborated by investigative officials.

India's `hegemony' is a threat to its neighbours

2011-01-12T10:37:00.000+05:45

India's "hegemony" poses a threat to its neighbours, says a premier Chinese daily, citing India's "recent provocation on border issues with China" as proof.

In an opinion piece, the People's Daily says, "In recent years, Indians have become more narrow minded and intolerable of outside criticism as nationalism sentiment rises, with some of them even turning to hegemony.

"It can be proved by India's recent provocation on border issues with China.''

The newspaper, which is the mouthpiece of the ruling Communist Party, says that India's hegemony "is a hundred per cent result of British colonialism. Dating back to the era of British India, the country covered a vast territory including present-day India, Pakistan, Myanmar, Bangladesh as well as Nepal.''

A previous victim of colonialism and hegemony, it said, India started dreaming about developing its own hegemony after the British left.

"Obsessed with such mentality, India turned a blind eye to the concessions China had repeatedly made over the disputed border issues, and refused to drop the pretentious airs when dealing with neighbours like Pakistan.''

To bolster its argument, the newspaper says that even Jawaharlal Nehru had once said that "India could not play an inferior role in the world, and it should either be a superpower or disappear.'

Calling the dream of being a superpower held by Indians "impetuous", the daily says, "The dream of superpower is mingled with the thought of hegemony, which places the South Asian giant in an awkward situation and results in repeated failure.

Since India has constantly been under foreign rule, the newspaper said, "the essence for the rise of India lies in how to be an independent country, to learn to solve the complicated ethnic and religious issues, to protect the country from terrorist attacks, to boost economic development as well as to put more efforts on poverty alleviation.''

But India's hegemonic designs face geopolitical limitation. "It has the Himalaya mountain to its north, a natural barrier for northward expansion; it has Pakistan to the west, a neighbour it is always at odds over the disputed border issues,'' the article says.

Blaming India for pursuing a foreign policy of "befriend the far and attack the near", it said, "It engaged in the war separately with China and Pakistan and the resentment still simmers. If India really wants to be a superpower, such a policy is shortsighted and immature.''

If India wants to be a superpower, the daily said, it needs to have "its eyes on relations with neighbours and abandon the recklessness and arrogance as the world is undergoing earthshaking changes.

"For India, the ease of tension with China and Pakistan is the only way to become a superpower.''

It said China is "proactively engaging in negotiations with India for the early settlement of border dispute and India should give a positive response".

http://nepalnow.blogspot.com/2010/12/wikileaks-and-nepal-part-i.html

2010-12-30T02:50:00.000+05:45

http://nepalnow.blogspot.com/2010/12/wikileaks-and-nepal-part-i.html

India has always wanted a somewhat unstable Nepal. It helps to reinforce and maintain Nepal's dependence on its big brother to the south. --blogdai, "The Big Difference" December 2006

...blogdai sees India throwing support behind the 7-party alliance and yes, the Maoists. It's an open secret anyway, but look for more Indian arms to find their way into party hands in the future. India has always used the Maoists to keep Nepal unstable and dependent ......--blogdai "" A Tangible Shift" September 2005

This leads one to the conclusion that India, through Girija, is now allied with the Maoists. This is a typically sneaky and autocratic way for India to deal with an uppity King so no surprises here from the "worlds largest democracy." ---blogdai "I Don't Even Want to Think About It." June 2005

Indian hegemony

2010-12-12T08:36:00.000+05:45

http://www.daily.pk/global-war-indian-hegemony-over-water-13819/

Indian hegemony

2010-11-20T11:34:00.000+05:45

http://reformistani.wordpress.com/2010/06/27/indian-hegemony-over-bangladesh-by-shah-mohammed-saifuddin/

Resisting Indian Hegemony

2010-10-15T04:32:00.000+05:45

http://rupeenews.com/2008/08/15/resisting-indian-hegemony-by-all-neighbors-afghan-cauldron/

Indian hegemony

2010-09-15T10:30:00.001+05:45

http://northeastindiadiary.blogspot.com/2008/08/indias-hegemony-unmasked-case-of.html

(Dear Readers, we are giving final touches to the website MERO NEPAL-MA NEPALI and this site wil be linked to the new website.)

Embassy’s ‘media meddling’ draws widespread flak

2010-08-31T03:24:00.000+05:45

Political party leaders, Parliamentary committees and advocacy groups have taken serious exception to statements issued by the Indian Embassy that questioned the integrity of the Nepali media, which have questioned the quality of an Indian joint venture product.

In defence of the Nepali media, they have said it is the responsibility of the free press to remain vigilant.

They have demanded the government summon Indian Ambassador Rakesh Sood to inquire about the statement, saying that it is in breach of established diplomatic norms. Though no one would go on record

fearing reprisals from the Embassy, even some senior officials in the joint venture companies say the Embassy’s recent policy could make them a “needless victim”.

In its recent statements, the Indian embassy tried to portray the Nepali media in poor light, claiming that the joint venture has received negative media publicity because it failed to provide advertisements. The embassy statements, however, remain silent on the fact that some half a dozen Indian joint ventures had voiced strong reservations against the embassy policy, asking them to impose an ‘Ad blackout’ on those media houses that the embassy regards as “unfriendly.”

“We have in fact told the embassy that it would not be in our long-term commercial interest to ignore the media that have wide reach,” said a senior official of one of the joint ventures. “We are a commercial enterprise and our decisions should be solely based on commercial interests. Politically motivated decisions will unnecessary hurt us. If the embassy wants to take all the decisions for us, it might as well run our companies.”

Reacting to the issue, Chairman of the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) of the Parliament, Ram Krishna Yadav, on Tuesday said his committee would take up the issue. “The questions raised by the media regarding substandard products of an Indian joint venture have drawn our attention,” Yadav said at the Reporter’s Club.

“We will convene a meeting to hold discussions on the issue at the earliest.” The PAC is the second House committee to express concern over the issue.

On Monday, the House committee on International Relations and Human Rights unanimously condemned the Indian embassy’s statements, directing the government to seek a clarification from Indian Ambassador Sood.

Expressing solidarity with the Nepali media fraternity, the Federation of Nepalese Journalists (FNJ) took strong exception to the statement. “FNJ believes that the embassy’s statement targeting the Nepali media is improper and uncalled-for. FNJ completely disagrees with the statement,” the umbrella body of Nepali journalists said in a statement. It also said it is preparing a detailed report on the recent developments vis-a-vis the embassy’s reactions on Nepali media and vice versa.

CPN-UML leader K.P. Oli said no one should interfere in the freedom of the press in the nation. “No one has the authority to question the people’s right to information,” Oli said in an interview with a radio station. “Consumers have the right to consume quality products.”

Nepali Congress central working committee leader Deep Kumar Upadhyaya and UML leader Pradip Gyawali said it was unfortunate to see that there was needless diplomatic response to what is clearly a commercial issue. “There could have been other ways to clarify the media reports, if they were erroneous,” said Gyawali.

Sadbhawana Party leader Laxman Lal Karna urged the government to investigate the issue. “It is the media’s responsibility to point out the wrongs in the society,” said Karna. “The Indian embassy’s statement is an attack on the free media.”

Similarly, Minister for Peace and Reconstruction, Rakam Chemjong, urged the government to seek an explanation from the Indian envoy. Talking to reporters in Dhankuta, Chemjong said the freedom of the press must be respected and everybody should keep it free from intervention.

Contrary to the Indian Embassy’s claims that the media reports were fabricated, the news reports, among others, are based on lab reports from the Department of Food Technology and Quality Control (DFTQC), a government agency. The DFTQC report released earlier this month said the Dabur juice contained inedible substances, including worms. This was widely covered by the electronic and print media.

Concluding that the Indian statement was a direct attack on the country’s sovereignty and press freedom, the Nepali media fraternity has sought an apology from the embassy.

Embassy statement row

2010-08-30T05:23:00.000+05:45

The Parliamentary Committee on International Relations and Human Rights on Monday unanimously condemned a statement issued by the Indian Embassy in connection with media reports that questioned the quality of products manufactured by Indian joint venture Dabur Nepal.

Concluding that it was a “direct attack” on press freedom, the committee directed the government to initiate a process to take action against the embassy.

In a statement issued on Monday, the committee said the Indian Embassy’s statement was against established diplomatic norms. “The committee hereby directs the government to initiate a process to take action on the above mentioned act of the Indian Embassy,” reads the statement.

Committee Chairman Padma Lal Bishwokarma said the statement crossed all diplomatic boundaries. “We have taken serious exception to the statement. The government must react,” said BK, adding that the committee also urged the government to seek a clarification from Indian Ambassador Rakesh Sood.

The Committee’s statement follows the Nepali media fraternity’s call to the government to issue a rebuttal. In a statement on Friday, the embassy had accused the Nepali media of engaging in “unethical practices.” It claimed that media houses approached Indian joint ventures for advertisements and resorted to negative publicity when their demands were not met.

The Nepali media fraternity had promptly objected to the Indian Embassy’s press statement.

In a joint statement on Saturday, Nepal Media Society (print), Television Broadcasters, Broadcasting Association of Nepal (commercial radio) and Association of Community Radio Broadcasters Nepal (the umbrella organisation for community radio broadcasters) cautioned the Indian Embassy against “overstepping its boundary.” The media fraternity has it that the reports that quoted the government’s probe into the quality of Dabur products, were not “unethical practices”.

Most lawmakers in the Committee urged the government to stop the frequent intervention of the Indian embassy on Nepal’s internal affairs. “The government can take action against any substandard product,” said CPN-UML lawmaker Radha Gayawali. “The government must seek a clarification from the Indian Embassy,” said Sadbhawana Party lawmaker Gauri Mahato.

The embassy men

2010-08-15T19:27:00.002+05:45

As always Indian embassy gifted ambulances to Nepal. Why does the terrorist India like ambulance, is there any pshycological reason. Yes, there is it is their guilt feeling that they are behind the murder and killings of Nepalese people and they gift ambulances.
After Rishi Dhamala being exposed very badly to the media for being Indian embasy man this time the Indian embassy is planning a big media gaging campaign soon.
In a meeting with the embassy paid editors from APCA house and others in Lainchour the Indian terrorist Sood has told his henchmen that they are planning something big and will help the media that help embassy to curtail the press freedom in Nepal that is very dangerous for the so-called democratic India and its expansionary interests. Indian could not fulfill its wish to grab the MRP due to his dadagiri style and it is now trying to gag the media so that it can do anything it wants against Nepal and Nepali people in future. Sood has to be immediately sent back but the India sponsored government of Madhav Kumar Nepal and RAW and emabssy-backed media is silent on the issue of press freedom. The RAW is also planning something big for Kailash Sirohiya and Our kantipur Publications. The embassy people are publicly saying that they can murder Kailash sirohiya like Jamim Shah in Kathmandu in broad daylight. Th Jamim Shah case was also planned by RAW and Indian embassy have supported logistics. In the similar fashion, the RAW has send one journalist to the jamim Shah's publication before making the murder plan. It has again sent its one paid journalist, who is now back to RAW-funded himlayan times after collection informations from Kantipur publications, like he earlier went to Space time and returned back to himalayan times and reporte to RAW. His daughter is studying in Delhi sponsored by the RAW and his masters.
Like the east india company entered in India in the name of business and captured India, the RAW-funded APCA is planning to weaken all the nationalist forces and make puppet government like Madhav Kumar Nepal. Any one who is ationalist and stands for Nepal will be marked for murder and the Indianstate funded terrorist organization RAW and Indian embassy excute the murder in Kathmandu.
According to the terrorist Sood's ola those media persons who oppose his master plan will be sidelined by either murdering or charging them with some fake cases.
Dear media friends, be aware and remain vigilant, anyone who works in himalayantimes and APCA may be spying on you and your daily activities and selling the informations to the India embassy.

MRP from India to Nepal: At What cost?

2010-04-18T12:31:00.000+05:45

TGW
Nepal’s Prime Minister Madhav Kumar Nepal appearing before the Special Hearing of the Public Account Committee (PAC) on Monday declared that the government had awarded the printing rights of Machine Readable Passports (MRP) to India due to the excessive political and diplomatic pressure.

“Under pressing circumstances, government had decided to award the printing rights to India because that the MRP should have been issued by April 1, 2010”, he stated.

It was earlier reported by the Nagarik Daily, February 24, 2010 that Foreign Minister Sujata Koriala had forwarded the proposal to purchase some 40 Lakh (Four million) Machine Readable Passports (MRP) from Indian company summarily ignoring the Global bidding process. She was excessively pressurized by the Indian Government to make the decision, the report had also revealed.

“At the last minute when we were in sheer trouble, we found friend in the Indian establishment and thus we decided to award the printing rights to India”, the Prime Minister replied to queries posed by the PAC members.

“Indian Foreign Minister S.M. Krishna (during his last trip here) and Ambassador to Nepal Rakesh Sood had been requesting Nepal to purchase the MRPs from India”, The Nagarik vernacular daily dated February 24, 2010 had reported.

“We could not take any decision against India because of the political pressure and our sound diplomatic relations with India that exists”, the Prime Minister told the PAC.

“The government was being pressurized by various political parties to quickly take a decision”, he also said.

“We had to cancel the global tender due to some reason”, the PM said but did not reveal as to what were the reasons to cancel it?

“The Indian ambassador in a formal letter sent to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs dated December 4, 2009, while referring to Nepal-India close ties and expressing security concerns due to the open border had expressed India’s “inner” intent to support Nepal in arranging the MRPs on time”, writes Nagarik adding, “In the letter, the ambassador also assured that the MRPs would be made available to Nepal at a cheaper price.”

However, Nagarik wrote further that the price quoted by Security Printing and Minting Corporation of India, company owned by the Indian Government, is much higher than those quoted by the French and Indonesian companies.

PM Nepal was also of the opinion that since a company owned by Indian government is going to print the MRPs, vital information would not be leaked.

On March 23, 2010, Nepal and India formally exchanged confirmation letters regarding the MRP deal and it is expected that India will supply MRPs within 10 weeks.

The Global Civil Aviation authority, ICAO (International Civil Aviation Organization) had officially informed the government that it cannot extend the April 1, 2010 deadline for introducing the high-tech machine readable passports (MRP).

On the other hand, the members of PAC expressed deep dissatisfaction over the subdued response of Prime Minister Madhav Kumar Nepal.

Prakash Chandra Lohani, leader of Rastriya Shakti Janshakti Party and a member of the committee was of the opinion that the government had ridiculed Public Procurement Policies and the decision to award printing rights to India has not been transparent.

He also said that the government’s decision to cancel the global tender was fraudulent and mysterious. He also alleged the prime minister for lying before the committee.

Deep Kumar Upadhyaya of the Nepali Congress Party said that it was due to the unlawful act of the ministry of foreign affairs the country stands insulted and humiliated. How the prime minister can claim that there was political and diplomatic pressure to take the decision in India’s favor when we are not getting the MRPs for free, Upadhyaya questioned.

Sujata-India nexus this…
This also speaks as to how much pressure at times the Indian establishment exerts on Nepal.
But yet, Sujata by awarding this MRP contract to the Indian regime has proved that the family of the Koiralas' will ever remain subservient to the Indian Union.
Her fresh proximity with India may elevate her ranks in the Nepali Congress party, let's presume it to be so for the time being.
Old familial habits die hard.
MP, BP and later GP all served the Indian Union to the best of their abilities (and in the process cheated their own country men at different intervals of time) when they were alive and kicking and now SUJI-Jost is in queue to provide an extension to the "Koirala tradition".
By extension, it does mean that the incumbent Mr. Nepal's government will have some more days in office thanks the MRP deal.
The favor "shamelessly" awarded to the Indian company is a slap on the face of those Nepalese who claim to be nationalists as Chakra Prasad Bastola recently claimed.

RAW against RAW

2010-04-04T12:23:00.000+05:45

A former Nepalese Ambassador to India, Chakra Prasad Bastola has accussed India and US as the main conspirators of the 2001 palace massacre, in which king Birendra and most of the royal family were killed, Nepali daily reported.
Buzz up!"I feel (the Narayanhiti Palace massacre) was a joint plot by India and the US," Bastola was quoted as saying by the Nepali language Nagarik daily.
"As nothing can happen in Nepal without Indian involvement and nothing happens without the knowledge of the US, the superpower, (I think) both were involved in the incident," Bastola said.
Bastola alleged that both India and US have manipulated Birendra's brother Gyanendra, who came to power after Birendra's assassination.
He said that the massacre was planned to eliminate the patriotic and democratic forces in Nepal.
Bastola claimed that the foreign governments had targetted the then Prime Minister G P Koirala, who was one of the guests for the dinner that fateful day.
However, the dinner invitation was later cancelled on the behest of Birendra as he said that the dinner was a family affair.
Investigation by the official commission named the then crown prince Dipendra, who was allegedly under the influence of a cocktail of drugs and alcohol, as the main accussed into the incident.
However, the report failed to find acceptance with a majority of the Nepalese, who held Gyanendra, the sole beneficiary of the massacre, reponsible.
The public outcry against Gyanendra led to the abolition of the 240-year-old monarchy shortly after the UCPN-Maoist came as the largest party in the constitutional assembly polls in 2008.

(NOTICE: Dear redaers, we are creating a site forfight against anytype of Anti-Nepal activities. and link this blog to the new site. See you soon)

RAW, APCA and Indian Embassy after Shah murder

2010-03-05T13:50:00.001+05:45

Terrorists Indian srriked again as they killed a media boss Jamim Shah in broad day light at Lazimpat of Kathmandu.
The sharp shooters who followed him from hotel Yak and Yeti shot him dead at a traffic jam at Lazimpat. They came from The indian embassy and ran back to indian embassy, according to the eye-witnesses.
Shjah has ben labelled as Dawood's man by RAW and Indian establishment and Indian embassy and the APCA House were following his movements. The police didnot act for an hour at the order from Madam Khadka, who is taking the capital city's security responsibility.
The police came to action after they got green signal from the Indian embassy and APCA Hpuse that the shooters were sent back safely.
The relation between the IGP chand and APCA House is very cordial as the RAW operatives posing as journalists fropm Indians in the himalayan newspapers published by APCA and its nepali annapurna post are freqyently with the Chans and police officer seen in the restaurents in Kathmandu valley.
The newspaer has people working for the RAW and Indian embassy, who report every news to first to delhi RAw and Indian embassy.
Some of them who have recently left the Shah's channel Nepal are instrumental in the passing of the shah's informations to the RAW and the editor himself informed the Indian embassy on how to carry the news and twist it.
Prakash rimal and Rajan Pokhrel report to the RAW in delhi and Ajay Khanal and Arjun Bhandari report to Indian embassy. They have been distorting the news and try to btainwash the reader. That's why APCA should be closed for the sake of Nepal's sovereignty. Otherwise some other editors and publishers of other newspapers and kantipur will be the next target of RAW as they slowly start propaganda against them and label them also as anti-Indian.
May be some of the RAW people from himalayan and annapurnal post will join the Kantipur and start collecting the information of the publishers and the editors and report to the RAW. So, they can kill these people.
They will be after our kantipur and its english newspaper, TKp and no wonder if the publisher and editor of these newspapers, who write pro-Nepal news will be soon dubbed anti-indian and will be targetted like Jamim Shah.
Sood is the most key person in the killings of pro-nepal media people as he sees every nepali nationalists as anti-Indian. He wanted to turn Nepal into Afghanistan but he falied and he is trying to murder some of the pro-nepal meadia people to threaten all. But he will never succeed as every Nepali knows Indian embasy is the manufacturer of the Indian terrorists to create problems in Nepal. India is a terrorist country and its state-sponser terrorism has done a lots of damage to Nepal till date. But how long could Indian terrorists damage Nepal as the international community is also watching Indian terrorist act in Nepal.
Though to show that it is working,
Police have suspended four policemen deployed at the police beat in Lazimpat at the time of Jamim Shah’s murder blaming them of the security lapses. But Madan Khada, who is onpayroll from the Indian embassy, RAW and APCA is spared.
Chief of Metropolitan Police Range, Kathmandu SP Ganesh KC organising a press conference at his office in Hanumandhoka claimed that other police officers are also involved.
The APCA House immediately after the murder of Shah's murder started security checking fearing counter attack. The Idian who were working posing as journalists in APCA were also sent back to Delhi.

Indian RAW strikes again on Nepali soil

2010-02-07T17:40:00.001+05:45

Summary of the Book “India Doctrine” written by Barrister MBI Munshi

2010-01-25T12:50:00.000+05:45

In India Doctrine, the writer Mr. Munshi has tried to lay emphasis on the point that India from the very beginning has been pursuing a policy of establishing hegemony in the region.

Mr. Munshi through evidences, arguments and her practices has tried to prove that the intentions of India are nothing short of this. To materialize India’s objective the EU and the USA have also joined hands with her. The USA has concluded a treaty for cooperation in the nuclear field with India although it (USA) propagates non-proliferation of nuclear weapons.

This nuclear agreement she did to contain the Chinese influence in the South Asian region. This is a direct threat to peace in the region. Besides the propaganda onslaught against Bangladesh and other countries here through some persons and media is on. The visit of Shaikh Hasina to India in 2003 and again in 2005, were of considerable significance. The 2007 election was also important for them since it was the desire of India that Awami League should come into power. The insurgency in Chittagong Hill Tracts was creation of India. In brief India has been instrumental in destabilizing situation in Bangladesh as well as in other countries of the South Asian region like Pakistan, Nepal and Sri Lanka etc.

The book says India was partitioned in 1947 but India followed the undeclared policy of re-unification or Akhand Bharat since then. The skirmishes along the borders, the unabated killing of innocent civilians of Bangladesh, insurgencies in Nepal, Pakistan (Baluchistan) Sri Lanka are pointer towards this.

India does not believe in two nation theory since they consider that there are other common cultural, ethnic grounds for forming a nation. India viewed emergence of Bangladesh as an independent state which negates the division on the basis of religion.

Nehru’s ideology centred round non-partition of India or the Akhand Bharat as detailed in his book, “The discovery of India” (1947). And this policy has been followed subsequently even after partition in 1947. Nehru/ruled from 1947 to 1964 and his successors were no different from him. The situation of Sikkim in 1973-75 was similar to that of Nepal’s in 2006. In both cases the rulers were over thrown. The former became a constituent part of India while the latter (Nepal) began to be ruled by the persons of choice of India.

As regard Pakistan, Indira Gandhi at a public meeting on Nov, 30, 1970 observed, “India has never reconciled with the existence of Pakistan, Indian leaders always believed that Pakistan should not have been created and that Pakistan nation has no right exist”.

The book says that, keeping the above in view it could be said that India’s role in 1971 war to help Bangladesh was according to her own policy consideration of Akhand Bharat. The later events like looting and taking away of military equipments after Pakistanis were defeated, unequal distribution of Farraka water, killing of Bangladeshis at the borders, inciting insurgencies within Bangladesh territories, indirect interference in shaping Bangladesh foreign policy, creating problem for garment industries etc. loudly speak of the Indian intentions.

The book says that, Henry Kissinger, the then National Security Advisor and Secretary of State thought that India’s help for the then East Pakistanis in their struggle for liberation was purely motivated by self-interest guided by the dream of claiming of all territories ruled by the former British colonial power. J. N. Dixit, the vet-ran diplomat in his book, “Liberation and beyond”, gives the impression that it was Pakistan which wanted to break India and created condition in the former East Pakistan to make a cause to attack India. This is an absurd proposition for it was India which impeded the return of refugees when a political settlement was in the offing in the later part of 1971. Further, after 9/11, there were sufficient reasons to believe that India instigated insurgences through JMB out-fit as the confessional statement of its deceased leader proved. This was done to tarnish the image of Bangladesh as a terrorist state.

After liberation of Bangladesh in 1971, India started propaganda offensive both within and out side India against Bangladesh. Noted left leaning writers are on their pay rolls in Bangladesh. This is done to materialize their goal of Akhand Bharat. Hence it is felt necessary that against their propaganda offensive, RAW’s clandestine activities, counter offensive both through media measures and active intelligence surveillance are must.

The book says that the six points became a great plea for going into a tougher movement. Had that been accepted, it was presumed that Pakistan would not have broken and nor independent Bangladesh emerged in 1971. After 1971, India became more active to make the newly emerged state its part. For this she appointed Chittarangan Sutar as Shaikh Saheb’s representative in India. Sutar had direct access to Indian Prime Minister and other high officials there. His plans however failed following assassination of Shaikh Saheb in August 1975.

India entered into a 7 point agreement with the then Bangladesh government in exile (located in Calcutta) which contained provisions like no standing army for Bangladesh, Joint forces for Bangladesh with the command lying with the Indian Army Chief, identical foreign policy etc. The defeat of Pakistani army and its surrender to the Indian General, (Sans Bangladesh Army Chief) and the terms having never been shown to Bangladesh, apparently spoke that virtually Bangladesh belonged to India since India won the war with Pakistan and took its soldiers captive. The Mujib Bahini, the Rakhi Bahini etc. were created to seek their assistance in consolidating the Indian Government’s authority in Bangladesh and also to use them when the appropriate time had come as thought by India. Their authority was further strengthened by the 25 years treaty of friendship which also fortified the 7 point agreement made by the government in exile. As said before the plan of subordinating Bangladesh failed following assassination of Shaikh Saheb. India could have walked over but restrained itself for fear of international condemnation etc. It however continued its effort to destabilize it and others by harboring insurgencies through RAW and other agencies in Bangladesh, Sri Lanka Nepal and Pakistan. The insurgencies in Chittagong Hill Tracts are worth mentioning.

The book has been further enriched by the valuable contributions from the eminent writers of both home and abroad. Professor Khodeja Begum in her article laid emphasis on the India’s concept of Akhand Bharat or united India quoting authentic references like the 7 point agreement made between Indian government and Bangladesh government in exile. She also quoted the Ananda Bazar Patrika’s observation following 1991 election. The Patrika said that the people in Bangladesh should raise their voice for merger with India. Brig Gen (Retd) Shakhawat laid emphasis on geopolitical condition of Bangladesh and suggested for careful move for making relationship with USA, China and more importantly India.

Other Nepalese and Sri Lanka writers have also blamed India for inciting insurgencies and instability in the neighboring countries. Maoists in Nepal and LTTE in Sri Lanka are the beneficiaries of the Indian government.

'India Must Show Genuine Respect to Nepal'

2010-01-12T12:37:00.000+05:45

Indian movie star Hrithik Roshan sparked riots in Nepal last month after he allegedly expressed dislike for the country and its people in an interview. He later denied making the remarks, but five people had already died in the violence, several Indian businesses in Kathmandu were destroyed, and relations between the two countries took a turn for the worse. India's former foreign secretary, Salman Haidar, who has been involved in important negotiations with Nepal in the past, spoke recently to TIME contributor Maseeh Rahman about the peculiar nature of relations between the two South Asian nations. Edited excerpts:

TIME: Did the intensity of the violence in Nepal surprise you?
Haidar: It came out of a clear blue sky, so it was bound to be a surprise. But it does illustrate the touchiness of Nepalese opinion over any sense of big brotherly treatment from India, any expression of disdain or a lack of regard and respect. It shows how easily a situation can heat up even when the evidence [of Indian disregard] is so shaky.

TIME: How does one try and understand such a reaction from the Nepalese?
Haidar: Our neighbors see us more clearly than we see them. This is natural, since India is a very large country, and our neighbors are much smaller. A great deal of Nepal's day-to-day activity, economic or otherwise, is tied up with India. Given the disproportionate sizes of the two countries, they have to keep a constant focus on what's going on in India. Nepal is very close to us -- it is closer culturally than any other neighbor. But it is also a very proud country with its own tradition of independence, which is older than India's. They feel that India is not sufficiently mindful of their feelings and their interests.

TIME: India has supported Nepal's pro-democracy movement in the past. But despite the historic links, there are strong anti-Indian lobbyists within Nepalese political parties.
Haidar: It's a curious matter, but democratization of politics in Nepal has increased the possibility of misunderstanding. There are a number of political parties in Nepal, and quite a few groups within these parties, all of which have ample scope to air their views and mobilize public opinion in their favor.

TIME: India and Nepal have a special relationship. With millions of Nepalese working in India, and Indians active in business in Nepal, shouldn't ordinary Nepalese feel less suspicion and hostility toward India?
Haidar: For exactly this reason the suspicion has increased. The inequality of size and capacity gets emphasized because of these realities [of dependence], and increases the Nepalese sense of vulnerability. You use the word "special." I recall more than 30 years ago an Indian delegation that had gone to Nepal, and came back empty-handed because of this word "special." The Indian delegation felt some reference to a "special" relationship had to be included in the final communique. For Nepal, this was unacceptable. Sovereign equals have normal relations. A special relationship implies a certain inequality. That's not acceptable as a concept for Nepal.

TIME: But wouldn't Nepal lose a lot if the two countries had a "normal relationship?"
Haidar: Their perception is that certain realities are irreversible. For example, there are so many Nepalese living in India that you cannot suddenly clamp down on them and say you can't live here anymore. [Nepalese are free to live and work in India without visas or permits, and around four million do so.]

TIME: For decades India and Nepal have been in negotiations over the use of their common boundary river, the Mahakali. You were involved in the 1996 Mahakali River agreement, but it still has not been implemented. What's happening?
Haidar: Natural resources by their very nature are a very sensitive matter politically. We agreed to help develop the area, and we envisage there will be more such agreements allowing both countries to jointly exploit the tremendous hydroelectric and water resources that Nepal has.

TIME: Yet Nepal's parliament has still not ratified the agreement.
Haidar: The issue was deliberately politicized by a group within the UML [United Marxists-Leninists] party that felt uneasy with this kind of linkage between India and Nepal. The UML supported the Mahakali agreement when it was in the ruling coalition, but by the time the agreement came up for ratification before parliament, the party was in opposition. And under the influence of a group within the party, the UML took a contrary view. This demonstrates how in a democracy, groups that are very much a part of the political system are capable of having a disproportionate impact on events. It's not very different from what you see in India, where quite often, small pressure groups can have a huge impact. The agreement is not dead though and may well get implemented.

TIME: Historically, New Delhi has been wary of China's influence in Kathmandu. How far does that account for problems in India-Nepal relations?
Haidar: After the India-China border war in 1962, there was extreme sensitivity on India's part and great reluctance to see Nepal as just another neighbor with whom normal relations could develop. We felt that for India's security, a special relationship needed to be affirmed. This provided an opening for China, and Beijing made a determined attempt to wean Nepal away from a dependence on India for its economic growth and political structures. But as relations between India and China have taken on a different character, the sense of Nepal being able to play one against the other has faded. Today, I don't think that Beijing is a decisive factor in India-Nepal relations.

TIME: There's a lot of talk about Pakistan, especially its Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) agency, fishing in Nepal's troubled waters.
Haidar: Let's not lose perspective. On the whole relations between India and Nepal are very good. Communication between the two governments is excellent. But problems are bound to crop up due to the imbalance [between the two countries]. Organizations like the ISI can fish in the troubled parts of Nepal's waters -- there will be groups that are susceptible to ISI influence, but these are not groups that dominate or control Nepalese policy. They can and do make trouble for India, and we know that some politicians are very close to the ISI and are ready to do their bidding. But let that not be seen as evidence of the ISI dominating Nepalese policy.

TIME: So it would be simplistic to say that the latest anti-India riots were organized, as some commentators insist, by either the Bombay underworld or the ISI?
Haidar: The match could have been lit by anyone, but what is more significant is that the tinder is there. There is uneasiness among various Nepalese over how India can dominate them, and violate their sentiments and their rights.

TIME: So what can India do to try and improve this "big brother" image it has in Nepal?
Haidar: India has to tread with care and show some genuine respect. It has to understand that Nepal is a sovereign country that will not move at India's bidding, even in matters where India will be touchy. Nepal may not want to get absorbed into an Indian pattern of economic growth, and may want to pursue a different path. A greater respect on India's side for Nepalese sentiment and independence, for autonomous processes of growth and development, would be helpful. But even if India adopts a sensitive policy, the risk of an accident remains due to the imbalance in size and capacity of the two neighbors.

TIME: Around 100,000 people of Nepali origin who were thrown out of Bhutan continue to live in refugee camps in Nepal without much hope of going home. Can't India do more to help Nepal overcome this problem?
Haidar: Nepal and Bhutan are friendly neighbors, and if we get involved, we'd be blamed by both. President Clinton expressed hope recently that this issue would be settled. And there have been some high-level American visitors [to South Asia] also trying to find a solution. There's an expectation now that the stalled process of identifying those refugees eligible for repatriation back to Bhutan will be resumed. This is a matter in which India's good offices should be made available to both sides, but so far New Delhi has chosen not to intervene.

Srruggle against Indian hegemony

2009-12-21T12:31:00.000+05:45

Thousands of Maoist protesters in Nepal enforced the second day of their nationwide general strike on Monday, shouting anti-government slogans and paralyzing much of the country as businesses remained shuttered and vehicle traffic was almost nonexistent in the capital, Katmandu.

The quieter protests Monday contrasted with the violent clashes that erupted a day earlier between the police and demonstrators in Katmandu. On Sunday, the police arrested at least 70 people as officers used batons and tear gas to break up protesters, who were blocking roads and preventing Nepal’s prime minister from reaching his residence after returning from the international climate change talks in Copenhagen.

“The situation is quite normal compared to yesterday,” said Jaya Mukunda Khanal, spokesman for the Nepal Home Ministry. “People are in the streets. There is no transportation, but people can walk around.”

The general strike is the latest development in Nepal’s mounting political crisis. Three years after Maoist rebels agreed to end their decade-old armed revolt and participate in politics, the peace process is under a severe strain. In the streets of Katmandu on Monday, thousands of Maoists blocked intersections near ministerial buildings, shouting slogans and demanding the resignation of the current government.

Last year, the Maoists won enough seats in national elections to lead a coalition government and elect their leader, Pushpa Kamal Dahal, also known as Prachanda, as prime minister. But Prachanda resigned in May to protest a constitutional dispute with the president over the Nepalese military. Since then, the Maoists have staged demonstrations and even declared certain areas, including Katmandu, as symbolic “autonomous zones” beyond governmental authority.

The clash on Sunday occurred around 2:30 p.m. Bigyan Sharma, deputy inspector general of the Nepal police, said officers approached protesters, who were blocking a main road leading from the airport into the city. He said officers wanted to clear the road to allow the prime minister, Madhav Kumar Nepal, to reach his residence after returning from the talks in Copenhagen.

Officer Sharma said the protesters refused to move and then hurled stones at officers, badly injuring a police commander, who was taken to the hospital. Officer Sharma said the police then turned water cannons on the demonstrators while other officers used batons and tear gas. Ultimately, the authorities transported the prime minister by an alternate route, Officer Sharma said.

“The police were not too aggressive,” said Mr. Khanal, the home ministry spokesman. “The police had to clear the road.”

But Dinanath Sharma, a spokesman for the Maoists, disputed that account and accused the police of overzealousness. He said officers attacked peaceful protesters and that two Maoist parliamentarians were badly injured. “Our protest program is peaceful,” Mr. Sharma said. “It was not from our side. The police forcefully tried to suppress us.”

On Monday, a relative calm settled over Katmandu, witnesses said. Demonstrators were holding sit-down protests in groups of 100 or 200, according to the police, calling for the “people’s supremacy.”

The strike is schedule to end Tuesday. The police estimated that 4,000 protesters were on the streets of the capital, while other demonstrations were underway in other cities in Nepal.

A Sample Focus Piece from International Boundary Monitor

2009-12-10T15:17:00.000+05:45

A Sample Focus Piece from International Boundary Monitor (15 May 1998),
by International Boundary Consultants

India's Boundary Disputes with China, Nepal, and Pakistan

The recent detonation of a series of nuclear devices by India and Pakistan has increased tension in South Asia and threatens to inflame long-standing boundary disputes that India has with China, Nepal, and Pakistan. The disputes with China and Pakistan have already triggered several wars. The new Hindu-nationalist government in New Delhi has reversed movement toward détente with Beijing and Islamabad. The areas in contention with China and Pakistan are among the largest land-boundary disputes in the world. The Indo-Nepali dispute over Kalapani is more recent and involves a small area.

India-China (Aksai Chin and Arunachal Pradesh)

In the 1962 Sino-Indian War, China seized a Switzerland-sized area, Aksai Chin (Aksayqin), and overran Arunachal Pradesh (an Indian state the size of Austria). There are also other, smaller pockets of disputed area.[1] The PRC withdrew from virtually all of Arunachal Pradesh to the Line of Actual Control (LAC), which approximates the McMahon Line that is found in a 1914 agreement initialed by British, Tibetan, and Chinese representatives.[2] Chinese and Indian forces clashed in the Sumdorong Chu valley of Arunachal Pradesh in 1986-87. Relations began to thaw in 1988.

On 7 September 1993, China and India signed an accord to reduce tensions along their border and to respect the LAC. During November 1996, China and India agreed to delimit the LAC and institute confidence-building measures (CBMs) along the frontier. The agreement pledged nonaggression, prior notification of large troop movements, a 10-km no-fly zone for combat aircraft, and exchange of maps to resolve disagreements about the precise location of the LAC. In August 1997 the sides ratified the CBM agreement. There seems to have been little substantive progress, except for a series of high-level visits.[3] The most recent, on 27 April, was the first visit by a PRC Chief of Staff to India. However, two weeks before the visit the new Indian Defense Minister, George Fernandes, accused the PRC of repeated violations of Indian territory, including the construction of a helipad on "Indian" territory in the disputed zone, and of aiding Pakistan's nuclear and missile programs. On 3 May he publicly labeled China as India's number one threat and alleged that the PRC was stockpiling nuclear weapons in Tibet, expanding naval activity off the Burmese coast, and conducting surveillance against India from Burma's Coco Islands.[4] After the visit of General Fu Quanyou and PRC protests, Fernandes said that his characterization of China as India's principal threat was a personal view, but he went on to pledge that the number of Indian troops along the frontier with China would not be reduced. Such a statement calls into question part of the agreed CBMs. (To view a map of this area click here.)

China and India have yet to address their fundamental and very large land boundary disputes. Moreover, their bilateral relations are complicated by the issues of Tibet (Xizang), Sikkim, and Kashmir. India plays host to the Dalai Lama and a large number of Tibetan refugees. They present an implicit threat to Chinese control of Tibet, which it invaded in 1950. On its maps, the PRC continues to portray Sikkim, which was absorbed by India in 1974, as an independent country. In addition to the Aksai Chin, China and India dispute another section of Kashmir (the area west of Aksai Chin).

India-Pakistan-China (Kashmir)

When India and Pakistan became independent of Great Britain in 1947, the various princely states, including that of Jammu and Kashmir, could accede to either country. An armed revolt of Muslim peasantry against the Maharaja of Jammu and Kashmir prompted the Maharaja to accede to India in order to gain military aid. Pakistan objected and the countries went to war. The matter was taken up by the UN Security Council in 1948, which adopted a resolution calling for the restoration of order, the withdrawal of Pakistani forces and reduction of Indian forces, and a UN plebiscite. India and Pakistan objected to various of these provisions. They went to war over Kashmir again in 1965. In 1971 India intervened in Pakistan's civil war that led to the independence of Bangladesh. India and Pakistan came close to war over Kashmir in 1990. (To view a map of this area click here.)

UN observers monitor part of the Indo-Pakistani cease-fire line. The current line was established by the 1972 Simla accord and approximately follows the 1949 Cease-fire Line. The coordinates of the Simla line have not been published, and the line was never delimited in the forbidding Siachin Glacier, near the Chinese frontier, where India and Pakistan frequently trade artillery rounds. Firing incidents and allegations of infiltration are chronic along the entire cease-fire line.

The Indian-controlled part of Jammu and Kashmir became a state in 1974. The parts of Kashmir controlled by Pakistan, Azad Kashmir and the Northern Areas, have anomalous status as administered territories. In 1963 China and Pakistan delimited a boundary that India claims illegally gave part of Kashmir to China. In 1987 a Sino-Pakistani protocol formalized demarcation of their boundary. The termination of this boundary at the Karakoram Pass on the Chinese line of control suggests that Pakistan recognizes Chinese sovereignty over Aksai Chin, which is part of the former Princely State of Kashmir.

India and Pakistan have held sporadic talks. In June 1997, they agreed to eight issues for discussion, including the issue of Kashmir and their maritime boundary. Pakistan wants to set-up a separate task force on Kashmir; India has resisted the idea. Talks have made little progress due to changes in the respective governments. The recent efforts by US Ambassador Richardson to resolve the dispute seem to have been blown out of the water by Indian and Pakistani nuclear tests.

India-Nepal (Kalapani)

The dispute between India and Nepal involves about 75 sq km of area in Kalapani, where China, India, and Nepal meet. Indian forces occupied the area in 1962 after China and India fought their border war.[5] Three villages are located in the disputed zone: Kuti [Kuthi, 30°19'N, 80°46'E], Gunji, and Knabe. India and Nepal disagree about how to interpret the 1816 Sugauli treaty between the British East India Company and Nepal, which delimited the boundary along the Maha Kali River (Sarda River in India). The dispute intensified in 1997 as the Nepali parliament considered a treaty on hydro-electric development of the river. India and Nepal differ as to which stream constitutes the source of the river. Nepal regards the Limpiyadhura as the source; India claims the Lipu Lekh. Nepal has reportedly tabled an 1856 map from the British India Office to support its position. The countries have held several meetings about the dispute and discussed jointly surveying to resolve the issue.[6] Although the Indo-Nepali dispute appears to be minor, it was aggravated in 1962 by tensions between China and India. Because the disputed area lies near the Sino-Indian frontier, it gains strategic value.

Like most boundary dispute, those of India with its neighbors are symptomatic of wider bilateral relations. Boundaries are manifestations of national identity. They can be trip-wires of war. Recent developments in South Asia suggest that peaceful resolution of these disputes is receding from reach.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. The author wishes to thank the Office of the Geographer and Global Issues, US Department of State for providing information used in the preparation of the accompanying maps. However, the views expressed are those of the author and do not represent United States policy.
2. Although the US government has a general policy of staying neutral in foreign boundary disputes, the 1962 Sino-Indian conflict prompted the US President and Secretary of State publicly to affirm India's claim line in Arunachal Pradesh.
3. The Pioneer (Delhi, 7 May 1998), p. 8.
4. AFP (Hong Kong) 3 May 1998; Jansatta (Delhi, 5 May 1998), p. 6; Associated Press (Beijing) 5 May 1998.
5. Kyodo (Tokyo) 9 September 1997.
6. The Kathmandu Post, 16 July 1997, 2 July 1997, 31 May 1996; The Hindustan Times (Delhi), 9 June 1997, p. 13; Xinhua 11 April 1997.

Height of an Indian's hegemony over Nepal

2009-11-25T11:24:00.000+05:45

"Ashok Mehta's commentary "Nepal needs a make over" is totally biased, prejudiced irresponsive and cunning in nature."

Ashok Mehta's commentary "Nepal needs a make over" placed at web site www.dailypioneer.com is totally biased, prejudiced, irresponsive and cunning in nature. With what dignity and authority an Indian Army retired red tape dared to comment over the personal issues of an independent and sovereign nation, Nepal?

Contents of Mehta's this spinning script demonstrates that he holds a latent conspiracy and has several ploys against the peace and prosperity of Nepal. Mehta's conspiracy might derail the ongoing peace process in Nepal and affect the safety and security of entire regions in South Asia. Who is to blame for these repercussions?

No doubts, why this retired Indian Army General had faced several disciplinary actions including serious Military charges like Court martial in his midterm Army career. It is not enough of him. All the Nepalese responsive citizens remember the black days of Mehata's past stay in Nepal.
"
One can still identify those innocent Nepalese village girls who were sexually exploited and harassed by this unethical and irresponsive General. So, Mr. Mehta is advised that instead of spitting venom and throwing provocative comments over Nepal's fate he should better regret himself for his crooked mentality and inhuman acts over innocent and ignorant Nepalese souls.

Mehta's identity can never be abolished in this entire South Asian region. It is an open secret that Mehta is the key actor of Indian intelligence Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) being activated in SAARC region? Ask any innocent SIKKIMESE or BHUTANESE citizen about the cunningness and conspiracy of this crooked personality.

It is true that this fox is plugging a thrilling conspiracy against the aspirations and quest of Nepalese people. Nepalese Patriots! Beware!! What concern does he have with the freedom and rights of Nepalese citizens? How will he feel if a Nepalese citizens fiddle with the policy of his country, India?

Mehta has no rights and authority to interrupt over the personal matters of Nepal. We Nepalese people also have sound brains to handle our internal problems. We are conscious about Mehta's grand design of "SIKKIMIZATION" of Nepal. So, honorable court martial experienced General! Instead of advocating for your puppet political party (CPN Maoists), you should advise Nepalese policy makers for the better solutions of bringing peace and stability in your neighborhood.

You must realize that you live in this region too. Mehta should better stop acting over smart. He should better be a good neighbor and survive in safe neighborhood. Remember every action has always equal and opposite reaction. Never dream of reincarnating LENDUP DORJE in Nepal. Why not you scan your biography and seek apology from the sober Nepalese people for your inhuman past behavior in Nepal.

90 per cent of Interference in Nepal comes from India: Mahara

2009-11-10T12:21:00.000+05:45

In an exclusive interview with the Kantipur Daily dated September 20, 2009, Mr. Krishna Bahadur Mahara of the Unified Maoists’ party accepts that in the fresh visit of party Chairman Pushpa Kamal Dahal to Hong Kong, the Maoists’ team had met with some high placed China's leadership.

Say experts, the Maoist’s Party of Nepal that is sharing worst relations with India after the fall of the Maoists’ led government on May 4, 2009, the increasing hobnob with the Chinese regime of the Maoists’ leadership thereafter, and, of late Prachanda’s secret meeting with the Chinese leadership in Hong Kong has sent (it has already been sent) spine chilling waves to the coercive New Delhi leadership which unfortunately provided shelter to the leaders of the Maoists’ Party, including Mr. Mahara for over a decade. What an unjust world? Bear with it!

Mahara replying to a query posed by Kantipur says that Mrs. Nirupama Rao, the Indian Foreign Secretary while in Kathmandu had met with Dr. Babu Ram Bhattarai, the Maoists’ party vice chairman and her meet with Bhattarai meant that the Maoists party still accorded priority to the Indian establishment.

“What could show our respect to her than our vice chairman meeting her” Mahara asks.

Mahara, the international bureau chief of the Maoists party however, rejects the idea that the Maoists’ want enhanced relations with China at the cost of India.

“We have good relations with various political forces of India as well”, Mahara thus politely rubs ointment in the Indian wound.

“We feel that we must share enhanced relations with China as well, we are in the process of developing such relations with the northern neighbor...the practice has already begun", adds Mahara.

“Not just India and China, we must build cordial and friendly relations with other countries, beyond the countries in the neighborhood.”

“We are positive towards relations that Nepal shares with India”, he says adding, “But, we will never tolerate the Indian interference in Nepali politics.”

“Yes, our relations with India are slightly strained but not at that level as that could not be corrected", he continues.

Some Indian citizens are worried in having concluded that the Nepali Maoists did not come to their fold”, Mahara says forwarding a suggestion that “such mindset must be changed.”

“There is absolutely no space to criticize Chinese political interference in Nepal”, he says “as far as interference of India and China is concerned in Nepal affairs, the fact is that of the total, 90 per cent of political interference in Nepal originate from the Indian side”.

A daring declaration indeed.

Mahara honestly tells the Kantipur that “Chinese interference may only account to 10 per cent”.

“China is clear on its Nepal policy”, Mahara says, “The Chinese support is clear in that it comes through the proper channel of the Nepal Government.”

Why has India invited Jhalnath Khanal

2009-11-04T15:03:00.000+05:45

Why has India invited Jhalnath Khanal to India. Its not a surprise because India wants to tame Jhalnath Khanal like KP OLI and Madhav Kumar Nepal.
The Terai-based parties are quite and not protesting beacuse in Terai India is exposed. The RAW has been very active in Terai for long but the problem started when the Americans and West powers including China told India not to meddle the Terai and create unrest.
But Indian has started new policy of cosying CPN (UML) as it has invited party chairman Jhalnatha Khanal.
The power bloc in , created in 1947, does not sincerely recognize Nepal as an independent country. It talks about Nepal’s independence in only those times when it diplomatically needs to avoid bad consequences of its “doings” in Nepal. It treats Nepal as territory for playing out its power games. And it plays these games “internally” by promising each “big” leader of every Nepali political party the post of Nepal’s prime ministership/presidency. The memoirs/books by BP Koirala, GM Singh, KP Bhattarai, MP Koirala, Bharat Mohan Adhikari eloquently record the way the power bloc of India plays in Nepal.
This also explains the rationale for short term tenure of government leadership in Nepal (10 prime ministers in the last 10 years) and the incentive this (short term tenure of the government leadership) holds for the Indian power bloc.
Just compare the size (territory) of India had when it was created in 1947 and the one it claims now. One may visit a good library for the yearly Almanac of the Statesman (Calcutta) and pick up it for 1950, 1960, 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000 (this is an example for yearly sample and interval). This will very clearly establish not only the fact about the up- scaling “elasticity” of TROI territory in Trans-Himalayan Asia but also the unilaterally imposed so-called open border on the innocent people of Nepal.
India is manipulative enough to work “internally” in Nepal as its formal takeover or annexation of Nepal will bring it directly over to Tibet Autonomous Region of China; and the security and economic costs of such doing will be simply infinite for India.
Sensing this China has started the campaign in Kashmir treating it as a separate country.
The Chinese are more watchful of Indian activities in Nepal and now India feels it should have its pseudo-Nepali voice. So, India's RAW started The Himalayan Times and Annapurna Post to start their propaganda in Nepal against its neighbours.
If one reads The Himalayan Times and Annapurna Post, the news aganist China, Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Pakistan are always front page. The editors of both the newspapers are not journalists but the Indian-paid dogs who can only bark in front of other Nepali collegues but lick the Indians boot.
There is no difference between Rishi Dhamala and these editors, who are RAW agents. They should be arrested and put behind the bars for the security of the country and its sovereignty.
by Upendra Gautam

Why Nepal hates India:-Delhi’s Maoist headache

2009-10-30T11:16:00.000+05:45

Bharat (aka India) has problems with all the countries surrounding it. No other country on the planet has had war with all her neighbors. Bharati attempts at taking over Nepal have backfired. Even though Nepal is Hindu majority country, it does not want to be part of Bharat. Delhi has been interfering in the internal affairs of Nepal for the past six decades–at one point imposing a trade embargo on the land locked country. It’s impossible to imagine that Delhi can be convinced to play a creative and helpful role in Nepal’s peace process. Bharat is aflame, from the tip of Nepal down to the depths of Andhara Pradesh in a rebellion that control about 40% of the land mass of Bharat. The flaring Maoist insurgency within Bharat and the emotional kinship that Nepali Maoists want to share with their Chinese brethren is a huge impediment to Nepali-Bharati relations.
The mountain Hindu kingdom of Nepal; India wants to take it over. The Maoists more freindly with China then Delhi want to keep Nepal independent

The Maoists recently quit the government protesting Indian interference. Peace is in jeopardy in the Himalayan state. The issue–getting rid of a pro-Indian general who had refused to listen to the Pro-Chinese Maoist rime Minister. The Maoists are a huge migraine headache for Delhi. The Maoists support the Naxaliteswhich control 40% of the Indian landmass. Once in power the Maoists continue their links with the Naxalites. Red Nepal: Clear and present danger to India

The Maoists are mad at Delhi for the interference. If India continues its diktat, the Maoists could retreat to the mountains and begin the war once again. China has a lot of influence in Napal.

The Bharati establishment has to stop interfering in Nepal’s internal affairs, which is making Delhi’s relations bad with her neighbros to the North, West, East and South. Looking at the countries which surround Bharat, one can see that all are unfriendly. Delhi needs deep introspection, and take measures to make neighboring countries more friendly rather than alienating them. Nepal wants to scrap much hated “Treaty of Friendship” with India

The 1950 Treaty of Peace and Friendship between India and Nepal allows for free movement of people and goods between the two nations and a close relationship and collaboration on defence and foreign affairs. For New Delhi, the treaty is a tool to lessen Beijing’s influence on Kathmandu. But it has been drawing flak in Nepal, with the Maoists who now outnumber others in the Himalayan country’s Constituent Assembly demanding revision of the treaty.

Bharat can continue to view the North with suspicion. Delh can let the Maoists be the over-riding objective of its Nepal policy or be a good neighor. The choice is for Delhi to make. It can continue to pro-actively interfere in Nepal as it has been doing since 2005 or it can learn to appreciate the growing communists in Nepal and deal with them. Interference has been counterproductive for Delhi.

Naxalite insurgency spreading like wildfire in Bharat. Hindustan's Maoist insurgency map. There are secessionist movements in almost every state in "India" encompasisng more than 200 districts. The Naxals have been supported by the Maoists in Nepal. With the Maoist victory in Nepal the Naxals and Maoists of Bharat are increasingly more assertive

India seems to have lost the battle for influence in Nepal. Once the Big Brother that controlled every aspect of of Nepali life, Delhi has little influence on decision making in Kathmandu. When Delhi tries to force its will, the Nepalis don’t listen. Nepali Maoists fouhgt a long and protracted war of independence from Indian interference. The people of Nepal won, and put the Pro-Chinese Maoists in power.

The Foreign Secretary Nirupama Rao arrives in Kathmandu on her first visit to its Norhtern neighbor. Bharati interference has brought the peace process to the brink. Nepal is grappling with its most serious political crisis since the king abdicated power to parliament. Nuclear flashpoint: How India lost Nepal to China

India has to make certain difficult policy choices, reconcile the contradictions between its stated aims and actions, determine whether it remains committed to the process it helped facilitate, and use its leverage accordingly.

The fragile Madhav Nepal-led ruling coalition faces a severe crisis of legitimacy and a belligerent Maoist opposition. The Maoists have boycotted the legislature-parliament, paralysing government business to the extent that the budget has not yet been passed. They have demanded a house discussion on President Ram Baran Yadav’s “unconstitutional action” over-riding the Maoist government’s decision to sack the then Army Chief General Rukmangad Katawal in early May — a demand rejected by the other parties in government who see no wrong in what the President did. The Maoists have also launched a street movement, with the slogan of instituting “civilian supremacy” and a “Maoist-led national government.”

The Constitution-writing process is in limbo, with the Constituent Assembly changing its timeline for the sixth time, raising serious doubts whether the statute can be prepared by May 2010. The peace process lies dormant, with little progress on the integration and rehabilitation of the Maoist People’s Liberation Army, presently in United Nations-supervised cantonments. The political polarisation in Kathmandu has left the state weak and unreformed, further fuelling semi-militant ethnic movements of Tharus in western Tarai, Madhesis in eastern Tarai, and Limbus in eastern hills. The Hindu. (Prashant Jha is a Kathmandu-based journalist.)

Maoists insurgents in Nepal and Naxalites in India. The Naxals control 40% of the land

This ever growing enmity will not allow Indian policymakers to make any concessions to the Nepali Maoists. Indian policymakers want the Maoists to kneel down, come to its terms of reference, and to hand them the job of running the country. The Nepali Maoists seem to have ditched that traditional style of ruling if their public rhetoric is anything to go by. There is no military solution to the problem. Delhi has tried it and failed. The Maoists took over Nepal and are gaining in strength in Bharat. Delhi finds itself in a fix. Given such a precarious situation, the question about who will blink first and how is important. If Maoists indeed succeed in toppling this government either by playing within the contradictions of colourful partners of the coalition or through a mass revolt, it’s not convincing that they may be able to run the country without India’s support. If they do have something of this sort in their mind, they must have done sufficient homework to rope in China into the country as never before.

Domestic roots

The present crisis, result of the ouster of the Maoists from the government in May, has domestic roots.

There is a deep trust deficit between Nepal’s older political parties and the Maoists. The former feel that the Maoists have not changed the ultimate aim of “state capture” and are not committed to multiparty democracy. The inability of these parties, both the Nepali Congress and the Communist Party of Nepal (Unified Marxist Leninist), to challenge the Maoists politically has added to their insecurity. The Maoists see the others as “stooges of feudals and reactionaries,” unable to reconcile themselves with the popular aspirations of change, and to accept that Maoists are legitimately the strongest political force in Nepal.

Add to this the trust deficit between the Maoists and the Nepal Army, especially under the previous chief, General Katawal, who the Maoists had sought to dismiss. The top brass of the army sees the Maoist intentions to integrate the PLA as an attempt to “politicise” and “take over” the army. Maoist dogmatists see the army as the final pillar of the old state that has to be reoriented drastically. The more moderate politicians, across the spectrum, recognise the need to “democratise the army” as stated by the peace accord, and “integrate” a part of the PLA — but then develop cold feet, fearing this would mean one less balancing force against the Maoists. The elevation of the more sober and restrained Chhatraman Singh Gurung as the first Janajati Chief of the Army this week has had a positive effect though, reducing tension levels.

It was this alliance of the parties and the army that led to the ouster of the Maoist government and the resulting stalemate. But India was at the centre of the crisis in May — actively opposing the Maoist move to dismiss the chief, backing the army, and then helping Madhav Nepal cobble together a majority in the house. The Indians had warned the Maoists not to “touch the army” and felt this was a Maoist move to take over all state institutions. New Delhi was increasingly uncomfortable with the Maoists’ increased engagement with China, the anti-India rhetoric of top Maoist leaders, and developed doubts about their commitment to democracy.

Since then, New Delhi has actively backed the present Madhav Nepal government — hosting him during a five-day India visit, telling interlocutors not to destabilise the present arrangement, and helping to smoothen intra-coalition differences.

New Delhi’s role

India has a choice. It can continue to let its suspicion of the Maoists be the over-riding objective of its Nepal policy, and see the country slide into confrontational politics and greater anarchy. Or it can seek to build bridges, and play a pro-active role in engineering the kind of consensus it has done since 2005 to veer Nepal back towards a stable trajectory. But for that, policymakers have to ask themselves difficult questions.

Is India still committed to Nepal’s Constitution-writing and peace process? If yes, how does it reconcile that with the opposition of powerful sections in the Indian establishment to the integration of even a part of the PLA in the Nepal Army, as stated in peace accords? Would they prefer the present drift where the country has two armies? Or are they banking on the PLA splintering off into lower level extremist groups, which looks unlikely given the strong chain of command and party discipline?

How does sustaining the present government aid the process? Does India recognise that as long as this government is in place, Maoists may not cooperate in drafting the Constitution, and without their numbers, no statute can be passed? What are the implications, for Nepal and for India, if the Constitution does not get written on time? In fact, how does encouraging a Kathmandu power structure that excludes the Maoists square up with the political reality on the ground where they are immensely strong?

How does fragmentation of the Madhesi mainstream political parties — recent moves by Delhi have added to their divisions — help the cause of stability in the Tarai? Does India still believe in using the Tarai and the Madhes movement as a counter to the Maoists and a strategic lever? Is there a recognition that continued semi-anarchy in the Tarai and a weak state right across the border could imperil India’s own security interests?

The point is not to place the onus on all that is happening in Nepal on India. Of course, domestic actors have been irresponsible. There is a deep disconnect between Maoist intentions, actions and rhetoric, and dogmatists within still dream of a communist republic. There is lack of clarity within the Nepali Congress and the UML. Factionalism is rampant. Short-term interest based politics has trumped the larger commitment to the process. And no solution can be imposed from outside.

Nirupama Rao will get acquainted with political actors, make the right noises, and back the present government during her Nepal stay. But her visit would be truly successful if she uses the trip to publicly reiterate New Delhi’s commitment and support to past political and peace agreements; tell all actors that no form of authoritarianism, right or left, is acceptable to India; build bridges with the Maoists; privately reassess India’s approach to the present power alignment; and encourage a creative roadmap to get the Nepali process back on track.

India is now trying to put in place a pro-Indian government and keep the Maoists out of power. This could be very dangerous, because it could lead of widespread Anti-Indian riots. Already the Indian companies working Nepal face an uphill battle. Various project have been put on hold and trade is in jeopardy.

Gen Hossain Mohammed Ershad, the first host of Saarc in 1985, said bluntly in a TV documentary sponsored by India’s foreign ministry that one of the main reasons for creating the grouping was that India’s smaller neighbours were ‘allergic’ to the big neighbour. ‘So we decided to bring everyone together to deal with the problem.’ Former US Senator and ex-ambassador to New Delhi Daniel Patrick Moynihan proclaimed that India is a big country, which behaves small.

I have yet to come across a serious, objective discussion in any of the newspapers why India’s neighbours are allergic to it. Instead of blaming Pakistan’s ISI sleuths who probably play a hand whenever they find an opening in determining or undermining India’s ties with its neighbours, would it not be useful for Indian intellectuals and analysts to have a meaningful discussion as to why India’s RAW or IB are unable to neutralise the damage? India helped create Bangladesh out of Pakistan, but Dhaka today has better ties with Islamabad than with New Delhi. Is it because of ISI alone? Buddhist Sri Lanka, Hindu Nepal, they all seem to have better ties with Pakistan than with India. Shouldn’t there be a commission of inquiry set up by India to investigate the lapses by its ministers, officials and sleuths that have brought the country to a pass that bewildered Moynihan? Dawn. Is India really a big nation, which behaves small? By Jawed Naqvi. Monday, 14 Sep, 2009 | 07:12 AM PST. jawednaqvi@gmail.com

Delhi is surrounded by problems of its own making. It is hated in South Asia for good reason. The “Indian Union” has had wars with all her neighbors, and it constantly interferes in the affairs of all of them. It calls all of them “failed states” proposing a raison d’etre under which it can absorb them into this huge behemoth called “Akhand Bharat“–an land mass which encompasses most of Asia– from Kabul in the West to a mystical land called Raj Kilhani, which is east of Bali in Indonesia. This is the “Bharat” that religious Bharatis dream of.

The ongoing political strife in nearby Nepal threatens to affect Indian companies working out of Nepal while India Inc continues to fight the global downturn. Hindustan Times

The Sri Lankans hate the Indians for supporting th the LTTE terrorists. The Bangladeshis are fed up with the “Rakhi Bahni” which tried to rule Bangladesh under an Indian general. The Burmese would rather be isolated than deal with a Delhi bent upon making it a protectorate, The Maldives almost drowning don’t want a lifeboat from Bharat. The Chinese have huge boundary disputes with Delhi. In the early days of independence Delhi thought that it could grab Tibet and thus bifurcate China into small pieces, perpetuating the colonial division of China. Mao Zedung would have none of that and took over Tibet, Aksai Chin and told Delhi to lay off Tibet. Then of course there are the Pakistanis, a huge impediment to Bharati hegemonistic designs in West Asia.

India is walking a diplomatic tightrope as Nepal tries to form a new government, aware that excessive meddling in its traditional “backyard” could risk pushing the fragile Himalayan democracy closer to China.

India has always seen Nepal as part of its strategic sphere of influence, but that has been challenged in the past year since the election of Maoist Prime Minister Prachanda, who before he resigned last week had edged closer to Beijing. India treads fine line in Nepal’s political crisis

Summary of the Book “India Doctrine” written by Barrister MBI Munshi

2009-10-25T10:27:00.001+05:45

Why is India worrired?

2009-10-15T11:33:00.000+05:45

Why are Indians worried about Chinese role in Nepal. Aren't they pushing China to play active role in Nepal? If they keep quite and do not interfare in Nepal they Nepal can also tel China not to interfare. The Indian interference is encouraging the Chinese and others to interfare in Nepal.
The government should strictly tell India not to interfare. So, that China will also not interfare otherwise Nepal will be play ground for Indian bastards and chinese and Americans.
Stop foreign interferance.
Stop Indian terrorists from encroaching Nepali land and request CIA to issue red corner notice against India, Indian prime minister and the Indian ambassodar in Nepal.
India is evil and a terrorist country and it is spreading terrorism in the whle South Asia. The RAW sponser terrorism has to be stopped, the interfarence has to be stopped and they should be exposed to the whole world that India is not a democratic country it is a terrorist country.
Declare India a terrorist country and issue red corner notice against the Indian leaders and Indian ambassodar in Nepal.
Indians killed the King Birendra and his family after he refused to pass the citizenship bill that would make the Biharis Nepalese. The Indian RAW kicked Gynandra after he also refused to give citizenship to Bihari in Tarai. The parties gave citizenship to lakhs of Biharis after Indian forced them. The Nepalese will be in minority in Nepal if the move continues as according to RAW plan. Thus the RAW propaganda machine The Himalayan Times and Annapurna Post and journalists like Rishi Dhamala and Ajaya Khanal and Jeewendra Simkhada should be immediately closed and arrested.

India’s chessboard politics is no longer relevant in Nepal

2009-09-15T14:52:00.000+05:45

S D Muni, considered to be one of the India’s foremost experts on Nepal, is a familiar figure in political circles here. Having completed his PhD on Nepal’s foreign policy in 1972, he taught for over 30 years at Delhi’s Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU) and published a number of books on Nepal, including one on the Maoist insurgency in 2003. He is currently Visiting Senior Research Fellow at the National University of Singapore (NUS). He was recently in Kathmandu on a research visit, during which Aditya Adhikari and Pranab Kharel of The Kathmandu Post met him to solicit his views on Nepal’s current political crisis, India’s policy regarding Nepal, and his views on perceptions towards him in Kathmandu.
(Muni is here in Kathmandu and Indian foreign secretary Nirupama Rao also arrived to force Nepal to sign controversial India-Nepal strip map that has nothing about Kaalapani and Susta and a huge portion of Nepal's land is shown in India. The other treaty that Rao is forcing is handing over all the people whom the terrorists and rapist Indians say they are criminal. first of all the Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and Rakesh Sood should be handed over to Interpol for their crime and rape against Nepalese on the borders and terrorizing the whole South Asia. The third issue oi Indian priests who loot the Nepalese and have been running hotels in India from the money of Nepal. Their loot should be immediately stopped and they should be kicked out of Nepal.)

Q: What are causes of the current problems in the peace process?
Muni: What has gone wrong is that once the Constituent Assembly (CA) elections took place, the basic consensus eroded. The elections were seen more as one for Parliament than for a CA. It was seen as a power exercise; the question was who would get to lead. Very unfortunately, the power sharing arrangement couldn’t be worked out. I still don’t buy that the principles [of the peace process] have been thrown out; people still talk about them, at least. What has really driven the parties apart from each other is the differences over power sharing. This happened because nobody expected the Maoists to get the number of seats that they did. Unfortunately the numbers they got were large, but not large enough to get an absolute majority. The interim Prime Minister G.P. Koirala refused to hand over power for four months or so, largely because he was thinking of ways to keep the Maoists out of power or under control. The Nepali Congress, in particular, was sure that it would remain in power. If the Maoists had gotten 50 seats less than they did, perhaps they would have managed to keep the Maoists on the fringe. The power arrangements still haven’t been settled since then.

Q: Do you feel that the process can’t move forward unless this arrangement is settled?
Muni: This is my fear. Politicians being politicians are wedded more to power and patronage, than to changing societies. In any case, the NC and the UML are not committed to an agenda to change society. And the Maoists are unduly, seriously committed to one. They don’t want to compromise on what they think should be the vision for the country. They have been very inept in understanding the reality that their emergence has not been digested, nor been reconciled to by the others. It is as much their responsibility to take others along, as much as the others responsibility to see that the Maoists get their feel in the politics of Nepal. Mainstreaming is not simply laying down arms. The Maoists need to feel a stake in the new system, which the other parties aren’t allowing them. Unless you have a stake, you can’t care less.
We have all been saying that the Maoists shouldn’t have opened all the fronts. They are total novices in managing the power components of a democratic political structure. They have never done it before. The vision that they developed in 10 years, they wanted to complete in a year. They antagonised the judiciary, the media, and the Army; that doesn’t work in a democratic structure. And I think they’ve gotten the shock of their lives.

Q: So you think the Maoists made a mistake in trying to sack (former) Chief of Army Staff Rookmangud Katawal?
Muni: Whatever General Katawal did was not all right. He needed to be put in his place. On the three or four counts on which he was asked to provide an explanation, he did not do it in a proper way. More than that, he went around town making political statements. If the same situation had arisen in India, the Army chief would go, not the cabinet. A very undemocratic precedent has been set. The political parties argue that if they hadn’t stopped the Maoists, they would have taken over power, but that is frankly all bullshit. If you’re saying that by integrating 5,000 people into an armed force of 100,000, the 5,000 will take over the entire Army, you’re talking rubbish.

Q: Do you have views on how the peace process could be brought back on track?
Muni: Today you have a very unfortunate situation. I am very worried about it. Anybody who is concerned about Nepal’s stability, security and progress should be worried about it. This situation is almost akin to the situation of 1994, when the Maoists had a minority group of 9 in parliament, but were nonetheless the third largest party after the NC and UML. These two parties united to suppress the Maoists and keep them on the margins, which drove them to 1996. If elections had taken place in 1994, and the Maoists had contested them and won some seats in parliament, at least the people’s war resolution would have been delayed. This situation exists today: the two mainstream parties have joined hands to marginalise them. But they cannot repeat the old story. There are solid reasons for that.

Q: What are the reasons?
Muni: Everybody is talking of two options. First, drive the Maoists to the wall. If need be, unleash the Army on them, with the help of India or the US. To my mind, this is a non-option. If India thinks the Maoists can be eliminated, then they should have been eliminated by 2005. What India or the US can do at best is provide arms, training, and political support. The fighting will have to be done by General Gurung’s men. In this situation, the Maoists would go to the international community as the people bring wronged, not as people wronging others. On the other hand, the Maoists say that they can go back to war and take over. But if they could, they would have taken over. Why did they talk to the political parties? Because they knew that the gun was not succeed in capturing the state and retaining it.
The other option is to evolve and recreate the consensus that is broken down. This is the only option left if Nepal is to be stable. Nepal must finish the task which it has taken. Many political leaders here are saying that we made a mistake in bringing the Maoists along. That is nonsense. Look at the Maoist organisation. It is an elite, educated Brahmin leadership, leading the marginalized Janajati, Madhesi, Tharu, and Dalit people. The bulk of the Maoists are a group of people who have felt that the Nepali state has been exploitative for years. This leadership has given them hope. You can throw this leadership out. You can eliminate Baburam and Prachanda either politically or physically. But these groups, which consist of over 40% of your population, have risen. Can you address this militarily?

Q: How is the Indian foreign policy establishment looking at Nepal right now?
Muni: There are two things I want to say. One, this India factor, which everyone is obsessed with, is exaggerated and is a result of the lack of unity in the political centre in Nepal. To give an example, King Mahendra was very clear about what he wanted to do. He couldn’t care less about India. For ten long years, there was no Indian interference, except for supporting what the King was doing. This was possible because the political centre in Nepal was united and focused. Also, the political centre was united on April 21, 2006, when Mr. Karan Singh came here and King Gyanendra passed the first declaration, which the political parties refused to accept. India wanted the declaration to be accepted by all the parties, tried its best to have it accepted. But it could not. After that, India did not want UNMIN in Nepal. But UNMIN came to Nepal. The real problem is not in India; it is here. India, as well as China and the US, will have their own strategic objectives here. They can become successful only because you are porous. If you are not porous, it won’t work.
Second, India is a huge country. On Nepal itself, there are diverse stakeholders. Many people don’t know this, but I will tell you a story that I saw unfold very closely. In 1989, Rajiv Gandhi took a certain decision and said that the trade treaty had not been renewed, therefore only two outlets [at the Nepal-India border] would be kept open. This created lots of problems here. In India, there were four sets of people that I know of that went to Rajiv Gandhi to say that what you’re doing is wrong. These groups included the Shankaracharyas, who said don’t do this because Nepal has a Hindu monarchy; old princely houses, who have matrimonial relations with the Shahs and Ranas here; the Army chief, General Sharma, who said that his Gurkha soldiers were suffering; and the business community, who went and said they were being affected.
So the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) has a Nepal policy. The Defence Ministry has a Nepal policy. The parties in which these old princely houses have good representation - the Congress, the BJP - have a Nepal policy. The actual policy that emerges is a synthesis depending on who is strong at what point in time. In addition, a major concern overriding all this is India’s security interest.
I have been writing that there is a new Nepal in transition. India, because of these various players, has been playing a kind of chessboard politics - placing people in different positions who can serve its interests. This chessboard politics is no longer relevant in Nepal. I think India should reorient its policy to the larger people’s interest. If you do this, then you will have a Nepal that is stable and progressing, and in the long run would cater to all Indian interests.

Q: Some people here accuse you of being prejudiced in favour of the Maoists.
Muni: I am very angry at these accusations. People here do not know my background. I heard yesterday that they still call me a RAW agent. I started working on Nepal in 1967. I have written four books on Nepal. I first came here in 1968, when B.P Koirala was being released. Girija Koirala took me to the Koirala niwas in Biratnagar; we flew together. That established our first relationship. Many people in Nepal don’t know this. They only know that Baburam Bhattarai was a student in JNU. They do not know that I was Sujata Koirala’s local guardian in Delhi. They don’t know that we were about to admit Prakash Koirala into JNU as a student. They don’t know that B.P. Koirala visited my house in JNU three or four times, and I must have visited him half a dozen times. They don’t know that Pushpalal and Sahana Pradhan - at that time she was not a politician, she was a teacher - visited my house for dinner in the 1970s. They don’t know that Rishikesh Shah and I were great friends. They don’t know that in 1990, Rishikesh Shah and I were at the forefront of articulating the views of the first Jana Andolan. I was not a politician, so we didn’t come into the movement like Yechury or D.P. Tripathy or Chandrasekhar, but we intellectually tried to challenge the monarchy. I was committed to democracy. It is because of this that the palace started to call me a RAW agent. They wanted to discredit my academic credentials.
Yes, I have been a republican. I was one in 1968, in 1991 and in 2005. If by that, you derive only the conclusion that I am a Maoist, please go ahead.

Q: What are your current academic focuses?
Muni: I have just finished a book India’s Foreign Policy: The Democracy Dimension. India has joined the International League for Democracy. We have been at the forefront of promoting democracy all over the world since 2002, since the Community for Democracy was established. I thought we should analyse how India’s policy on the ground has worked in favour of democracy or against it in other countries. The only area where India has been very active is in the immediate neighbourhood, from Afghanistan to Myanmar. That’s what the book is about. There is a lot about Nepal in it. The book will come out next month. The book is being published by Cambridge University Press, India.
The other book I have finished is SAARC: The Emerging Dimensions. This is an edited volume. The third book that is in progress in Singapore is on South Asian perceptions of Rising China.

RAW, terrorist and rapist Rakesh Sood, Pashupatinath row, Himalayan Times, Annapurnal Post

2009-09-06T18:30:00.000+05:45

The Pashupatinath priests row and Hindi language row in Nepal is a RAW agenda and it is propagated by some RAW paid journalists and the RAW propaganda machine Himalayan Times and Annapurna Post.
These are not the newspapers and as we have from the very begining maintained that they are directed by the RAW staff in Indian embassy.
On Wednesday, RAW staff from Indian Embassy and Himalayan Times RAW-supported journalists had meeting. Ajay Bhadra Khanal, Rajan Pokhrel, Kamal Acharya, Arjun Bhandari and the RAW agent Dhrub Painley were in the meeting on how to take the Hindi language row and Pashupatinath's Indian priest issue and highlight it to create divide in the Nepali society.
The analysis of the meeting was that the Indian game plan in Nepal is heading to success. The newspaper succeeded to create divide in the Madheshi and Pahade issue now the major issue is Hindu versus non-Hindu so that it would be easy for the Indian army to enter Nepal to maintain security.
They have been suceeded in creating more arms outfit in Terai with monetary and arms support from the Birgunj counsulate. Similar, they are now in the mission to have more journalists on their side to support their game plan.
They have started massive recruitment plan for the nepali journalists to write the news on their support.
The Indian ambassodar Rakesh Sood's threatening to Minendra Rijal and other ministers is another indication what is India planning in Nepal. The terrorist and rapist Sood's grand design is to turn Nepal into Adghanistan. He has to be expelled immediately for the security of the country.
According to the Indian agency's report also the armed outfits operating in Terai are supported by the Indian leaders and states, but the RAW and Indian central government has engineered it from the back.
Government should shut down Himalayan Times and Annapurna Post and arrest the RAW agents immediately for the security and sovereignty of Nepal.

Expel terrosist and rapist Rakesh Sood and all Indian Priests from Pashupati temple for the sovereignty of the country. It is the religious and linguistic colonialism, throw it.

What do Madheshi parties want?

2009-08-29T11:14:00.000+05:45

What do Madheshi parties want?
Do they want to divide this country like LETTE wanted in Sri Lanka, Then they are a gone case. Nepal will remain united and they will be finished like LETTE. Otherwise Nepali is the official language of Nepal and every citizen has to respect it. The mother, motherland and mother tongue is same. The Madheshi parties want to sell their mother for a few IC? or They think that Indian will let them to power by raising Hindi issue.
They should know that Hindi is discarded even in India. Hindi is not the issue madhesh parties are raising they are trying to appease the Indian establishment and sell their motherland for few ICs but tomorrow what answer do they give o their children, if there is no Nepal, there will be no Madhesh and no Mahanta Thakur and no Parmananda and Hridayeash or any one there will be only bihari yadavs and their dadagiri.

Save Nepal save Nepali. Lets remain united and don't fal in trap of the RAW trap that wants to divide Nepal.

Those five Madhesi parties that have jointly asked Vice President Parmananda Jha not to retake oath as ordered by the Supreme Court and not to quit from the post are and cannot be the sons of their fathers.

How can they ask Jha to wait until the Interim Constitution is amended to allow oath-taking in a preferred language. Tomorrow if anyone takes oath in Chinese how will you take it? Aren't you giving room for every foreigner to paly in this land? Why preferred language why not mother tongue?
You all matherchod..why do you want to fuck your mother and leek the boot of Indian bastards, they are blody rapist and terrorists. Theie SSB, police and Army have raped your daughters and wives and still your are leeking their boot instead of fucking their ass. Wake up and be Nepali and united.
The RAW propaganda machine Himalayan Times and annapurma Post is supporting te Hindi campaign because they are in Nepal to spy not to do journalism. They are here to keep record of every bureaucrats and politicians and their children so that they can be sent to scholarships to India and buy information.
These RAW propaganda machine should be banned and closed otherwise they will start disctribute money like the Indian consulate does in Birgunj and start protesting in kathmandu for Hindi and make this country another Bhutan.
Beware Madhesh leaders don't be fool.

India’s Hand in Nepalese Royal Palace Massacre

2009-08-27T18:50:00.000+05:45

ESSAY: India’s Hand in Nepalese Royal Palace Massacre- (II), 2001
Posted by barunroy on August 23, 2009

BY DIRGHA RAJ PRASAI

‘A little leak will sink a great ship.’ To much involving on Nepal’s internal issues is the big mistake of India. Since 1950 South Asia is in turmoil that India is taking the policy of aggressive intervention against the surrounding countries like Nepal, Bangaladesh, Srilanka and Pakistan. First of all, I request to judge the intention of India on Sikkim in 1974-1975. According to the hint of RAW, Sikkim’s Prime Minister the traitor Lendub Dorje, “appealed” to the Indian Parliament for representation and change of Sikkim’s status to a state of India. In April 1975 the Indian army moved into Sikkim, seizing the capital city of Gangtok, disarming the Palace Guards and putting the King Chogyal under forceful house arrest. The King Chogyal never renounced his throne and hoped till the end that justice would win. The Kingdom which had defended its independence for 300 years against powerful neighbors was annexed by India in April 1975 and became the 22nd state of the Indian Union. The misty was that in 10th April 1975 India annexed Sikkim by staging a dramatic statute assembly election by keeping the Sikkim King separate from sovereignty.

Similarly, Indian maintains its wish to keep Nepal under its security umbrella. India knows- Nepal could remain an independent and sovereign country only because of monarchy. Indian interest is not in favor of the Nepalese monarchy. So, everybody suspect the mysterious conspiracy on Royal Palace Massacre by RAW of India. Actually, We, Nepalese people regard Indian people, culture and traditions but not the intervention of Indian leaders. I am not bias and never minimizing the facts. We have to maintain friendly relations with India due to our similar cultural and religious traditions. But sadly, Indian Government ( Congress I) is going to destabilize Nepal through its Nepalese culprits leaders.

In Nepal, four years ago (2005), India had laden the Maoist rebellion along with Nepali Congress, UML and others with the 12-point agreement for so-called full democracy. That movement that ensued after the 12-point agreement was not for a republic state. In fact, the movement had stopped only with an agreement between the king and the political parties with the internal consent of the Maoists. After the agreement the king handed the power to the people, then, India committed to capture Nepal after declaring it republic (unconstitutionally, forcefully) through the so-called 601-members Constituent Assembly. Robbers, murderers and those wanted by the law were elected to the constituent assembly. There are some questions. How an election forced upon the country and done on the behest of foreigners can gain validity? As the party leaders and politicians do whatever the South Block and the RAW tell them? Yes, they are doing.

Even while walking on the path directed by RAW, Narayan Man Bijukchhe of Nepal Workers and Peasants Party, one among the seven parties, said India was exerting its influence on Nepal’s political, diplomatic, economic and social sectors. RAW is the main liaison to do this. Saroj Raj Adhikary has written in Nepal Saptahik, a weekly magazine, that ‘India, through RAW, is taking the disgruntled groups of the Terai as a medium to serve its political and economic interest in Nepal. RAW is active in Nepal for the last 40 years’. Jan Aastha, another Left weekly, writes: former Home Minister Krishna Prasad Sitaula is a man who has close contacts with the Indian intelligence network’. Similarly, whatever he says to former Prime Minister GP Koirala, Dr. Shekhar Koirala exports agents of Indian intelligence agency (26 Dec 2007). When the country is seized by these traitors how can there be peace? The traitors smashed the statues of late King Prithvi Narayan Shah (who unified Nepal before 250 years ago) and the greatest nationalist King Mahendra. Nepal is in a precarious juncture. Indian from the very beginning wants Nepalese industries to be closed. It desires to fail the state. The Delhi 12 points agreement 2005 has been the major cause to disintegrate Nepal. So, Nepalese people are ready to fight against the traitors & foreigner’s conspiracy.

Late His Majesty King Birendra strongly believed that “Nepal’s history and tradition have bound her people and Monarchy in an enduring and intimate relationship, injecting in the Institution an inherent feature of honoring and being guided by popular will and aspiration of the people”. Throughout his reign, the welfare of the people was always uppermost in his mind. He always endeavored to live up to their expectations and ensure a balanced all-round development. During his coronation in 1975, he declared free primary education throughout the country and also proposed that Nepal be declared a Zone of Peace. Including USA, 116 nations support the declaration of Zone of Peace but India denied. Nepal has ties with India since the Muslim rule there, but Nepal always faced threat from India. In the name of democracy (Indocracy), India always plays the Drama with the Nepalese agents.

The Nepalese people had to bear the sudden loss of their beloved ‘Monarch’ in a dreadful and unanticipated incident that occurred in the Narayanhity Royal Palace on 1st June 2001. His Royal Highness Crown Prince Dipendra (born 1971) was in a coma in hospital, was declared king. His Royal Highness Prince Gyanendra Bir Bikram Shah, brother of His late Majesty King Birendra was proclaimed regent in accordance with the Constitution of the Kingdom of Nepal – 1990. King Dipendra (at the age of 29) passed away the next day. According to the constitution, then, His Royal Highness Prince Gyanendra was proclaimed king of the Kingdom of Nepal.

The Crown prince Dipendra was fallen in love with Devyani. Being Devyani’s mother birth-place India (Gwaliyar) and her mother’s mother was lower Rana family, so the King & queen denied him to marry with Devyani. Then, Dependra became aggressive to his parents. In such condition, RAW penetrated in the story. RAW agents convinced Devyani to hypnotize Prince Dipendra so that he would kill his father and become the King himself. The Queen had proposed him to bring as a kept-wife. The mother of Devyani was also furious because she herself wanted to marry King Birendra in past. She was jealous to Queen Aiswarya and wanted her daughter to be queen of Nepal.

After the misfortune incident Dependra puzzled out and he was nervous. And he shouted himself by his left hand, because his eating & writing practice was by left hand. In that black night Prince Gyanendra was at Pokhara for the meeting of King Mahendra Trust for Nature Conservation.

This is open-secret that Prince Dipendra and Devyani were used by RAW in the Royal massacre. In massacre night (7-9 PM), she was in Dugad Niwas near by the Indian-Embassy at Lajimpat, and was asking the activities of Prince Dipendra to his ADC, Raju Karki, now he is in America. First of all, the PM Girija Prasad sent the message to Indian PM from the Army Hospital by telephone. But, just after the massacre, the next day, Devyani departed to Delhi when Girija was the powerful Prime minister. Mr. B. Dixit has commented – ‘The unsolved murder mystery of Indian PM Lal Bahadur Shastri (PM of India who was poisoned in Masco) and mystery of Royal Palace massacre may be hatched by RAW.’ (Janabhawana, Nepali weekly-10thAug.2009)

After publishing my article in News Blaze, Namrata Dongel comments in News Blaze, Newsletter- USA – 17th Aug 2009- ‘I saw a documentary on Discovery Channel on 16th august 2009 at around 6 pm, which was about the Royal Massascre. It has presented the story as recited by the eye witnesses and so called Relatives. The actors used in the story are Indians. It presented the views of some of the foreigners closely associated with Nepal, but it didn’t include any of the Nepali people except the King’s relatives. That’s why I thought it must be a work of some Indians to humiliate Nepal in front of the world.’ Similarly, Dibakar Pant (M.N. USA) comments in News Blaze -’I found his (D.R. Prasai) recent published article titled “India’s Hand in Nepal Royal Palace Massacre-2001 article based on historical and factual reality. Indeed, because of factual positions, dealings and doings, rapprochements and existing policy that India is seen playing with its neighbors, it itself is creating enough ground for a doubt on the issue raised by the writer.’

After the Massacre, Madhab Nepal, the leader of UML suggested to form an inquiry commission. But, after tomorrow he twisted his word, may be, according to the advice of RAW. This is to remember that Madhab nepal was nominated as member of then investigation team (on the leadership of Chief Justice), but he denied to take part. To create confusion in the Royal massacre phenomenon, the former PM and Maoist leader Prachanda, and the PM and UML leader Madhab nepal, have been making empty noises about the investigating of Royal massacre. Recently, a prominent Journalist Devprakash Tripathi has written in Ghatana Ra Bichar, Nepali weekly newspaper, all about the reality and conspiracy of the Royal Palace Massacre, pointing the another madness Tul Prasad Sherchan who was taking responsibility for the Palace Massacre. (12th Aug.2009)

After the Royal Palace Massacre, to diverse the blame to RAW, the Moaist leader Dr. Baburam Bhattarai wrote, according to the hint of P. Harmij (Nepal-Chief of RAW) that the King Gyanendra was responsible to create the Palace massacre, 2001. (Kantipur Nepali daily Nepali- 6th June 2001 (Bs 2058 Jestha 24) it is notable that after Royal Massacre P. Harmij appointed the Chief of RAW in India. Then, the demure start that the Palace massacre was created by King Gyanendra to capture regime. After the Royal Massacre-2001, the so-called People’s movement 2005, which was guided by RAW, was two vital agendas- one Republic and another Secular state. Then, RAW’s the Drama starts to disintegrate unity of the country.

It is necessary to quote S. D. Muni (Professor of J. N. U. and the policymaker of south block & the strategist of RAW ) in his article ‘Dealing with a new Nepal’ in ‘The Hindu’ Daily on 15th September 2008 has conceded that India had provided one billion rupees for running the agitation. ‘With those resources along with the guidelines of south-block, they could forge the mass movement. Recently (29 Jun 2009, The Kathmandu Post), then Indian foreign minister Pranab Mukharjee accepted that the Maoist party which was an extremist party and chose violence, was convinced by India and compelled to join mainstream politics. According to him, they also convinced other mainstream political parties (Nepali Congress, UML) to form government by including Maoist party also. Till then Maoist was protected and armed by Indians. Within a month of the conclusion of the people’s uprising on 19 May, 2005, Jug Suraiya (columnist) of ‘The Times of India’ (a newspaper run by RAW) had described, “India and China must divide and share Nepal as it has now become a failed state”. The culprit leaders (Congress, UML & Maoist) remained silent against the concerning game of the RAW strategy.

History says and everybody knows the monarchy is a symbol of Nepalese unity and nationality. In between the two big neighbors- China and India, the monarchy has been playing a balanced role. So, Nepalese monarchy is the most convincing identity of Nepal’s independence and democracy. King Gyanendra is also a most nationalist who can stand with cause and effect on national scenarios. But, the culprit’s leaders are going to support ethnicism based Federal structure in Nepal. Now, in Tarai, the Indian immigrants are active for caste-based Federal states- ‘one Madhesis one state with total autonomy’ to upset Nepalese unity.

The Indian Congress should not forget that due to RAW’s naked conspiracy angry-Panjabi and Sri Lankan people killed Indira Gandhi and Rajiv Gandhi. Why were Indian agents and Mujibar Rahaman (who was made the Bangladeshi president by ‘RAW’ after creation of Bangladesh by separating Pakistan in 1975) killed? The Indian Congress should also not forget the act of nationalist Bengalese against the disgusting conspiracy by ‘RAW’. Nepalese people within country or abroad will not keep on tolerating the continued intervention.

The 1 June 2001 incident had shocked the nation, besides their Majesties King Birendra and Queen Aishwarya, Their Royal Highnesses Prince Nirajan and Princess Sruti Rana along with five other Royal Family members and relatives lost their lives after being fatally wounded during a family gathering at the Narayanhity Royal Palace.
After ascending the throne on June 4, 2001, His Majesty King Gyanendra Bir Bikram Shah Dev had, through a Royal Proclamation, constituted a two-member high-level investigation committee comprising Chief Justice Keshav Prasad Upadhyaya and Speaker of the House of Representatives Tara Nath Ranabhat. In the report made public on June 14, 2001 after extensive investigations, the committee concluded that bullet injuries were the cause of death of all killed in the incident.
Summarizing the report at a press conference organized to make the report public, Speaker Ranabhat said the committee had found that gunshots fired by the then Crown Prince Dipendra caused the deaths of their late Majesties King Birendra and Queen Aishwarya and seven others. The heart-rending tragic incident underscored, once again, the unique bond that has always bound the institution of Monarchy and the Nepalese people. That is the reality and evidence of Palace massacre of Nepal -2001.

Madhav Kumar Nepal returns, Indians thrash Nepalese

2009-08-22T20:27:00.003+05:45

The day Madhav Kumar Nepal returned, the Indians thrashed Nepalese in the Nepal border. It is the present Prime Minister Madhav Kumar Nepal brought to Nepal.
Jai Ho Nepal.
The terrorists Indian will never learn. They repeate such incidents on Nepal border all the time and show their terrorists mentality.
Issue red corner notice for terrorists' leader Man Mohan Singh for terrorising the Nepales in bordering cities in Nepal and encroaching the Nepali land.

Madhav Nepal failed to warn terrorist Man Mohan Singh 'Stop speading terror in Nepal borders, 'behave well'

2009-08-22T17:11:00.003+05:45

Prime Minister Madhav Kumar Nepal has said one of the major concerns India has with Nepal is the flow of fake Indian currency to India through Nepal.
The other two concerns are Nepal’s being used for terrorist activities directed at India and the use of madrasas for anti-India activities. But Nepal failed to tell the terrorists and rapist Manmohan Singh that the Indian SSB and his chelas are terrorising the Nepalese in the border and helping criminal gangs by supplying arms to destabilize Nepal in the Terai.
All the Terai outfits are supported by India and Madhav Kumar Nepal failed to warn terrorist leader Man Mohan Singh that he better stop the arms supply to Terai criminals and direct their SSb to behave well with Nepalese.
According to estimates, four out of every thousand Indian Rs. 1,000 denomination notes are fake and Nepal is a major conduit for them. Indians themselves are involved in fake note trading.
Nepal also failed to warn terrorist Singh to stop RAW activities in Nepal and close Himalayan Times and Annapurna Post that is lobbying for Hindi in Nepal as their Game plan. The RAW officials in these supposedly newspapers are starting another operation in Terai. They are planning to publish newspaper in Hindi from Biratnagar to divide Nepal according to RAW's Game Plan.
Down with Indian hegemony. Nepal will always remain united and strong. The RAW conspirators will be arerested and sent back to India, if they donot stop their criminal activities under the cover of newspapers and journalism, the Nepalese will padlock these RAW agencies and arrest bloody Indians.

Indian Embassy don't meddle in nepali affair

2009-08-17T21:00:00.000+05:45

With the backing of Indian embassy and Rakesh Sood, Paramananda Jha is still disobeying the Supreme COurt and the government. It shows that Jha is mad and how can a mentally sick person be a vice-president?
He has to pay back all teh salaries and benefits he took during his illegal and unconstitutional stay in the post. It proves that he is not nepali he doesnot obey Nepal's constitution and law.
Therefore he is Indian son of a bitch like Rakesh Sood and mad. all Indian are mad and Jha is also mad. He knows only money and if he gets money he will sell his daughter, wife and even mother like Rakesh Sood and all Indians daughter seller, wife seller and mother sellers terrorists.
Down with criminal and terrorist Jha.
Down with Indian terrorists.
The terrorist Indian have run newspapers funded by RAW. and that has not published this news because they are planning to publish a hindi newspaper in Nepal from Terai to fuel the Madheshi pahade politics that was not heard before the RAW-propaganda machine Himalayan times and Annapurna Post came to Nepal in 2002.
Jha is every day in contact with the RAW personal in Himalayan Times in Anamnagar for next move because his moves is directed from the apca house and the RAw personal working in apca in the name of journalists.

Read the sample of Jha's madness:

Taking oath in Nepali a must for Jha: Govt
BIMAL GAUTAM

(Updated with details)

KATHMANDU, Aug 17: Following a long-standing row over oath-taking by Vice President Paramananda Jha, a cabinet meeting on Monday requested Jha to take his oath of office and secrecy as vice president in the Nepali language as ordered by the Supreme Court.
The cabinet meeting took a decision to this effect with a view to respecting the SC ruling and urged Jha to abide by that ruling.
Minister for Law and Justice Prem Bahadur Singh said Monday´s cabinet meeting took three key decisions concerning the oath row. First, it decided to ask Jha in writing to respect the court´s verdict and take the oath in Nepali while also urging him to forward his consent over the issue to the government.
The cabinet likewise sought his consent on a time schedule for oath-taking in Nepali.
Secondly, the cabinet decided to furnish the government´s reply to the apex court regarding preparations for administering oath to Jha in Nepali as required by the SC. Thirdly, the cabinet decided to table a bill to amend the interim constitution and ensure the right to take one´s oath in one´s mother tongue if and when needed.
The SC had last week ordered the government, President Ram Baran Yadav and Vice President Jha to furnish their replies to the apex court on preparations being made for administering the oath to Jha in Nepali as per the provision of the interim constitution and the ruling of the court.
“The cabinet meeting reached the conclusion that everybody should respect the court´s ruling and decided to resolve the controversy over Jha´s oath-taking accordingly,” Law Minister Singh said, adding, “As per the cabinet decision, the government on Monday sent a letter to Jha seeking his reply whether he is ready to act according to that decision.”
Minister Singh informed that the government also sent a letter to President Dr. Ram Baran Yadav, attached to a copy of the government decision regarding the issue.
The letter was sent to President Yadav in reply to the letter sent earlier to the government seeking information on the latter´s preparations.
Meanwhile, the cabinet also decided to furnish a reply to the SC through the Office of the Attorney General. “The government is committed to respecting and following the SC verdict and administer oath to Jha in Nepali and preparations are going on accordingly,” Singh said quoting the reply sent to the court.
The Office of the Prime Minister and Council of Ministers sent the reply to the SC immediately after the cabinet decision Monday. In its reply to the court the prime minister´s office has also enclosed a copy of the decision sent to Jha.
Meanwhile Jha said that he will decide whether or not to take oath in Nepali after formally receiving the cabinet´s decision. "Let the government decide what it wants; I will take my own decision later", Jha told myrepublica.com.
Seventh amendment to constitution. Why do we need amendmend now, aren't we goping to write constitution.
The best solution and to make Madheshi Gaddhars why not make rakesh sood vice-president. Hridayesh Tripathi and all yadavs will be very happy but will a country run like this. Where were these Madheshi right vocalists when King was in power and they were also in government and looting Nepalese money.

RAW report on Parmananda Jha

2009-08-13T13:10:00.000+05:45

The government of a Indian stoog Madha Kumar Nepal is ready to compromise with Gushananda the son of a bitch Parmananda Jha because it is anti-Nepal and an agent of India. Madhav Kumar Nepal and his cabinet is not obeying the Supreme Court Order and is trying to find the illegal and unconstitutional day to save Jha. WHY?
How much money Parmananda Jha paid tyo Madhav Kumar Nepal to keep him as vice-president?
How much Indian embassy and the rapist, terrororist and murderer Rakesh Sood forced Madhav Kumar Nepal?
Is Madhav Kumar Nepal a real son of his father or is he an Indian's illegal son?
Why is the government likely to move Supreme Court on veep oath row as reported by the RAW propaganda machine Himalayan times,
Shut down such RAW machinary to save Nepal.
here is what RAW reports in HImalayan Times,,

An informal meeting of nine ruling parties today discussed the possibility of requesting the Supreme Court to review its latest decision on Vice President Parmananda Jha’s oath taken in Hindi last year.
The meeting also explored the possibility of amending the interim constitution to ensure that a person holding a constitutional position could take the oath of office and secrecy in a language of his/her choice.
The meeting, chaired by Prime Minister Madhav Kumar Nepal at the PMO in Singha Durbar and attended by the ruling partners, mainly focussed on the political crisis resulting from the apex court’s latest verdict on Jha’s oath. According to the interim constitution, the President and Vice-President should take oath in Nepali. The apex court termed Jha’s oath unconstitutional.
Sadbhavana Party chief Rajendra Mahato, who is also the Minister for Commerce and Industries, told mediapersons at the end of the meeting that the Supreme Court could be asked to review its verdict against the vice-president and the interim constitution could be amended to make sure that a person holding such a high post could take the oath of office and secrecy in the language of his/her choice. He claimed that the parties had reached a theoretical understanding to pursue both the options.
CP Mainlai, general secretary of the ruling CPN-ML, however, said nothing was discussed on that lines. He said a 22-party meeting scheduled for Friday morning might discuss the issue. Mainali added that the Madhes-based parties could come up with a proposal to this effect. But the parties, other than NC nad UML, are believed to have opposed amending the interim constitution and have objected to the idea of asking the apex court to review its decision.
Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Works and Physical Planning Bijaya Kumar Gachhadar also said there were only options for the government to settle the row between the Supreme Court and the Vice-President. A UML source said it was Vice President Jha who should appeal to the apex court for reviewing its verdict against him.

SC wants govt to explain its inaction

KATHMANDU: The Supreme Court today directed the government to explain why fresh ceremony to administer the oath of office and secrecy to Vice President Parmananda Jha had not been held.
The apex court also told the government authorities ‘ the Office of the President, the Office of the Vice-President and the Office of the Prime Minister and Cabinet ‘ to explain within seven days whether the Vice President is ready to take fresh oath in Nepali or not. The bench has scheduled the final hearing on August 23.
A full bench of Justices Top Bahadur Magar, Ram Kumar Prasad Saha, Kalyan Shrestha, Prem Sharma and Bharat Raj Uprety directed the government to explain why its verdict issued
on July 24 had not been implemented.
The apex court asked the government what initiatives it had taken in order to implement the verdict.
The bench added that the Vice President had to take oath in Nepali before assuming office as per Article 36 (I) (2) Schedule 1A of the interim constitution.
Jha could not be contacted for comments. However, his legal counsel Mithilesh Kumar Singh said Jha was not ready to take oath in Nepali.

India's Hand in Nepal Royal Palace Massacre

2009-08-10T18:54:00.002+05:45

By Dirgha Raj Prasai

South Asia is in turmoil over India taking the policy of aggressive intervention against surrounding countries like Nepal, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and Pakistan.
The task to destabilize these countries has been assigned to the notorious intelligence agency, RAW. A scholar Dr. Shreen M Mazari says "In Nepal, India has been intervening in the politics of the Hindu Kingdom by promoting pro-Indian politicians".
The Indian government is making it difficult for Nepal to assert her sovereignty. The Indian intelligence service Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) has been fomenting violent deterioration in Nepal. In Nepal, Indian leaders especially the government of Congress (I) have been playing an active role to diffuse the democratic aspirations of the Nepalese people. In 1989, India imposed an economic blockade on Nepal.
The reason was the expiring of the Trade and Transit Treaty. After the blockade, India had asked King Birendra to remain under the Indian security umbrella by enjoying the same status as the Bhutani King. But the sovereign Nepalese King Birendra rejected the Indian interest. Then, India started the conspiracy against Nepal.
Some Indian leaders & RAW have been instigating the Madhesi people (some puppets of India) of the Tarai - southern belt. The Indian ambassador has been offering large sums of money for schools, hospitals, roads etc in order to wean the masses away from the influence of Kathmandu.
The Tarai belt is burning with murders, kidnappings, lootings that is mounting day by day in the name of so-called 'Madhesi supremacy'. Since 2000 AD, India wanted to abolish the Nepalese monarchy any way it could. The Nepalese monarchy is the convincing factor of Nepalese unity & sovereignty. But India does not like peaceful unity and an inseparable Nepal. So, Indian Congress (I) leaders and RAW chief came to Nepal and used pressure to get rid of the monarchy. At that point, the grand design started with the Royal massacre.
The main cause is the conspiracy of RAW (Research and Analysis Wing). RAW has been destabilizing Nepalese unity since 2005. Professor Wang Hongwei of the Chinese Academy of Social sciences is a veteran Nepal watcher made these remarks. 'I firmly believe that Birendra's affiliation with China finally became the prime reason for his ghastly murder, some power centers did not want late King Birendra to have good relations with China'. 'Birendra was committed to serve his country, he had brought new ideas of cooperation with China, King Birendra believed that if Nepal is linked to the Silk Route, the country can have direct links to Europe and other countries mainly to import petroleum products'. 'That is the prime reason why those alien power centers did not want him to survive'.
'We had told him to remain careful while he was attending the BAO Summit held in China some years back'. 'We had saved his life earlier as well; one of our Military attaché had informed him of such ill motives. It was since then he had friendly relations with China, however, we came to know at a later stage that some diplomats stationed in Kathmandu and leaders of some political parties too acted as accomplices in the murder'. Professor Wang confirmed that RAW was responsible for the Royal massacre.
How mysterious it is? In my analysis, Prince Dipendra & Devyani (Daughter of Pashupati Shamshre) were used by RAW in the Royal massacre. On the night of the massacre (7-9 PM), she was in Dugad Niwas near by the Indian-Embassy at Lajimpat, and was asking about the activities of Prince Dipendra to his ADC.
This is an open-secret. But, just after the Royal massacre, the next day, Devyani departed to Delhi when Girija was the powerful Prime minister. That is the suspicious reality. The former PM and Maoist leader Prachanda, and the PM and UML leader Madhab Nepal, have been making empty noises about the investigating of Royal massacre. Remember that Madhab Nepal was nominated as a member of the investigation team (on the leadership of Chief Justice), but he refused to take part. Why is that? Because the culprit party leaders would not undergo an exercise in futility?

Royal Palace of Nepal
A prominent editor of Peoples Review (24 July 2009) Mr. Pushpa Raj Pradhan writes - 'The Royal Palace bloodbath on 1 June, 2001 will remain as a black-day for Nepalis in history. The entire family members of King Birendra along with many members of the Royal Family were killed in that incident.'
According to the noted scholar Dr Upendra Gautam, King Birendra was killed 19 days after signing an agreement for the Rasuwagadhi-Safrubeshi road, an access road linking Tibet with Nepal. Furthermore, he was killed immediately after his official visit to China. King Birendra, during those last days, was very unhappy with the increasing Indian intervention in Nepal.
According to Janadharana weekly, who had been closely monitoring the developments in Nepal, the Royal Palace bloodbath was carried out by those elements who didn't want Nepal remaining as a sovereign nation. The late king Birendra had strong relations with China. He was assassinated immediately after his return from China. He had participated in the international summit at the Bao Forum, Hainan, China in 2001.
India had become further suspicious of King Birendra's visit to China. Just before the bloodbath, Indian intelligence had made public a report in which a fake allegation was made that Queen Aishwarya had provided 100 million Indian rupees to the Tamil Tigers to assassinate Indian Prime Minister Rajeev Gandhi. It can be assumed that from such a serious accusation made against the Royal Family, how much the Indians were annoyed with the Royal Palace? This can be taken as evidence that Indians were trying to abolish the respected institution of a neighbouring country.
India was demanding that Nepal should provide citizenship certificates to all Indians residing in Nepal. India had already bought all the parliament members to fulfill this cause. A bill on the amendment of the citizenship law was also passed by the Parliament. But King Birendra had rejected the bill which made India more angry with the monarchy in Nepal.
That is the reality of the massacre of King Birendra and his family. Who can avoid the degrees of fate? The history of Indian conspiracy is the destruction of sovereign nations of south Asia. India should understand that the Nepalese people will never accept Indian interference.
According to former Prime Minister Marichman Singh, at the time of the movement of 1990, RAW brought together one dozen left parties who never used to see eye to eye, just like the seven parties during 2005 and of course, forged a working alliance with the Nepali Congress. Thinking that the Nepalese people would not hit the streets, India even brought 6,000 Bhutanese of Nepalese origin to Kathmandu to show Nepali faces in the movement. It is already published that after the movement of 1990 gained momentum, the then Indian Foreign Secretary, showing the scare of the people's movement, came to Kathmandu in April 1990 with a draft agreement under which Nepal's defense and foreign policy would be under the Indian domain. But King Birendra rejected the agreement outright. Many people believe that this was another step towards his untimely demise.
The reality is that India still maintains its wish to keep Nepal under its security umbrella. Now it is well established that India, after 2005, is stepping towards Bhutanisation, Sikkimisation and Fijisation of Nepal by using Prachanda and Baburam Bhattarai of Maoist, Girija of NC, Madhab Nepal of UML. All the conspiracy is being done in the name of abolition of monarchy. Therefore, in the absence of a leader who can take a stance, India conspires to make Nepal a failed state.
The Nepalese monarchy is the pillar of Nepalese identity and sovereignty. The Royal institution of Nepal is for its people and a force that fought against the imperialists. India had been investing to establish a republic in Nepal with the help of our corrupt party leaders as well as the palace's corrupt cronies and sycophants. So, everybody can understand the story of Royal massacre.

(Dirgha Raj Prasai is a former Member of Parliament, who writes from Kathmandu, Nepal.)

Air India to have own security check at TIA

2009-08-08T13:28:00.000+05:45

Air India to have own security check at TIA
Maoist minister gave permission
BIMAL GAUTAM & KOSH RAJ KOIRALA

KATHMANDU, Aug 8: The government has given permission to Air India (AI) to operate its own security checking at the tarmac of Tribhuvan International Airport (TIA).

The government is currently working on the Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) for such security checks by officials of a foreign airline at the country´s only international airport. Once the procedures are ready, AI will be allowed to basically second-screen passengers and luggage with portable x-ray machines in the sterilized zone of the tarmac. Currently, officials of the Indian airline are only allowed to carry out manual-frisking of passengers at the ladder of the airplane.

The decision to grant such permission was taken by then Minister for Tourism and Civil Aviation Hisila Yami under a written request from the government of India despite stiff opposition by then secretary at the ministry, Lila Mani Poudel. Secretary Poudel was transferred to another ministry before Yami took the final decision.

Talking to myrepublica.com, Yami admitted that she had taken such a decision. “Yes, I granted such permission to AI during my tenure," she said.

Though such a practice is not new, aviation experts have opposed the permission on three grounds. First, it somehow undermines the sovereignty of the nation. Second, it may compromise the security sensitivity of other airlines since it provides "unrestricted mobility" to the security officials of IA. And third, this could prompt other international airlines to demand such permission also, thereby creating a logistical problem of space. Jet Airways has already applied for a similar facility.

But both Yami and current secretary at the Ministry of Tourism and Civil Aviation Nagendra Ghimire defend the decision.

“I don´t think it undermines our sovereignty and national security,” said Yami. She, however, expressed unawareness of the unrestricted mobility for AI´s security officials or the other technical details of such a system. “I agreed to allow such a facility based on information provided by ministry staff,” she said, adding, “I could have been misled but still I don´t think I made a wrong decision.”

Secretary Ghimire said the mobility of airline officials in sensitive zones at airports is not a new thing in international aviation. “Such provisions exist in other countries too,” he argued.

However, there is a serious difference of opinion at the National Aviation Security Committee (NASC), which finalizes the SOP, on the implications of providing such a facility to a foreign airline. A meeting of the NASC held last Saturday could not finalize the procedures due to serious differences.

NASC, a body under the Civil Aviation Authority of Nepal (CAAN), is headed by the line minister and includes the Nepal Army´s second-in-command, the chiefs of the Nepal Police, the Armed Police Force and the National Investigation Department (NID), the secretaries from the Home, Defense, Law and Finance Ministries, the Attorney General and the Director General of CAAN.

India had long been asking Nepal for such a facility, arguing that India-bound flights from Kathmandu were under serious security threat, especially since the hijacking of Indian Airlines flight IC-814 on December 24, 1999.

Indian killed in an accident what a good omen !!!

2009-08-05T12:22:00.004+05:45

Five Indian nationals and one Nepali were mowed down and killed by a speeding car in the capital at 12:45 a.m., Wednesday. The car was being driven recklessly by a youth and there were two other people in it.
Those killed have been identified as Dharma Nath Singh, 50, and his wife Beena Singh, 46, of Kasawa Mehasi. Others killed were Madan Kumar Gupta, 29, Krishna Devi Gupta, 40, and her son Sanjay Gupta, 15, of Sitamarhi, Bihar.
All of them lived at Jyatha in rented quarters. The Nepali killed has been identified as 17-year-old Sujan Shrestha of Pokhare VDC-9, Sindhupalchowk district. Shrestha, who used to to work at a saree shop at Bhedasingh in the capital, was a passerby not associated with the Indian nationals.
Dipak Gupta, 28, also of Sitamarhi, who was injured during the accident, is being treated at Bir Hospital. He received serious injuries to the head and underwent surgery at Neuro Hospital, Bansbari. He is a relative of the victims and lives at Bangemudha in the capital.
According to police, Biplab Man Singh, 21, of Khichapokhari in Kathmandu was driving the Honda City Ba 4 Cha 8030 at considerable speed when it hit the people walking along the sidewalk.
They were returning from Bir Hospital after getting treatment for Sanjaya. The car crashed onto the pavement in front of the underground passageway at Bhotahiti. The front, back and right sides of the car have been damaged, indicating the severity of the impact.
Three youths including Singh left the car and fled the scene immediately after the accident. The car is registered in the name of Singh´s mother. It is not known whether the three were drunk.
According to security guard at Bir Hospital Hari KC, the Indians had visited the hospital at 10 p.m. Tuesday to get Sanjaya a checkup. They left at 12.30 a.m., Wednesday.
Soon after KC heard a loud noise 15 minutes after they left, police brought the victims to the hospital. All six died within minutes of reaching the emergency ward.
The absconding driver´s father and brother later surrendered themselves before the police. According to police, the father, Bidhya Man Singh, has agreed to provide compensation to the families of the victims and help police arrest his son. The family has also deposited Rs 100,000 at the Neuro Hospital for the injured´s treatment.
Indians should be kicked out of Nepal.

Indian criminals add to Tarai security woes

2009-08-02T17:22:00.001+05:45

Indian criminals add to Tarai security woes
KOSH RAJ KOIRALA

KATHMANDU, Aug 2: The influx of criminal gangs into southern parts of Nepal from Indian territory and particularly from Bihar state has increased lately following massive crackdown by police across the border.

Highly-placed sources at the Home Ministry said that a large number of gangsters is learnt to be taking refuge in bordering villages of southern Nepal---thanks largely to tough security measures adopted by the Nitish Kumar government to contain crime in Bihar.

“Though it is not a new trend for criminals from either country to flee across border, the numbers of those coming into Nepal from bordering areas in India have gone up lately,” said a senior official at the ministry. “We have reports that criminals fleeing Bihar to evade police action are currently taking refuge in bordering villages in Nepal.”

Maoist-infested Indian states have also stepped up efforts to bolster law and order.

Senior police officials say the increased influx of Indian criminal gangs has created additional security woes in the already troubled Tarai districts, particularly Siraha, Saptari, Mahottari, Dhanusha, Bara, Parsa and Rautahat.

Police believe that armed groups active in the Tarai employ the criminals to carry out kidnappings, extortions and even killings as they are professional criminals. Bihar is considered notorious for kidnappings.

With a view to curbing cross-border crime, the government recently set up Border Observation Posts of the Armed Police Force (APF) in all the bordering Tarai districts. The Indian authorities have also deployed a large number of border security forces along the Indo-Nepal border.

Nevertheless, there is no respite from the infiltration of criminal gangs-thanks to the open border that India and Nepal share.

“The border police outposts are stationed mostly at points where there is a motorable road,” said Deputy Inspector General of Police Bhisma Prasain, chief of Eastern Regional Police Headquarters, Biratnagar. “Criminals often walk in where border outposts are not located.”

According to DIG Prasain, intelligence reports show an influx of criminals from across the border from Banke in the west to Jhapa in the east. “Police officials in bordering districts have expedited meetings with their Indian counterparts to share information about such criminals,” he added.

What is interesting, according to police officials, is that the number of armed robberies in the Tarai has gone down dramatically in recent months.

There were only two cases of armed robbery each in Siraha and Saptari ---the most troubled districts---in the past seven months. While Dhanusha district saw no armed robbery during the period, Mahottari, Sarlahi, Rautahat, Bara and Parsa districts witnessed 5, 6, 2, 2 and 3 armed robberies respectively.

Officials believe there is a direct relationship between increase in the activities of armed ´political´ groups and reduction in the instances of armed robbery.

“We do have credible evidence that criminal groups are engaged in kidnappings and extortions in the guise of political groups as this involves less risk than armed robbery,” a senior official at the Home Ministry said.

The Indian Game Plan to stage Military Coup

2009-07-22T12:45:00.000+05:45

The Indian Game Plan to stage Military Coup and its Nepalese agents K P Oli and Bidhya Bhandari, the RAW agents and the murderers of Madan Bhandari are asking armsw alms to India as suggested by India and Nepal army to stage military Coup,
beware,

Visiting Nepalese Defence Minister Bidhya Bhandari met with Indian foreign and defence ministers and foreign secretary separately in New Delhi on Tuesday.
Bhandari arrived in Delhi on Monday in a bid to ask the Indian government to resume military assistance to the country. She said they assured her that India was ready to assist Nepal as per the country's needs.
“I asked them to continue assistance in the military sector in the same way that they are helping us in health and education sectors. I am not here with a specific agenda. I simply asked for resumption of military assistance”.
According to Bhandari, the Indian leaders inquired about the ongoing peace process and drafting of the new constitution. She, however, said she did not discuss integration of Maoist combatants, an important part of the peace process.

Declare India a terrorist country and issue red corner notice against Manmohan Singh, Shiv Shankar Menon and Rakesh Sood

2009-07-13T16:30:00.001+05:45

This is another example Indian hegemony.
At the liquid situation the Indian minister wants to build High dam in Koshi.
Last year due to Indian carelessness the dam was burst and Nepalese lost their lives. But still India is playing dirty game and wants high dam to inundate Nepalese land.
The Indians are terrorists and rapist. Biren Pradhan is another example of terrorist and rapist criminal Indian. every Indian a criminal and rapist and terrorist. Declare India a terrorist nation and issue red corner notice against manmohan Singh, Shiv Shankar Menon and Rakesh sood.
Here is the news of another terrorist Indian,

India is concerned about long-term for Koshi: Bansal
India's Minister for Water Resource and Parliamentary Affairs Pawan Kumar Bansal, who inspected the Koshi breach area in Sunsari and the reconstruction works at the dam Sunday, has said India is concerned about the long-term solution for Koshi.
Minister for Irrigation Bal Krishna Khand and visiting Indian Minister...
Addressing a press conference in the capital after the inspection visit, Bansal said India is serious about the problems caused by Koshi dam and informed that concerned authorities have been directed to take up all necessary measures including reconstruction works at the Koshi dam.
Hinting at India's interest in a high dam in Koshi, as a long-term solution to flooding which last year caused massive destruction and displacements in Nepal and India's Bihar, Bansal said India is also 'concerned' about the high dam and the study on its possibility is underway.
The Indian delegation led by Bansal visited the Koshi area in the morning. Nepal's Minister for Irrigation Bal Krishna Khand and Indian ambassador Rakesh Sood also accompanied the inspection team.
The Indian delegation that arrived in Kathmandu Saturday left for New Delhi this evening.

What is the similarity among Rishi Dhamala, Ajay Bhadra Khanal, jeewendra Simkhada and Merina shakya?
They all help rapist, murderer and terrorist Indian like Biren Pradha.
Rishi, Ajay and Jeewendra are RAW agents helping Indians rape Nepaese and terrorisr and murder Nepalese.
Arrest them and punish them.
Ban RAW propaganda machine Himalayan Times and Annapurna Post.
Declare Indis a terrorist country and issue red corner notice against Man Mohan Singh, Shiv Shamkar Menon and Rakesh Sood and Biren Pradhan.

Another terrorist and rapist Indian coming to Nepal

2009-06-18T12:01:00.002+05:45

Another terrorist and rapist Indian Menon coming to Nepal show him black flag and greet him with garlend of shoes,

The Indian Osama Bin laden Manmohan Singh and his accomplice Rakesh Sood are active in raping Nepalese and the other rapist terrorist Menon is coming to Nepal greet him with black flag and garlends of shoes.
The UML is the Indian RAW agency-run party that would not protest the Indian aggression and rape and terrorism but all the Nepalese should protest against the terrorist junior Osama Bin Laden called Menon and his side kicj Rakesh Sood, who has to be issued red corner notice for raping nepalese in dang, bara, and kalapani and many places in Nepal and for murder of Madan Bhandari and King Birendra's family.
Arrest terrorists Manmohan Singh, rakesh sood and Shiv Shankar Menon and frile case against them in the international court. They are Osama Bin Laden's blod brothers. At least Osama confesses his act but they deny their heniuos crime against sovereign country Nepal and Nepalese.

EXpand the global network against Indian aggression and expose Indian Osama Bin Laden

2009-06-17T12:24:00.001+05:45

Dear friens,

We have to expand this global campaign and expose Manmohan Singh, the new avatars of Osama Bin Laden and Terrorist country India, the new Taliban state in South Asia.
The Indian atrocities is increasing day by day and the Nepali government is engaged in power sharing, Shame on you Madhav Nepal, Girija Prasad and Bijaya Gachhedhar and Upendra yadav. These osn of bitches called yadav and Mahant Thaku want one madhes but when Indian SSb rapes Nepali daughters they don't speak that proves that they are Indian puppet like Madhav Nepal and Girija Prasad.
Shame on You, Ranm Sharan, how about if somebody rapes your wife and daughter? Still you save Indians for power or act against the rapist? Tryu to learn th eleswsons from History otherwise Nepalese people will kick you out of country and you have no right to be minister. If you are Indian dalal go to Indis present your wife to be raped by SSB and become Indian minister, don't you dare to challenge Nepalese sentiment, you asshole son of a bithc,

kaalbhiarav.blogspot.com and the global day against Indian aggression team is researching on the nepalese politicians and their childrens and wives relationships with Indian institutions and where they work except the Indian dalal nepalese journalists of Himalayan Times and Annapurna Post and other media houses and Journalists like Gpal Budhathoki who only writes about Kantipur and Nagarik and otyher newspapers but never writes about the RAW sponsered Himalayan Times and Annapurn Post and its journalists and RAW agents who work in these papers posing as journalists, Why Gopal Budhathoki, how much do you get monthly from the Indian embassy?
We are investigating you and your background also.

Global day Against Indian Aggression team

Open letter to Ban Ki Moon, the Un general secretary

2009-06-17T12:20:00.003+05:45

OPEN LETTER TO U.N. SECRETARY-GENERAL ON INDIAN ENCORACHMENT OF NEPALI LAND

June 15, 2009

His Excellency Ban Ki-moon
Secretary-General
The United Nations
1 United Nations Plaza
New York, New York 10017-3515

Your Excellency,

As a group of Nepalese living in New York, we beseech the prompt attention of the United Nations on the recent encroachment of Nepali land by India in Dang district of Nepal, which turned out to be one of the gravest violations of not only the national sovereignty of Nepal but also a tragic and shameful incursion of the big neighbor into human rights of a large number of people directly victimized by the Surakshya Seema Bal (SSB) of the Indian armed forces.

The truth, vehemently denied by the Indian Government as it has historically in such cases, is based more than on the stories of the victims as reported in the newspapers – it is officially confirmed by the recent findings of the parliamentary committees of the Constituent Assembly of Nepal. A part of the fresh and direct synopsis of the recently reported truth runs as:

“The separate delegations of the Constituent Assembly and legislature parliament have concluded that Nepali has been encroached by India in Dang district.

The CA team was lead by Amik Sherchan, chairman of the Committee for Protection of National Interest while the parliamentary delegation was headed by Padma Lal Biswakarma, chairman of the International Relations and Human Rights Committee.

Organizing a press conference in Dang Saturday, the all-party CA inspection team urged the government to start rehabilitation of those displaced due to unruly acts of the Indian border security officials, provide them relief support and seek lasting solution to the recurrent border disputes.”

Source: Nepalnews.com (June 13, 2009)

The highly commendable work of the United Nations Mission in Nepal in restoring the peace in the Himalayan country has unquestionably enriched the glory of the globally esteemed organization that you represent at the highest level. At this critical juncture, when Nepal’s peace process seems to be at stake, we place our faith in you for nurturing the dignity of the world body through

Urgently setting up an impartial international task-force to investigate the encroachment of Nepali land by India currently and in the past
Promptly placing all related UN agencies to persuade India for reverting to its original border points
Promptly assisting the victims with their relocation and return to a peaceful life
As Your Excellency should already be well aware of the urgency of the quick action on this issue in the fledgling peace process of Nepal, we do again beseech you to accord the highest possible priority to this new unfortunate development of paramount and far-reaching significance in the context of the United Nations as a protector of national sovereignty, peace, and human rights around the globe.

Thank you very much.
Sincerely yours,

The Nepalese living in New York:

(But UML and Madhav Kumar Nepal and Jhalanath Khanal are still silent on the issue of nationality because they are pakhandi and they want to remain in power despite Indian encroachment and rape and terrorism in Nepal border. Bucause they both know Madan Bhandari is killed by RAW as he didnot compromise sovereignty of Nepal and nepalese.
Madhav Kumar Nepal and Jhalanath Khanal can sell their wives and mother and daughters to Sood if they could remain in the power.
RAW murdered Madan Bhandari and greedy Madhav Nepal and K P Oli and Jhalanath Khanal supplied the information with the help of bidhya Bhandari.
The RAW and terrorists and rapist Indian Man Mohan singh, Menon and Sood can murder any Maoist leader now again like Madan Bhandari as they are against their grand design of Sikkimisation of Nepal.
Akhilesh Upadhayay of kathmandu Post and sudhir Sharma of Kantipur received Rs 20 lak reach for not publishing the border dispute news in their newspaper. These newspapers published the news and Sood denied in the RAW -sponsered newspaper but Sood called them to Lainchour and paid them handsomely and satisfied mother-sellers stopped the news. this is the face of Nepalese journalists.)

Global day against Indian Aggression and new Osama Bin Laden

2009-06-15T13:38:00.001+05:45

Expose the new terrorists and rapist nationally and internationally and add them in the red corner notice to be arrested for raping Nepalese women and encroaching the Nepali land,

This is the letter that nepalese wanted to submit to Indian Embassy in the US but the embassy officials mistreated Nepalese,

Dr. Manamohan Singh
Right Honorable Prime Minister of India
Room No. 148 B South Block
New Delhi 110001, India

June 15, 2009

RE: Border encroachment and human rights violation by Indian security authorities in Nepal

Dear Prime Minister:

As global citizens and citizens and friends of Nepal, we are deeply saddened by the recent actions of the Indian Border Security Forces (IBSF) on Nepali territory. The encroachment on Nepali lands and the atrocities committed against Nepalese citizens is a violation of international law and human rights, and constitutes an attack on Nepal’s sovereignty. With this encroachment our great hope, which is to see India’s foreign policy demonstrate mutual respect and trust, is dashed. The Indian establishment has once again failed to grasp the fact that such folly imposes huge cost to both India and Nepal.

Still, Mr. Prime Minister, you have a choice and you can make the difference.

In May of 2009, the IBSF encroached on Nepali lands and committed atrocities along the border villages of western district of Dang. Two separate delegations of the Constituent Assembly and legislature parliament investigated and reached that conclusion unanimously. These actions resulted in the displacement of more than 6000 people from their homes. Cases of rape and disappearance have also been reported. This is not the first time the IBSF has encroached on Nepali territory and committed atrocities: from Jhapa in the east all the way to Darchula in the west (where the Indian military has even set up a permanent base), the pattern of border encroachment is repeated, with forceful displacement, shifting of border markers and appropriation of territory. India has already appropriated some 59,970 hectares of Nepali territory at 54 points in 21 districts. All these cases are well documented, but India has not shown any sign of taking responsibility of its excesses in a foreign land.

This is not the only example of India’s interference in Nepal’s sovereignty. Recently the Indian Ambassador to Nepal, Mr. Sood, interfered in the choice of Nepal’s Commander-in-Chief. By doing so, he has made it clear that Nepalese right to choose their government remains a right as long as their choice does not contradict with India’s vested interest in Nepal. Mr. Prime Minister, we believe that you understand that the love for motherland and quest for justice does not depend on the size of a country. No matter how small Nepal is compared to India, our love for Nepal and its independence is equal to the love any Indian feels for his motherland.

People from Nepal and India have very cordial relations; they respect and admire each other. They share many common attributes. Our former prime ministers Manmohan Adhikari and B P Koirala were active participants of your national liberation movement. Nepali people in the Indian Army have helped safeguard Indian territory in both the Sino-Indian war and the Indian-Pakistan war. Reciprocally, Indian people have always supported democratic movements in Nepal. The irony is that Indian foreign policy towards Nepal has shown itself over time to be unfair, unjust and vicious.

Nepalese and Friends of Nepal have been hopeful that you, Mr. Prime Minister, would be able to change the “Big Brother” nature of India’s policy in Nepal into one that stands on a firm foundation of mutual respect and trust. These hopes are fading fast. You have the opportunity to make India a great nation by basing India’s foreign policy as it was conceived by former prime minister I. K. Gujral as the Gujral Doctrine. This is time for Indian foreign policymaking be taken out of the hands of bureaucrats still living in the shadow of colonialism.

Change is long overdue. As a first step, we Nepalese, Friends of Nepal and peace loving people around the globe urge you to correct the present aggression immediately, bring the IBSE home to their barracks in India, apologize to those Nepalese who have been the victims of a barbaric act, and compensate those whose property has been destroyed.

Respectfully yours,

The Nepalese residing in the USA

Observe Global day against Indian Aggression on June 15, DECLARE INDIA A TERRORIST COUNTRY

2009-06-14T23:13:00.001+05:45

Why is India lying? Because India is a terrorist country and it is terrorising the Whole south Asia. In every South asian country India is meddeling and playing dirty because its a rapist and Terrorist Country,

Lets write to UN to
DECLARE INDIA A TERRORIST COUNTRY.
DECLARE INDIA A TERRORIST COUNTRY.
DECLARE INDIA A TERRORIST COUNTRY.
DECLARE INDIA A TERRORIST COUNTRY.
DECLARE INDIA A TERRORIST COUNTRY.
DECLARE INDIA A TERRORIST COUNTRY.
DECLARE INDIA A TERRORIST COUNTRY.
DECLARE INDIA A TERRORIST COUNTRY.
DECLARE INDIA A TERRORIST COUNTRY.
DECLARE INDIA A TERRORIST COUNTRY.
DECLARE INDIA A TERRORIST COUNTRY.
DECLARE INDIA A TERRORIST COUNTRY.

Expose Indian Atrocities, expose new Osama Bin Laden aka Man Mohan singh

2009-06-14T21:00:00.000+05:45

India and the pain of Kalapani and Sustas
By Anand Gurung

Just a day after the parliamentary committee on Human Rights and International Relations led by Amik Sherchan and an “all-party” monitoring team concluded that Indian side had indeed encroached upon Nepali land in the bordering areas of Dang district and that locals living there were forced to flee their homes due to continued atrocities on them by the Indian border security force personnel, an interview of the Indian ambassador to Nepal Rakesh Sood appeared in the leading Kantipur Daily on Sunday in which he again dismissed claims (based on media reports) that Nepali land has been encroached upon by India in Dang and that its Border Security Force were involved in appalling atrocities against Nepali citizens living there.
“The surveyors Delhi sent (to Dang) found that there was absolutely no untoward incident,” Ambassador Sood said in the interview with the daily which was originally taken on Friday.
In a persuasive tone of a seasoned diplomat, he assured that when the new border pillars are installed after the “strip maps” signed by Nepal and India in December 2007 is formalized by the Nepal government, “around 98 percent of the border disputes will be resolved”.
“The rest concerning Kalapani and Susta needs to be re-solved at the political level,” he said.
In saying this Ambassador Sood was only repeating what has been officially told on numerous occasions in the past – that long-standing border dispute between Nepal and India has largely been solved except in two areas Kalapani and Susta.
In the rare interview, New Delhi’s representative in Kathmandu who has seen, or if media reports are to be believed, presided over three ‘change of guard’ at Singha Durbar, tried to allay further claims about New-Delhi’s alleged role in bringing down the Maoist-led government and its anxiety over Nepal’s supposed closed ties with China.
And he did this in the classic South Bloc jargon for all seasons, something which his predecessors in Kathmandu used often and which the government and the media here have lapped up without a second thought.
“It is completely an internal affair of Nepal and India had nothing to do with.” --- on New Delhi’s role in toppling Maoist-led government
“Nepal is a sovereign country and it will decide what kind of relationship it will have with any other country.” - on Nepal’s relationship with China.
But the smooth-talking ambassador made a major slip in his attempt to make the border encroachment issue - due to which Nepal-India’s relationship has received a major beating in recent times - a non-issue.
Going by Ambassador Sood’s claim, the disputed areas of Susta and Kalapani are just a small part of the big problem that is already on the way of being resolved and that it needs just a formal acceptance on the part of Nepal to make it a thing of the past, a thorny but forgettable episode in the “age-old, friendly and cordial” ties between the two country.
It is not so.
Various reports backed by credible evidences have shown that India has encroached upon and continues to illegally occupy more than 60,000 hectares of Nepali land at 61different places across the country.
The total area occupied by India in Kalapani and Tinker area of far-western Nepal (an area which has always featured highly during bureaucratic and ministerial level border talks between the two countries) alone is said to stand at 37,000 hectares. Similarly, additional 14,000 hectares of Nepal land has been encroached by India in Susta.
These figures makes it quite clear that Indian occupation of Nepali territory in Kalapani and Susta, which have been erroneously labeled as mere ‘border disputes’ to tone down the seriousness of the situation, in fact lies at the heart of long-standing border problem between the two countries.
This was perhaps why during the Maoist led government few months back, then foreign minister Upendra Yadav and his Indian counterpart Pranab Mukherjee had confined their talks on resolving the dispute particularly in Kalapani and Susta.
Few weeks before the series of reports about encroachment of Nepali land in Dang and atrocities against Nepali citizens living there hogged the media headlines, a field study conducted by the same parliamentary committee had found that an additional 34 hectares of land belonging to people of ward no 6, 7 and 8 of Jhitakaiya VDC in Bara district has been encroached by the Indian side.
The parliamentary committee led by Nepali Congress leader Nabindra Raj Joshi concluded that as many as 264 border pillars were missing out of the original 685. It also found that Indian farmers encroached Nepali land on the backing of Seema Surakcha Bal (SSB) personnel for farming purposes.
Joshi had in an interview with a daily paper at that time said that change in the course of the river also pushed the Nepali land to the Indian side of stream, encouraging Indian farmers to capture it later.
Surprisingly, he refrained from calling this a seizure of Nepali land, instead preferring to just call it a mere ‘border dispute’.
“It is the fact that there is border problem in Bara, but it will not be wise to conclude that the Indian side has encroached Nepali land,” he said. “We may have to go for further study after the technical team hands over its report on this.”
In her tell-all article on encroachment of Nepali territory by the Indian side, P.K Pant, a veteran journalist who regularly writes on border-related issues, sheds some important light on the history of Indian occupation of Kalapani.
She writes: “After India lost to China in the 1962 border war, Indian soldiers gradually receded from the frontline. They learnt a crucial lesson from this war and found the Kalapani area in Nepal as a strategically appropriate and sensitive area because of its potential of acting as a buffer zone between India and China. So, Indian military decided to stay there. (Almost fifty years later) Indian soldier have still been occupying that area, but no voice has been raised against it from any quarters.”
Pant has another interesting revelation that lays bare what she describes as “meekness” of Nepali leaders.
She further writes that in regards to Susta the government deliberately refused to make public the map of the Susta area prepared by the Survey Department in collaboration with the Japanese International Cooperation Agency (JICA)
“The map, prepared in 2003, clearly illustrates the blatant encroachment of some 14,000 hectors of Susta by Indian side,” she writes, and further adds, “Nepal government is surreptitiously trying to suppress the prevalent geographical truths about the area by citing that it failed to confirm the measurement of the encroached land due to the absence of the map.”
She insists that the whole matter is related with foreign-policy conduct.
“We must be determined to clear out differences within ourselves and bring to an end this long-lingering and turbulent issue in the larger interest of the country by reaching to a national consensus,” she implores. “The consensus will thus uphold the dignity of the nation and its people as a whole, and would especially help in dealing with border disputes, water resources, foreign policy and development issues.”
Border experts say that when the time called for it India easily relinquished its traditional “twin pillar theory” (that of democracy and constitutional monarchy) which it held dear when it came to its relation with Nepal, but now it must turn a new leaf in its relation with the Himalayan republic by amicably resolving the long-standing border problem with the new, unwavering pillars of fairness, trust and mutual-respect.
Better fences make better neighbors.

andygurung@yahoo.com

Observe Global day against Indian Aggression on June 15

2009-06-14T11:11:00.000+05:45

Atrocities on Nepal border villagers: Lawmakers
DINESH GAUTAM

DANG, June 13: Locals in villages along the Nepal-India border in Dang district were forced to flee their homes due to continued atrocities on them by the Indian paramilitary force Seema Surksha Bal (SSB), concluded a team of Nepali parliamentarians after completing a four-day field visit to the district.

Speaking at a press meet in Dang on Saturday, the lawmakers however gave contradictory views regarding the encroachment of Nepali land by India. UCPN (Maoist) lawmaker Amik Sherchan said Nepali land was encroached upon but he said he would reveal the extent of encroachment only after looking at the map. Indra Bahadur Tharu, a lawmaker from the same party, said, “On the basis of the map, we did not find any encroachment of Nepali land.” Tharu argued that India plans to encroach the land after chasing away the villagers.

The team of parliamentarians visited the district after around 2,000 people from the villages of Bela, Koilabas and Gobardiha in Dang fled their homes due to alleged encroachment of Nepali land and atrocities committed by the SSB personnel. The displaced villagers are sheltering in the Karri community forest in Satbariya-2 in the district.

All the lawmakers stated that continued atrocities by SSB personnel were the main reason behind the displacement of Nepali villagers in Dang. "There is no state presence in the border villages and the Nepalis are suffering atrocities from the SSB and Indian criminal groups", said Sherchan. He said the SSB crossed into Nepali territory, "dug ditches, set up huts and put up ´signs´ on houses".

But the team found the border pillars intact contrary to what media reports stated. Of the 79 pillars at 22 border points, 78 are intact, said one team member. One pillar was found to have been lost.

According to Sherchan, people have to depend on the Indian market and Nepalis face atrocities as there are no Nepali check posts on the border. "We should ensure a state presence on the border for a solution," he said.

Locals told the team that local women were sometimes raped by SSB personnel, and they allowed people to import just five to 10 kg of food from across the border.

The lawmakers reached the conclusion that the government should take initiatives to return the villagers to their homes and introduce some development packages.

Observe the Day against Indian Aggression on June 15

2009-06-13T18:54:00.001+05:45

The Nepali journalists and politicians are on pay roll of Indian Embassy. They are afraid of the Indians as they think they cannot live without the rapist and terrorist Indian support.
What will Jeewendra Simkhada do if his wife and daughter is raped?
What will Ajay Khanal do if his wife and daughetr is raped
What will Sudhir Sharma do if his wife and daughetr is raped?
What will Akhilesh Upadhayay's do, if his wife and daughetr is raped ?
What will Narayan Wagle do if his wife and daughetr is raped?
What will Peatik Pradhan do if his wife and daughetr is raped?
What will Girija Prasad do if his wife and daughetr is raped?
What will Madhav Nepal do if his wife and daughetr is raped?
What will K P Oli do if his wife and daughetr is raped?
What will jhalanath Khanal do if his wife and daughetr is raped?
What will Ramchandra Poudel do if his wife and daughetr is raped?
What will Sherbahadur Deuba do if his wife and daughetr is raped?
What will Sujata Koirala do if his daughetr is raped?

Close down the RAW-sponsored Himalayan times and Annapurna Post and arrest their journalists for writing against national interest and Nepal. How can a government tolerate such anti-nepal activities in Nepal. If Madhav Nepal is a true nepali he has to take action against these RAW-agents and immediately arrest them and issue White paper on national issue.

It is a established fact that India is a terrorist country in South Asia. The Indian Army, SSB, police and every indians are rapist and terrorists and they areterrorising Nepal, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Pakistan, Sri Lanka and whole South Asia.
Lets observe the Day Against Indian Aggression on June 15 world and protest terrorist Indians.

This is the proof.

Delegations say India encroached Nepal's land

The separate delegations of the Constituent Assembly and legislature parliament have concluded that Nepali has been encroached by India in Dang district.

The CA team was lead by Amik Sherchan, chairman of the Committee for Protection of National Interest while the parliamentary delegation was headed by Padma Lal Biswakarma, chairman of the International Relations and Human Rights Committee.

Organising a press conference in Dang Saturday, the all-party CA inspection team urged the government to start rehabilitation of those displaced due to unruly acts of the Indian border security officials, provide them relief support and seek lasting solution to the recurrent border disputes.

The team told local journalists that Indian SSB personnel threatened, harassed and barred Nepalis from purchasing daily consumer goods from the bordering market.

Indian government and some Nepali officials including Foreign Minister Sujata Koirala had denied any border encroachment. The RAW-sponsered papers have said that Indian did not encroach the Nepali Land.

What will Rakesh Sood do, if his wife and daughter is raped? Send this rapist terrorist Indian back.

Indian newspaper's another propaganda

2009-06-10T13:31:00.000+05:45

When Nepalese were beingf raped and chased in Nepal Himalayan Times was busy publishing Indian Embassy press release denying the fact of our Nepalese women being raped and chased and kidnapped but when the bloody rapist and terrorist Indian are in Nepal they are the main news in the RAW-propangada newspaper Himalayan times.
We have been maintaining that Foreign investment in newspaper is wrong aand it will weaken the nationality and its the proof. This indian journalist and his Nepali counterparts in Himalayan Times and Apca should learn how Indian newspapers lobbied for teh Indian student when they are beaten in Australia.
Shame on Nepalese journalists, they have no blood but teh water running in their vein how can they bremain silent when their daughters and mothers are being raped and kidnapped and chased,

This Indian journalist who wrote this story should be kicked out of Nepal and his wife and mother should be raped.
Close the RAW-sponsered Himalayan Times and annapurna Post .
Close Apca house and ban the editors from working in any newspapers in nepal, They are mother sellers and traitors.
Rape the bloody indian Rajan Pokhrel's wife and daughters !

Pilgrims’ progress halted
Rajan Pokhrel
KATHMANDU: Hundreds of Indian pilgrims who were headed for Kailash Mansarovar via Nepal have been stranded in Taklakot-Purang and Tatopani area of Tibet due to obstruction along the Araniko Highway for the last three days.
Air passengers too have not been able to return from Kailash area as locals have halted air services in Simikot, Humla, for the last three days demanding revision in fares. According to immigration officials, six pilgrims have died of altitude sickness since the first week of May.
Most of the pilgrims were above the age of 50.
Vijaya Poudel, chief of the Immigration Department, Tatopani border, said four bodies of Indian pilgrims had been identified.
The deceased are Sarala Devi of Ghantasala, Srikanta and Umakant of Doddaballapur and Tusar Murti of Kanpur. Meanwhile, District Police office (DPO) Humla informed that two pilgrims who died in the Kailash area were airlifted to Simikot last week.
One of the deceased had been identified as Damodar Das Agrawal of Benares.
Both the bodies were flown to India from Simikot, the DPO added.
Tenzing Norbu Lama of Sunny Travels said the locals today allowed Yeti Airlines to operate two flights for rescue operation from Humla airport.
“Stranded pilgrims will be rescued at the earliest,” Lama said.
He also appealed to the authorities to ensure pilgrims’ safe return.

Why India is shielding Nepal Army Chief Katawal?

2009-06-08T12:59:00.001+05:45

If the Maoists’ Prime Minister Pushpa Kamal Dahal still thinks that he can take a rest for over six hours, somewhere in the outskirts of Kathmandu, leaving the country in doldrums, and that too after meeting the Indian envoy and one of the declared Indian agents, then he is mistaken.

Prime Minister Pushpa Kamal Dahal was accompanied by the families of some Maoists Peoples’ Liberation Army Commanders and his family members obviously, beloved wife Sita, heir apparent Prakash, daughter-in-law Srijana and nephew Sameer. That PM Dahal was more a family man than the country man is not also a secret either.

The rebel leader who was forcefully sent to the mainstream Nepali politics by the Indian regime which later followed by his election as the Prime Minister of the country, say experts, is bound to pay for this Indian magnanimity exhibited then.

That he is paying the dues become evident when a legitimate Government Head finds himself unable to sack the Nepal Army Chief.

After all, why the Indian regime is shielding Katwal is a Himalayan mystery? But the mystery remains no longer a secret affair for the intelligent brains and nationalists. There is no free lunch in Indian diplomacy!

PM Dahal headed straight 30 kilometers north-east of the capital, avoiding the May Day celebrations, May 1, 2009, and arrived at a resort in Lapsi-phedi VDC. However, Dahal’s destination was kept a guarded secret, say police sources.

The Kantipur daily writes quoting the Home Minister Bam Dev Gautam, the May Day is generally taken as a day of relief, thus he may have gone there to take a rest.

It was around seven in the morning, Amresh Kumar Singh the former Nepali Congress parliamentarian whose being a Nepali national remains suspect, had come uninvited to seek an audience with the Prime Minister.

What transpired in between the two, though still a mystery, but a quick guess makes it clear that the man who was chosen by the Indian establishment to act as a mediator between the then rebels and the seven party alliances to sign the 12-Points Agreement, holds lot of water in Nepali politics still.

PM Dahal was about to take on the SUV ride to an undisclosed location, there appeared the busiest man in Nepali politics, Rakesh Sood, the man who is officially known as the Indian Ambassador to Nepal whose scope and sphere of influence in Nepali politics is boundless.

PM Dahal took him to his private chamber and the two returned after ten minutes.

“The abrupt decision to stay away from May Day Celebrations was taken immediately after the Indian Ambassador to Nepal, Rakesh Sood met with the Prime Minister early morning”, adds sources.

After meeting Sood, PM Dahal talked to the Finance Minister Dr. Babu Ram Bhattarai and asked him to address the May Day gathering in Public theatre in Kathmandu, to which Dr. Bhattarai readily accepted.

PM Dahal also told Bhattarai that the Indian envoy was still pressurizing him to retain Katawal or else, says Sood “await catastrophic situation in the country”.

The moot question thus again is: why Indian establishment is shielding Katawal?

What gains after all India will have upon retaining Katawal?

Or is it that Katwal has some “soft” inclination towards the Indian regime?

Questions galore!

It proves India wants to bring chaoes in Nepal. The appointment of Sujata as foreign minister and Madhav Kumar Nepal as Prime Minister is the proof of Indian grand design to destabilize Nepal and send Indian Army to capture nepal. The Dang incident is the water testing by the Indian because after the protest the RAW sponsered newspaper in the Kathmandu The Himalayan Times and annapurna Post published news saying the border encroachment issue is baseless citing the Indian embasssy in RAW's order.
But the Indian embassy issued the pres release the next day. The Indian embassy and RAw are competing to prove they are smnartly acting in teh case of Nepal.
In the editorial meeting of these newspapers one Indian embassy staff is always present and he reports to embassy.
Similarly, the RAW has recently sent its trusted man Dhruba as a journalist to Kathmandu who is seen hanging around Apca house nowdays.

Bastard Sood and Indians ill intentions their puppet journalists and newspapers

2009-06-05T12:45:00.001+05:45

We have always said that the RAW funded newspapers in Nepal are not doing journalism but they are here to spy and misinform and mislead the Nepalese and the whole world.
The newspapers run by RAW Himalayan Times and Annapurna Post today published the distorted story. The Nepalese are raped and chased and the bastards in the Indian embassy and Himalayan Times and Annapurna Post donot see the rape. Their wives and mothers and daughters should be raped to make them understand what is rape and what is the pain of displased and chased by the police.
The Indians are terrorists and criminals. It is the proof and they have learned to rape and torture people as they were alo raped by expansionists once.
The bastard Indians are trying to misinform the people through their newspaper and its dangerous for the nationality.
Shut down Himalayan Times and Annapurna Post and ban the bastard Indians to enter Nepal.
The bastard Indian called Rakesh Sood and his countrymen shoud learn to respect Nepalese as Nepalese are not bastards like Sood and all the Indians.
The editors of these two newspapers should be shot dead in treson as they are writing against the country and their countrymen. Are these editors journalists or RAW agents and bastards like the Indians, they should be arrested and filed case against them.

The proof of Indian bastards and their height of bastardism,

KATHMANDU: A source in Indian Embassy on thursday said that the ongoing controversy on the Indo-Nepal border was baseless and fabricated.
The source maintained that the motive behind the row was to vitiate the friendly ties
between the two neighbouring countries. “We have taken up this issue with the government of Nepal. It was raised only by a section of the Nepali media and certain political organisations with vested interests. So far, no complaint has been lodged,” added the source.
There is a proper platform to hold periodic border management talks between India and Nepal. However, New Delhi has been eager to hold meeting with Kathmandu for long.
“But, Nepal has not been forthcoming on this. The only solution is to put a signature on the boundary maps by both sides. This is what India wants,” said the source.
“We request the government of Nepal to look how this frivolous and fictitious news item gained currency. It should deliberate upon this serious issue since it intends to harm the bilateral relationship,” added the source.
During an all-party meeting that was held in Dang yesterday, Roshan Pun, coordinator, Locals’ Struggle Committee, maintained that border villagers were never displaced from their native place.
But, they had launched an agitation to put pressure on the government to redress their long-standing grievances. They also agreed to return to their homes in seven days after the district administration assured them of addressing their woes at the earliest.

Is this journalism? -- Its a national shame and yellow journalism

2009-06-04T13:06:00.000+05:45

Is this journalism?
The RAW propaganda machine and its dalal journalists are twisting the fact and misreporting on national issue. Ban the RAw propaganda machine and close it.
If there is any Nepali editor in Himalayan times he should resign and expose the Indian RAW grand design or surrender to the Indians and sell his mother, wife and daughters for money.

It proves that this is RAW propaganda machine and Indian are using Nepalese journalists like toilett papers, who is the editor of this yellow journalism? shame on him and the journalists of this country.

Border villagers agree to return home
Last Updated : 2009-06-04 12:01 AM

The Himalayan Times - Saved Articles(s)

DANG: Villagers living on the Nepal-India border areas on Wednesday agreed to return to their homes within the next seven days following assurances from the district administration to redress their grievances at the earliest.
Around 1,000 villagers have been living in the Karri community forest area for the past three days.
The Karri Community Forest Consumers’ Group members also called off their indefinite strike along the East-West Highway. The stir was slated to begin from tomorrow to protest the encroachment of forest land by locals.
An all-party meeting, held at the DAO, reached this agreement. Representatives from the displaced, Karri Community Forest Consumers’ Group, parties and mediapersons took part in the meeting. Dang CDO Rishi Ram Dhakal said that the following demands — ensuring safety and security of the border residents, providing daily basic needs and civic amenities — were conceded. Contrary to the popular perception, the aggrieved people claimed that they were never displaced in the first place. They wanted to exert pressure on the government for their safety and development work in the area.

Displaced number 2000, run out of food; Nepali land 'encroached'

2009-06-03T19:26:00.000+05:45

RUDRA KHADKA

SATBARIYA, Dang, June 3: Some 2000 Nepalis from villages on Nepal-India border who have been displaced due to alleged harassment by Indian border security forces are running out of the meager food stuff they brought with them.

These people from the bordering Rajpur, Koilabas, Bela and Gobardiha villages have been staying in the Kari community forest adjoining the East-West Highway in Dang district.

The number of displaced due to harassment by India´s border security force -- Sashastra Surakshya Bal (SSB) -- is increasing. Even on Tuesday, some 250 came to Satbariya. Many are still on the highway not knowing where to go.

Karma Roka, 28, of Kalyankoti in Rajpur has a supply of just half a kilogram of rice. Karma, who has two daughters, left her village on May 28 after threats from the Indian security personnel. She had 5 kg of rice then.

"I don´t know what will happen once the remaining rice is consumed," Karma told Republica. Her husband has gone to India in search of job.

These villagers have accused SSB of harassing them, especially the women. Reports surface from time to time about SSB´s "high-handedness" and notorious behavior against Nepal citizens. But neither Nepal government nor its Indian counterpart have been able to restrain the SSB.

"The Indian side harassed us because we are Nepalis and the Nepal government never bothered about us," said another displaced Deviram BK. "Either the government should ensure security in our villages or help settle us at a secure place."

Of the 22 transit points on the international border, just Koilabas and Khangi have police posts. Robbers and goons from India often raid these four villages, the displaced allege but rue that there is no protection from the district administration.

Some people get "displaced" from their villages in the hope of getting land from the government, officials of Kari community forest that occupies an area of 47o hectares, said. They also said that some of the "displaced" have started "capturing" community and private forest areas.

Indian encroachment on Nepali territory alleged

Some of the displaced also accuse the India forces of encroaching on Nepali territory, another charge that comes up frequently. While the Nepali government officials maintain a conspicuous silence, the Indian officials deny it.

Nepalis in these bordering villages have accused the SSB of shifting the border demarcation pillars toward Nepali territories.

Spokesperson of Unified Communist Party of Nepal (Maoist) Dinanath Sharma issued a press release in Kathmandu on Tuesday, condemning the "encroachment". The party has termed it an encroachment on Nepal´s sovereignty.

The press release said that India´s SSB has burnt houses, beat people, raped women in villages in Koilabas, Patauli, Siriya, Sukauli, Gurung and Bhaisahi in Dang and Jhitkaiya, Badki, Fubariya, and Basantpur in Bara district.

"Dispute about Susta, Maheshpur, Kalapani and Limpiyadhura has long prevailed," Sharma said. India´s neighboring, small and weak nations have been suffering due to its traditional, feudalistic, bullying and expansionist policy."

Meanwhile, the Ministry of Home Affairs in Kathmandu has instructed the Dang administration to conduct a field study of the displaced and report to it. It has also asked the Department of Survey to look into the complaints of shifting of border pillars.

About Nepali journalists and journalism

2009-06-03T13:16:00.000+05:45

Nepali newspapers and journalists didnot publish the news of mass chasing of Nepalese by Indian security forces. Why?
They are paid by Indianj embassy.
They work for RAW.
They are not the son of their fathers.

Similarly, the political parties didinot raise any voice against the Indian encroachment. why?
because they can sell their mothers for few IC notes.
They are operated by Indian embassy and most of them are on payroll of RAW.
They are not the real sons of their fathers?

Let our politicians and journalists go back home and ask their mother who are their fathers?
Shame on you, Girija Madhav Nepal, and K P Oli, who doesnot want this countirs as KP has no children, Madhav's son studied on indian scholarship and will work in Indian for IC and Girija's daughetr is a bitch.
But the millions of children of Nepales wil not tolerate the Indian expansionist and raise against the Indias down with India and Indans.

End encroachment, Maoists ask India
KATHMANDU, June 3 - The Unified CPN (Maoist) on Tuesday demanded that the Indian government end encroachment of Nepali land on the border and immediate return of seized land to create an environment of peace and to maintain security situation along the border.
The Maoists also appealed to the Constituent Assembly to take up the issue of peace and security on the border, return of seized land and end to encroachment.
Maoist Spokesman Dinanath Sharma stated in a press release that there were reports of encroachment by Indian Seema Surakshya Bal in Patauli, Koilabas, Siriya, Sukouli, Gurung, Bhousahi on the border with Dang; and instances of rape and torching of houses in 20 other places such as Jhitkaiya, Badki, Fubriya,and Basantapur had caused people to flee their homes.
"India has time and again encroached Nepal's land, forcing locals to flee from their homes which is an open challenge to Nepal's national territorial integrity," said Sharma in a statement.
The press statement said that even International Relations and Human Rights Committee of the Parliament, had in its report stated that border pillars of that area too had gone missing and the land has been encroached. Sharma said the present government cannot provide security to Nepalis and protect the country. "So all nationalist citizens should unite against direct encroachment from India."

Thousands displaced as Indian forces drive Nepali families out of their villages

2009-06-03T11:03:00.001+05:45

When Sood is meeting Girija Prasafd Koirala, his security forces are chasing Nepalese within Nepal.
What did Koirala said Sood? Bhai Saab Meri Beti ko minister Banadijiye sab Nepal le lijiye.
Down with Girija, Down with sood, Down with Indian expansionists.
Chase all the Indians and Indian companies from Nepal. All Indians are Matherchod.

The Indian border security force, Seema Surakshya Bal (SSB), has driven out hundreds of Nepali families living along Nepal-India border in west Nepal.
More than 6,000 have been displaced as SSB personnel drove Nepali families out from various bordering villages of Dang district along Nepal-India border.
Of them, 1,800 have taken refuge at the Satbariya community forest of Deukhuri, Dang after SSB encroached Nepali land and torched their homes, Kantipur daily reported.
"They torched our houses saying you can’t live here," Purna Kumari Bista, 70, of Rajpur, Dang told the daily. "We had to leave with the family to protect our lives."
She also claimed the SSB shifted border pillars some 35 metres inside Nepali land.
Villagers from some 22 entry points bordering Dang district on the Nepali side and Balarampur, Shravasti and Gonda districts on the Indian side have fled their homes.
The displaced said the SSB assaulted and raped women. "We are forced to become mute spectators when they rape our ladies," said Begaram Pun of Siriya. "More than 15 girls have already gone missing."
Even though the villagers had been facing atrocities since years, they were forced to flee when the atrocities became intolerable, the report says.
They were forced to flee after the SSB did not allow them to buy essentials in the Indian market and took away theirs, according to Cham Kumari Gharti of Khangra.
"They (used to) come to our houses brandishing guns and take away our ration and live stocks," said Gharti. "They beat us up if we tried to oppose. Probably there is nobody that has not been beaten up at least once."
The displaced have been living in make-shift tents at Karri community forest in Satbariaya.
Chief District Officer of Dang Rishi Ram Dhakal said an all-party meeting would be called soon to resolve the issue.

Indian spits venom against Nepal, China

2009-06-01T19:11:00.000+05:45

One Indian spit venom againts Nepal and China and tried to play big brother indian. But he should understand clearly that Nepalese know that India is the biggest threat to Nepal's integrety and sovereignty and development. down with Indian expansionist.

Read the RAW propagande and Indian shit.

"If there is any threat to Nepal it is from China" - Indresh Kumar

The Maoist government took 26 important decisions during its nine-month rule and 21 of them were controversial. By and large, it was a failed government. The Maoists’ topmost agenda was to accommodate their armed cadres in Nepal army and other security forces, which was unacceptable to the nationalist citizens and the political parties there.

RSS National Executive Member and senior Pracharak Shri Indresh Kumar keeps a close watch on the developments in the whole Himalayan region. He is the inspiration behind many organisations working for the protection and development of the culture of the Himalayan region. Organiser representative Pramod Kumar spoke to him in New Delhi on recent developments taking place in Nepal. Excerpts:

How do you look at the recent political developments in Nepal?
Sometime back the election to the Constituent Assembly was held there. The objective of constituting the Constituent Assembly was not only to frame a new constitution for the new democratic republic but also to run the administration. It was not a stable or permanent government. Though, the Maoists emerged as the largest group after the election, they did not get the mandate for forming the government, as the seats they won were hardly 35 per cent of the total seats (238 out of 601). Despite the fact that the non-Maoists parties could have formed a government at that time too, they came to the conclusion that since the Maoists too struggled for democracy, they should not be denied a chance of sharing the power. Finally, a government under the leadership of Maoist leader Shri Prachanda with outside support from some smaller parties assumed the power.

The Maoist government took 26 important decisions during its nine-month rule and 21 of them were controversial. By and large, it was a failed government. The Maoists’ topmost agenda was to accommodate their armed cadres in Nepal army and other security forces, which was unacceptable to the nationalist citizens, top army officials and the political parties there. The people thought that since the activities of Maoists have been illegal, unconstitutional and undemocratic, they, if accommodated in the army, would not obey the chief of the army and would continue to follow the instructions of their political bosses. But to materialise their agenda, the Maoists adopted all kinds of unfair means including to pressurise the Nepal army chief Gen. Rookmangud Katawal. They also went to the court but did not get any relief from there. Finally, Prime Minister Prachanda, without even consulting the President and other coalition partners, tried to sack the Army chief, which was not allowed by the President Shri Ram Baran Yadav. Meanwhile, a statement came from the Maoist leader Baburam Bhattarai claiming that they would dethrone the President too as they dethroned the King. It angered the Nepali people. A CD also surfaced in the media exposing the blueprint prepared by the Maoists about one and a half years back to capture the power of Nepal and also to accommodate their cadres in the army. That CD has not been disowned by the Maoists till date. This CD basically exposed the hidden agenda of the Maoists in the guise of participating in democratic process.

Now a national government under the leadership of Shri Madhav Nepal, involving 22 of the total 24 parties representing in the House, has been formed there. More than 356 members in the House of 601 have extended support to Shri Nepal. We congratulate Shri Madhav and his entire team on this occasion.

But the Maoists have taken to the streets opposing the new government.
They will naturally oppose as they have been dethroned. We should not forget that Shri Prachanda was till recently an interim Prime Minister and Speaker of the Constituent Assembly was also a Maoist. They did not want any democratic government to assume power in Nepal. They staged dharnas and organised demonstrations against this democratic process. It is wrong. The Maoists should support the democratic process in the country. Since their dictatorrial and fascist face has been exposed they created all kinds of problems in the formation of the new government.

The new national government wants to have cordial relations with neighbouring countries. They want to have better relations with India where lakhs of Nepalese live and the country also shares open border with it. But the Maoists and certain other agencies like ISI of Pakistan, China etc. do not want these relations to be cordial. These forces have been hatching conspiracies to establish their control over the whole Himalayan region, which appears to be collapsing.

What should be the role of India in this situation?
India and all other democratic forces of the world should extend full support to the new democratic government of Nepal so that Nepal could be built as a literate, developed, happy, powerful and prosperous nation.

What do you say over the removal of South Indian pujaris from the Pashupatinath temple by the Maoist regime?
This is not a good development. Let us see what steps the new government takes in this regard. Basically, that was not a right but a tradition developed centuries ago to unite the people from Indian Ocean to the Himalayan region. The pilgrimages to Dhakeshwari, Katasraj, Nankana Saheb, Jhulelal, Hinglas, etc., are still conducted to promote peace and brotherhood in the region. It is not dominance by India anwhere. The step taken by the Maoists government was wrong.

What do you expect from the new government of Nepal?
We expect the democratic values are restored, Sanatan pravah is strengthened, the downtrodden get justice and there should be no division in the society in the name of ways of worship, castes, etc. The Government of India should extend a helping hand to Nepal in its progress. I hope, Nepal, under the new government following democratic values and maintaining its ancient cultural pravah, will emerge as a powerful, happy and prosperous country where the people work unitedly for their all-round progress.

But certain forces in Nepal term any advice or help from India an interference in the internal affairs of the country. How do you look at it?
It is a sponsored propaganda on the part of the anti-India and anti-Nepal forces. It is propagated by the forces including ISI and China to widen the gap between both the countries so that they can establish their control over Nepal. It is a known fact that ISI wants to create a corridor from Pakistan to Bangladesh via Nepal. During the last 60 years, India has extended all possible help to Nepal. Therefore, this propaganda must be eliminated. Nepal and India may be two countries but they are one by soul and culture. Nepal does not have any threat from its southern side. If there is any threat it is from the north as China has already grabbed Tibet and Kailash Mansarovar and still has its eyes on Laddakh and Arunachal Pradesh of Bharat. We must be alert against all these threats.

The cat is out of Bag

2009-05-21T12:30:00.000+05:45

Rishi Dhamala the RAW agent who supplies all the informations to the Indian embassy as we have always been saying writes for another RAW propaganda machine as who have been saying.
And its no surprise for us as we have been constantly watching the movements of the Mr Dhamala, who is most of the time in APCA house and reports to Indian embassy.
Like it is said the cat is out of the bag, Mr Dhamala and the RAW propaganda machine and their propaganda against Nepal is once more exposed.
Shut down the RAW propaganda machine and punish Mr Dhamala and his accomplises otherwise they will be finished like Lamil Tigers of Sri Lanka. Lamil Tigers was also RAW creation to create instability in Sri Lanka. Hail Sri Lanka for its war against all such anti-national elements. Nepal government also should crush all those who are creating disturbances and instability in Nepal in the name of one Madhesh one Pradesh.

The unfortunate politics of convenience Can’t dignified method replace it?

Rishi Dhamala
(the Jocker who cannot even write in Nepali writes in English. Not surprising as it might be written by RAW agent from Indian embassy and published in teh name of Mr Dhamala in their own propaganda machine. Down with RAW, down with Indian imperialism and expansionism)

Nepal has attracted world attention following the downfall of the Maoist led government. There is a hurried bid to give it a political color. There are some political parties and people who say that it is because of Indian interference. But is it an indicator of interests in Nepal or interference? There has to be debate and understanding of the issue rather than pass judgement on your own.
The world community is time and again referring to the need to come up with timely drafting of the constitution before the peace process is taken to its logical conclusion and the nation embarks on rapid economic growth path. With this as backdrop, it would be misleading to allege the Indian side of interference.
The world community has always been a well wisher in the democratization movement of Nepal. They have been helping the cause of Nepalese democratization process while also backing unity among political parties by stressing on reconciliation. Advice and suggestions from foreign friends come in useful in such circumstances. They cannot be called interferences. The nation is currently on the verge of crafting a new government. This is leading to talks between parties at various levels.
The main issue is about sustainable peace. What will happen if the nation does not produce a constitution on time? This is one question bothering foreign friends as well.
The international attention towards Nepal has shot up following the ouster of the Prachanda-led government and the video expose. The attention is understandable since foreign friends play an important role in the Nepalese peace process and economic development. The concern shown by them in this connection should not be deemed as unnatural.
The international attention is also understandable given the way the UCPN-Maoist leadership has not implemented the commitment demonstrated vis-a-vis the peace process following the ten-year long insurgency before going on to lead the government.
While the Maoists can by all means misleadingly bill the foreign interest as naked interference but that is far from the truth. What is true is the Maoists too have attracted foreign support and cooperation. In fact, UCPN-Maoist is the leading party which is getting such support from India. None other than the Maoist leader Prachanda himself has conceded that he had spent many years in India during the insurgency even as it is also true that the 12-point deal was signed in India.
One cannot also under-estimate the role played by India in the conduct of elections to the Constituent Assembly. Yes, there may be certain issues which have failed to bring about convergence of views between Nepal and India. But there are certain procedures and norms which can lead to their resolution.
Historically speaking, India has always extended cooperation and sympathy to Nepalese democratic forces and their campaigns. But, instead of reciprocal cooperation, sympathy and liberal attitude India is being looked on with suspicion, which cannot be justified on any ground. This is pathetic. No nation can race ahead with blind nationalism as the credo.
One cannot deny the Indian role in the democratization of Nepal. The records are there for anyone to delve into and get at the reality. So much so that the Indian assistance had come forth while the Maoists were leading the government. Maoists were not enjoying majority in the constituent assembly; it was just the single largest party.
The Indian side had lobbied for the Maoist led government. Much of what is involved becomes evident from the way Prime Minister Prachanda had invited special Indian envoy to Nepal. This is reflected in his subsequent interview.
Meanwhile, what cannot be accepted as political character is the act of flaying something when it is not favorable and appreciating something when the same is in favor. Prachanda undertook two visits to India while still in office. He went on to say that Indian Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and BJP leader Lal Krishna Advani were his guardians. But he spat venom at the Indian leaders while resigning out of office. The point here is he should have dealt with the Indian side in the diplomatic front by striking a desired deal. It does not behove of him to decry the Indian side in the open streets.
Prachanda is still the stand in prime minister. But, he is going on speaking against India forgetting the basic diplomatic norms. His failure meanwhile lies in the fact that he could not take into confidence the diplomatic mechanism existing in the South Block. He cannot compensate his setback even if he tries hard now. One does not simply need to burn the effigy of any ambassador to uphold the national interest while also boosting national pride. It is but a cheap form of protesting the moves of a diplomat.
The writer does not have any intention to boost the Indian cause. If we are to institutionalize our new born republican system we will have to strike excellent relationships with India, China, the US and the EU. Diplomatic norms do not approve of politics of convenience whereby one can flay and hail in the same breathe.

Maoist kicked India on ass,, Sood is called back

2009-05-10T14:02:00.000+05:45

The Indian hegemony continues and continues its dictatorship in South Asia. Is India a democratic country ? No, how can it back military coup in Nepal and dictator Jigme in Bhutan and army in Burma? Indian foreign policy is directed by expansionist dogma and hangover of British slavery.
Rakesh Sood is called back because he failed. Here is one more shocking revealation from Indian columnist Sidharth Bhatia on why all the neighbors hate Indian hegemony, the RAW and its grand design in Nepal, Sri Lanka, Pakistan and Bangladesh and Bhutan.

Why do our neighbours hate us so much?
Sidharth Bhatia

A few years ago, on a visit to Kathmandu I was gently advised by an Indian friend living in the country for some time on some do's and don'ts. "The Nepalis are very sensitive about the way Indians behave with them. The best suggestion I can give you is to be polite at all times and not ever speak to anyone, including shopkeepers, waiters and the like in Hindi but English."
I could understand the first part -- Indians can get boorish while abroad and they may not even consider Nepal as a foreign country but as their own backyard. But why the language restriction? The answer came: "When you speak in Hindi, it appears you are treating them as someone lesser than you, as servants. That is the only reason you would assume they should know Hindi. By speaking in English you treat them as equals."
On another occasion, during a trip to Colombo, I found the locals polite as only Sri Lankans can be. But only as far as cabbies and shopkeepers were concerned. The Sri Lankan elite have nothing but resentment and contempt for their bigger neighbour. My first visit was some years after the Indian Peacekeeping Force (IPKF) had packed its bags and come back home. A retired Sri Lankan diplomat, who had served in New Delhi, regaled me with stories of India's imperialist behaviour. "Nehru wanted to annex Sri Lanka; it is part of the Akhand Bharat (larger India) design. Your high commissioners behave like viceroys and now you send your army here too. What else can this mean?" No amount of pointing out that Nehru was never a believer in Akhand Bharat and the IPKF landed in Sri Lanka on the express invitation of the then president Jayawardene convinced him. He and many of his compatriots felt India would gobble up their country one day and in any case ordered it around a bit too much.
Sri Lanka is a friendly country -- so you can imagine what they think of us in Pakistan, where the elite has always resented India and the common folk are fed a steady diet of anti-Indian propaganda through their school textbooks and state-run media. The word hegemony comes up constantly in conversation with even those who belong to the intelligentsia.
What causes this bitterness? What is about India that arouses so much hostility among its neighbours?
Some part is easy to understand. India is bigger than all of them put together. Its population and its economy tower over the others, even if its social indicators are far behind. Sri Lanka's literacy levels are ahead of India while Pakistan has managed things like primary health much better. But it is India which has been on a scorching growth path and is attracting global attention in everything from software development to Bollywood to its stock market. Not that India is without its problems -- there is internal strife in Kashmir, the north-east and in large parts of the hinterland. But a country of its size can absorb these shocks much better than a smaller one. Sri Lanka is in the news for its civil war, Nepal for rampant instability and poverty and as for Pakistan, to be known as the epicentre of global terrorism cannot be very edifying. So envy definitely plays a role in the perception of the neighbours.
But some blame must also fall on us. While the others accuse us of behaving like an imperial country, the truth is we cannot make up our mind what or who we are. A proper imperial country would be under no confusion about its role. India sometimes flexes muscle, on other occasions wants to give pyar ki jhappi (the Gujral doctrine) and aid and ends up sending out mixed signals. Our policy in Nepal is confused -- are we monarchists or pro-democracy? The Maoists are in the government, whether you like it or not. There is little doubt that their behaviour leaves a lot to be desired. But when they show pro-Chinese leanings and want to re-look at the long-standing Indo-Nepal treaty, we don't talk to them, we fly into high dudgeon. Then our nostalgia for the old days returns. Instead of talking to them, we start flirting with the former king, or give that impression. A truly imperialist power would read out the riot act; we play footsie -- Rajiv Gandhi had ordered an off-the-record blockade of the border and immediately got the Nepalis to see the advantages of being friends with India.
In Sri Lanka, the irresponsible attitude of Tamil Nadu politicians is guiding our moves. The timorousness of VP Singh, when he recalled the IPKF has remained to this day -- so sending any kind of military assistance to the Sri Lankan government is a taboo subject. But it ends up looking as if we are pro-Prabhakaran, who should be enemy number 1. Not surprisingly while we lay off, the Chinese move into Sri Lanka, right at our doorstep.
Being big and powerful also means being responsible. But a country must be guided by enlightened self-interest and command respect and some fear too. If Sri Lanka and Nepal say they will not let any foreign country interfere in their affairs, they have a perfect right to do so. India too must make it clear that Chinese fishing in the neighbourhood goes against our best interests. We want to be friends with everyone in the region, but not at any cost. The Nepali, Sri Lankan, Pakistani or Bangladeshi is not likely to start loving you for it, but will start respecting you for it.

EXPOSE INDIA: India has always interfered in Nepal

2009-05-07T17:20:00.001+05:45

Barsha Man Pun 'Ananta', a former Deputy Commander of the Maoist People's Liberation Army (PLA), is known to be a close confidant of Prime Minister Pushpa Kamal Dahal. On Friday evening, two days before the Maoists decided to remove Chief of Army Staff (CoAS) Rookmangud Katawal from office, Ananta spoke to Akhilesh Upadhyay and Aditya Adhikari about the Army Chief controversy. Contrary to Maoist actions since Friday, Ananta claimed there was no option but to gain consensus from the other political parties before removing the Army Chief from his position.

Q: What could be the solution for the current controversy regarding the removal of Chief of Army Staff (CoAS) Rookmangud Katawal?

Ananta: From a constitutional and legal point of view, the solution is easy. The government is allowed to ask for clarification, promotions and transfers of officials of the organs under its control. But because the issue regarding the Army Chief has become a controversial national issue, the only option is to form a minimum consensus with other parties in the government and in the opposition and then take action against the Army chief.

Q: What are the chief reasons that your party wishes to remove the CoAS?

Ananta: We've been saying this publicly. There are three major incidents and a number of other smaller ones, where the CoAS has disobeyed the government and gone against the principles of civilian supremacy and democratic control. The government then felt that the CoAS was displaying insubordination and asked him for clarification on his position, in which he implies that the Army does not fall under the control of the government. He says that the president is responsible for appointing him and only the president can remove him. Indirectly, he has also claimed that the government doesn't have the right to ask for clarification. This has further convinced the Maoist party of the Army chief's insubordination and it therefore decided to take action against him.

The other claims that have been made in public - that the Maoists want to consolidate their control over the Army, that they want to establish a one-party state, that they want to integrate the entire Maoist army into the national one -- these are only false rumours.

Q: If the clarification had been more conciliatory, would you have desisted from attempting to take action against him?

Ananta: Yes. There was a situation where the United Nations Mission in Nepal (UNMIN) was saying that the Army was violating its peace accord obligations. Civil society was saying the same thing. In this context, there was no option but to ask the Army chief for a clarification. We had thought that the clarification would be “soft” and that we would easily be able to find a resolution acceptable to all. But the clarification displayed such deep insubordination, and the Army chief, instead of trying to resolve the issue with the government, went to get the help of various political parties and diplomatic missions. This we felt was the incorrect thing to do.

Q: There were only a few months left before the Army chief's retirement. Why did you decide to take action against him and bring so many problems upon yourself, when it was only a few months before an easy solution could have been found?

Ananta: The row with the Army had reached a climax a few months ago during the controversy over recruitment. But the government displayed patience at that time. There were demands in the party that a clarification should be demanded of the CoAS and that action should be taken against him, but the prime minister managed to calm these voices down. He called a meeting of the five parties and said, “Recruitment has already taken place. Let's take a political decision regarding this and accept it.” The court took the same decision later. But the court also implied that the decision to recruit was wrong as it told the Army not to do so again.

So the government initially tried to reconcile differences with the Army. But these differences increased as the Army continued to disobey the government. We were forced to think of what tradition such moves by the Army would set. They have disobeyed the government on recruitment, then on the renewal of tenure of generals, then on the issue of the National Games. If this continues to be accepted by the government, the next Army Chief may also continue this tradition, and the power of the government over the Army will itself come under question. So we tried to establish the principle of the government's supremacy over the Army. There was no other objective to the government's attempt to remove the CoAS.

Q: Had your party foreseen that this attempt would bring such polarization among political parties and civil society?

Ananta: The chain of events turned out to be very different from what we had thought. We had thought that it falls under the rights of the government to remove the Army Chief. The five parties in government had also already agreed to it. The chief opposition party had also been informed through various means that the government would at any time seek clarification from the Army Chief. Various diplomatic establishments had already been informed. But there was unnecessary reaction from political parties and diplomatic missions. If the CPN-UML had been able to come up with a clear policy towards this issue, it wouldn't have become so controversial.

Q: What are your views regarding India's response?

Ananta: India has always interfered in Nepal and dictated to us what to do. It has its interests here. The general Nepali public feels this, as does the political class. Loktantra has now come to the country, and India had been taking a softer position than before. But with this incident, it seems to us that India has again gone back to its old way of doing things here.

Q: Why do you feel that India reacted so strongly to your attempt to remove the Army Chief?

Ananta: A story has been constructed that the Maoists wish to capture state power and take over the Army. This is false, but they have been influenced by this story. India's position also indicates that perhaps it is not very positively disposed towards the integration of armies and constitution drafting processes. The results of the Constituent Assembly (CA) elections were not in accordance with Indian desires. Even after that things didn't work according to their plan. They felt their relations with the Maoist-led government had become difficult. Their strong reaction to this recent incident seems to be an expression of this.

Q: There is an impression that the Indians are upset with the Maoists attempts to cultivate China.

Ananta: We have an open border with India. Tens of thousands of our citizens go to India to seek employment. On occasion if we want to travel from one area of Nepal to another, it is easier to go through India. Tens of thousands of Indians from Bengal and Bihar come to Kathmandu to do business. We cannot stop this right now. We understand these realities. But if anyone tries to use these realities in their self-interest, this will not be acceptable to us.

That's why we've been trying to develop more neutral, equidistant relations between India and China. But it seems that India is not happy with this. If this is true, then India has to change its mindset. It is developing its economy, trying to become a global power. But if it's constantly engaged in fights with its immediate neighbours, how will it be able to develop as a global power? For that to happen, it has to demonstrate that it is large hearted.

Q: How will the process of integration and rehabilitation of Maoist combatants proceed after this controversy regarding the attempt to remove the Army Chief?

Ananta: There is the special committee that has two representatives each from the four major parties. This will create the policy for integration and rehabilitation. A technical committee has also been formed of eight members, who, although nominated by the parties, consider themselves to be and are considered by the members of the special committee to be neutral experts. This committee will give recommendations on the modalities of integration and rehabilitation.

Even though work has somewhat halted over the past two weeks, some work is still going on. We recently visited the cantonments. We got a briefing from and held discussions with the Joint Monitoring Coordination Committee (JMCC), Peace Ministry, the People's Liberation Army (PLA), and the expert from UNMIN.

Indian Intelligence Network in Nepal

2009-05-06T17:59:00.002+05:45

Down with Indian expansionist.

Read this

http://telegraphnepal.com/news_det.php?news_id=3704

With the growing political uncertainty, when a Nation-State struggles to guard its precious territorial integrity and sovereignty, the foreign interference naturally grows exponentially. Interference is mainly sought for that there would be no spill over effect in the neighborhood or that the neighbors try to get as much benefit as possible form a faltering nation in the neighborhood.

When India is next door, one doesn’t need an enemy, a saying goes thus in Nepal.

Nepal is undergoing through such a trauma and thus the extraneous pressure is at an all time high.

The India sponsored LOKTANTRA has offered so many gifts to Nepal. The final gift in the pipeline is Sikkimisation. Just wait for it to happen.

Now coming to the point of discussion, we here would like to repeat a story penned by the Dristi Vernacular Weekly, dated July 8, 2008 as it’s main news.

The Dristi writes that the Indian Intelligence Network is already spread well over in some 25 districts nation wide. However, more disgusting is the fact that the present day Pahade ruling elites who do not hesitate in blaming the Madhesi leaders for being anti-nationals for that they demand their inherent rights, are instead at the front stage to allow the Indian authorities to spread their tentacles in 3 more districts plus of this Himalayan nation.

With the government of Nepal accepting the presence of Indian intelligence network in 25 districts already and the needed three more nodes is sure to be added up in the network soon, thus the question is, are we still the citizen of a sovereign nation that we are so proud of? Certainly not!

With borders open, how can we claim that Nepal is a sovereign nation?

“The government of Nepal is allowing the India Intelligence agency to open new outlets in the name of “District Soldiers Board” in some key points inside Nepal ,for example, Mahendranagar, Kanchanpur District; Chaturvedi, Argakhachi District; and Beni, Myagdi District”, reveals Dristi further.

“After a long and difficult procedure, we convinced the Home, Defense and Foreign Secretaries…now the file is in the table of the Chief Secretary of the Government of Nepal”, writes Dristi quoting Narayan Prasad Koirala who is the general secretary of the Nepal Ex-Army Association. Mr. Koirala- a Nepali national himself is involved in the process of opening three more outlets for District Soldiers Board- whose job would be to keep an eye to the Nepalese citizens of the areas mentioned.

However, Mr. Koirala said talking to Dristi that, we have heard that there are concerns that if the Soldiers Board is allowed to open its offices in all 75 districts of Nepal, there will be a big threat to Nepali Nationality…thus we are now concentrating to add only three districts for the time being.

Inviting the devil? Only three more districts? When the devil is in, one district will be more than sufficient.

“Even if there is threat to Nepali nationally, it is necessary to open the offices looking into the benefits of the Indian Army ex-Gorkha soldiers”, Koirala adds strength to his contention.

“A Nepal Government decision made some eight years back had stopped the process-though extremely pressurized by the Indian embassy in Kathmandu, calling it as a biggest threat to Nepali Nationally, yet the present day revolutionary government is allowing the Indian Intelligence Network to spread its tentacles in Nepal and that too willingly”. A Himalayan surprise indeed! The Revolutionary trend stands thus exposed. What say you of this?

“The Indian embassy in Kathmandu had pressurized the Nepal government not to stop the pension distribution and welfare activities for the Gorkha Soldiers in Nepal”.

Such centers that are established to distribute pensions and hold welfare activities for ex-Gorkha Soldiers in Nepal are mainly involved in spying and activities aimed at disintegrating the country.

The government formed under the premiership of Girija Prasad Koirala after the Janaandolan-II revoking the decision made by the previous Nepal government allowed the District Soldiers Board to open its offices in Besisahar, Lamgunj District; Waling, Syangja District; Gorkha, Gorkha District; Kohalpur, Banke District; Tikapur, Kailali District; and Diktel, Khotang District.

Similarly, the government of Nepal during ex-King Gyanendra’s regime under the premiership of Surya Bahadur Thapa had gleefully allowed the Indian embassy in Nepal to establish a Consulate Office in Birgunj. Thapa is a close chum of the Indian establishment. Got the point?

To add, in Nepal’s major cities such as Dharan, Pokhara and Butwal, India has established Army camps under the command of a colonel of the Indian army.

In the districts of Waling, Gulmi, Tanahau, Dang, Surkhet, Baitadi, Chitwan, Palpa, Okhaldhunga, Bhojpur, Terahthum, Taplejung, Ilam, Chainpur, the District Soldiers Board have already been established.

Recently, under the supervision of a Nepal government minister, Mr. Ramesh Lekhak an application for establishing a branch of the soldier board have been already submitted for Dailekh District.

Mr. Lekhak, a NC leader is presumed to be a yes man of Mr. Sher Bahadur Deuba of the Mahakali fame.

Look the network wherein our own august leaders are involved! What a sorry tale!

India has a long term security interest to establish such intelligence nodes in Nepal, writes Dristi quoting a security analyst.

A jumbo Indian army delegation visits all the districts of Nepal now and then where they have such boards to distribute pensions and run welfare activates. However, say analysts such activities of the Indians army are unlawful and threatening the Nepali nationality.

To boot, such visits of the Indian army personnel go unnoticed. Hmmm….

The Indian government in its own territory distributes pension to the ex-army men through bank transfers, yet in Nepal they have been running such camps...thus the Indian ill motive is abundantly clear.

The British Government too runs such camps in Nepal though the head of the British mission is the Secretary of Defense of Nepal yet the head of the Indian District Solder board is the Ambassador of India to Nepal.
No wonder! India is Nepal’s “big brother” and thus such a “special treatment” extended to them by our Jaya Chands and Mirjaffors! For more details log on to the Tuesday issue of the Dristi weekly.
With the growing political uncertainty, when a Nation-State struggles to guard its precious territorial integrity and sovereignty, the foreign interference naturally grows exponentially. Interference is mainly sought for that there would be no spill over effect in the neighborhood or that the neighbors try to get as much benefit as possible form a faltering nation in the neighborhood.

When India is next door, one doesn’t need an enemy, a saying goes thus in Nepal.

Nepal is undergoing through such a trauma and thus the extraneous pressure is at an all time high.

The India sponsored LOKTANTRA has offered so many gifts to Nepal. The final gift in the pipeline is Sikkimisation. Just wait for it to happen.

Now coming to the point of discussion, we here would like to repeat a story penned by the Dristi Vernacular Weekly, dated July 8, 2008 as it’s main news.

The Dristi writes that the Indian Intelligence Network is already spread well over in some 25 districts nation wide. However, more disgusting is the fact that the present day Pahade ruling elites who do not hesitate in blaming the Madhesi leaders for being anti-nationals for that they demand their inherent rights, are instead at the front stage to allow the Indian authorities to spread their tentacles in 3 more districts plus of this Himalayan nation.

With the government of Nepal accepting the presence of Indian intelligence network in 25 districts already and the needed three more nodes is sure to be added up in the network soon, thus the question is, are we still the citizen of a sovereign nation that we are so proud of? Certainly not!

With borders open, how can we claim that Nepal is a sovereign nation?

“The government of Nepal is allowing the India Intelligence agency to open new outlets in the name of “District Soldiers Board” in some key points inside Nepal ,for example, Mahendranagar, Kanchanpur District; Chaturvedi, Argakhachi District; and Beni, Myagdi District”, reveals Dristi further.

“After a long and difficult procedure, we convinced the Home, Defense and Foreign Secretaries…now the file is in the table of the Chief Secretary of the Government of Nepal”, writes Dristi quoting Narayan Prasad Koirala who is the general secretary of the Nepal Ex-Army Association. Mr. Koirala- a Nepali national himself is involved in the process of opening three more outlets for District Soldiers Board- whose job would be to keep an eye to the Nepalese citizens of the areas mentioned.

However, Mr. Koirala said talking to Dristi that, we have heard that there are concerns that if the Soldiers Board is allowed to open its offices in all 75 districts of Nepal, there will be a big threat to Nepali Nationality…thus we are now concentrating to add only three districts for the time being.

Inviting the devil? Only three more districts? When the devil is in, one district will be more than sufficient.

“Even if there is threat to Nepali nationally, it is necessary to open the offices looking into the benefits of the Indian Army ex-Gorkha soldiers”, Koirala adds strength to his contention.

“A Nepal Government decision made some eight years back had stopped the process-though extremely pressurized by the Indian embassy in Kathmandu, calling it as a biggest threat to Nepali Nationally, yet the present day revolutionary government is allowing the Indian Intelligence Network to spread its tentacles in Nepal and that too willingly”. A Himalayan surprise indeed! The Revolutionary trend stands thus exposed. What say you of this?
The Indian embassy in Kathmandu had pressurized the Nepal government not to stop the pension distribution and welfare activities for the Gorkha Soldiers in Nepal”.
Such centers that are established to distribute pensions and hold welfare activities for ex-Gorkha Soldiers in Nepal are mainly involved in spying and activities aimed at disintegrating the country.
The government formed under the premiership of Girija Prasad Koirala after the Janaandolan-II revoking the decision made by the previous Nepal government allowed the District Soldiers Board to open its offices in Besisahar, Lamgunj District; Waling, Syangja District; Gorkha, Gorkha District; Kohalpur, Banke District; Tikapur, Kailali District; and Diktel, Khotang District.
Similarly, the government of Nepal during ex-King Gyanendra’s regime under the premiership of Surya Bahadur Thapa had gleefully allowed the Indian embassy in Nepal to establish a Consulate Office in Birgunj. Thapa is a close chum of the Indian establishment. Got the point?
To add, in Nepal’s major cities such as Dharan, Pokhara and Butwal, India has established Army camps under the command of a colonel of the Indian army.
In the districts of Waling, Gulmi, Tanahau, Dang, Surkhet, Baitadi, Chitwan, Palpa, Okhaldhunga, Bhojpur, Terahthum, Taplejung, Ilam, Chainpur, the District Soldiers Board have already been established.
Recently, under the supervision of a Nepal government minister, Mr. Ramesh Lekhak an application for establishing a branch of the soldier board have been already submitted for Dailekh District.
Mr. Lekhak, a NC leader is presumed to be a yes man of Mr. Sher Bahadur Deuba of the Mahakali fame.
Look the network wherein our own august leaders are involved! What a sorry tale!
India has a long term security interest to establish such intelligence nodes in Nepal, writes Dristi quoting a security analyst.
A jumbo Indian army delegation visits all the districts of Nepal now and then where they have such boards to distribute pensions and run welfare activates. However, say analysts such activities of the Indians army are unlawful and threatening the Nepali nationality.
To boot, such visits of the Indian army personnel go unnoticed. Hmmm….
The Indian government in its own territory distributes pension to the ex-army men through bank transfers, yet in Nepal they have been running such camps...thus the Indian ill motive is abundantly clear.
The British Government too runs such camps in Nepal though the head of the British mission is the Secretary of Defense of Nepal yet the head of the Indian District Solder board is the Ambassador of India to Nepal.
No wonder! India is Nepal’s “big brother” and thus such a “special treatment” extended to them by our Jaya Chands and Mirjaffors! For more details log on to the Tuesday issue of the Dristi weekly.

And now the Indian intelligence is operated by Apca House inthe name of newspaper and journalism. it is the contect point of the RAW agents to gather information in the name of selling newspapers thay are selling Nepal's informations to RAW.

'India encouraged Prez to take 'unconstitutional move'

2009-05-05T12:34:00.000+05:45

A Central Secretariat member of Unified CPN (Maoist) has claimed that President Ram Baran Yadav overturned the government's decision to sack Army chief Rookmangud Katawal coming under pressure from foeign power centers and that it has put the constitution making and peace process in serious jeopardy.
He further said that the Maoists will protest the "unconstitutional move" both in the parliament and in the streets, but assured that they will be peaceful.
"The president nullified the decision of sacking the army chief coming under pressure from foreign powers," claimed Lilamani Pokharel at a program organized by Revolutionary Journalist's Association in Nepalgunj Monday.
Upon asked who was he referring to by "foreign power centers", he said that the President was encouraged to take an "unconstitutional move" in the direction of the India.
The remark by the Maoist leader comes at a time when the former rebel party has already decided to challenge the President's move in the court and launch protest against it both in the parliament and the street.
Maintaining that the President's move has encroached upon the rights of the people, he said the new round of dispute seen between the government and President will overshadow the main task of constitution drafting, state restructuring and the entire peace process.
He also dared political parties who he said encouraged the President to take the "unconstitutional move" to garner support of 301 members that is needed to form a new government.
Pokharel, however, assured that the Maoist People's Liberation Army won't leave the UN-monitored cantonment even till the last hour, reiterating that Maoists are committed towards the peace process.

Prachanda, Katawal and more

2009-05-05T09:57:00.000+05:45

The dictates of foreign master had to be stopped somewhere before this country becomes a total satellite

Basanta Lohani

I support the government’s decision to sack the Army Chief Rukmangat Katawal not because he deserved to be chucked out but because the dictates of foreign master had to be stopped somewhere before this country becomes a total satellite. The foreign intervention has been too much over the years. Enough is enough.

Katawal has become a casualty, partly because of his obstinacy. So is the Maoist government, as the major coalition partner Nepal Communist Party -United Marxist Leninist has pulled back from the government. As it appears, a new UML led government with Nepali Congress support is likely to replace the present Maoist government unless the Maoist are able to pull out pigeon from the cap.

The contradiction between the latent and manifest design of the Maoists became yawning after the rebels catapulted to the government. Politics turned into brinkmanship plunged the new republic into uncertainty of change. This has put the country in the whirlpool of confusion and chaos, robbing off the people of their peace and country of its peace process. The conflict assumed a different dimension. A law-abiding citizen became vulnerable, as those who could fire the shots did not abide by law. The setting largely changed from gun to muscle power.

The parties started disputing to dispute over issues, many of which were nonissues. This is the crux of the feud between the Prachanda led government and Katawal led Nepali Army. In the process, loads of distrust, hatred and animosity piled up like the garbage in Kathmandu. National politics of consensus that made Nepal a republic fragmented further both at psychological and organizational plane. This, in turn, prodded intra party cleavages. Thus, the otherwise uneasy inter party relationship came to peril. More than the government, the very peace process seems to be at stake

The president is ceremonial but has the responsibility of safeguarding the constitution of the country. The solo onslaught of the Maoist, while the coalition partners boycotted the cabinet meeting, may not, however, infringe the sanctity of government decision. A decision made by the prime minister when is put in the minutes by the chief secretary becomes the government decision. Katawal is out unless it is reversed by the government or by the court.

The Maoists have shown remarkable courage. Even when they were almost isolated, they defied and did not allow the foreign interference to prevail this time. A decision has to be from within, even realizing that nobody is ‘autonomous ‘in the present world. Their latent design is not in line with peace process. Katawal is not to be a casualty. Again, this country is but ours. The elected government makes its decision that it deems fit. Why should any outsider run from pillar to post to load his decision? Let the constitutional mechanism prevail.

Lohani is a Kathmandu based writer. He can be reached at buba@wlink.com.np

(Editor’s Note: Nepalis, wherever they live, as well as friends of Nepal around the globe are requested to contribute their views/opinions/recollections etc. on issues concerning present day Nepal to the Guest Column of Nepalnews. Length of the article should not be more than 1,000 words and may be edited for the purpose of clarity and space. Relevant photos as well as photo of the author may also be sent along with the article. Please send your write-ups to editors@mos.com.np)

How was Maoists forced to sep down

2009-05-04T15:43:00.000+05:45

The peace process of Nepal is now in trouble and India pushed Nepal into another conflict. Indian never wanted and wants peaceful Nepal. It didnot supported King Birendra's propose of peace state in the past too. Because it wants to occupy Nepal's water resources and other natural resources that is possible when there is instability and conflict. So, it can play a peace maker and big brother. But Big brothers is naked this time when Maoists resigned by not bowing to their pressure.
Six indian agents arrived to force the president dr Ram baran yadav to go against the consitituion and back Katwal. UML's Jhalnath Kahnal, Madhav Nepal and KP oli and Girija were in their regular touch from the Indian embassy and the RAW agents who came to Kathmandu for the mission.
They came as journalists of the media house that has Indian investment and operated from there and planned the downfall of maoist government because they stood against the wish of Indian expansionist.
The villains of Nepal's peace rajendra dahal and Biddhyadhar Mallik forced the president to write the letter that was drafted by the army. The RAW agents Rajednra Dahal and Biddhyadhar Mallik directed from Apca House and Indian Embassy.
India pushed nepal into the chaoes and Maoists slapped on India's face by not pleading to save their power and stepped down.
It is a great slap into Indian expansionists face that don't meddle in Nepali politicas.
The Apca house is the shelter for such agents and their agency people where they pose as journalist and direct the parties and their leaders what to do. The parties funded and run by RAW UML and Nepali Congress thought they won.
the journalists of the big media houses who are on payroll of Indian embassy didinot understand that the resignation was a slap to them as well that Nepal can handle its matters itself and donot need to bow down to India for power.
The big newspapers house like Apca should be closed to stop RAW operations and help the weekly newspapers like us to survive for the nation and sovereignty. Indian were slaves and are still slaves of Americans and british but they try to shoe dadagiri to small countries like nepal and Bhutan to show their mascularity like a drunk and impotent husband beats wife to shoe his bravity. The impotent Indian should learn that Its a
Down with journalists working for Indian and selling their mothers and sisters to Indians for money.
Down with impotent Indian Expensionist and its dadagiri.
Lets kick all the Indian out of this country and close the RAW propaganda machines like Indian embassy and Apca house. They are cancer for Nepal.

South Block screwed up BIG

2009-04-26T12:59:00.000+05:45

Indrani Bagchi

India needs to wake up and smell the coffee in Nepal. Last week, India exhibited some truly clumsy diplomacy in Kathmandu, which was astounding for the fact that it showed India as the nasty big brother that Nepalis often accuse India of.
“Prachanda” Pushpa Dahal’ s showcause notice to the army chief, Rukmangad Katawal, was high-handed, dictatorial and rightly attracted the ire of the other political parties. But to see the Indian ambassador hot-footing it to Baluwatar, pleading with Prachanda to desist, showed the kind of desperation that has completely laid India bare in Nepal.
Even given fears that the Nepalese Army may have been considering a “coup” may have been uppermost on his mind, surely diplomacy throws up better ways of doing things. If the US, or any other country had done this to India, South Block would be up in flames.
Its been clear for a while that Prachanda wanted to throw out Katawal and install the Maoist-friendly Kul Bahadur Khadka in his place. Its also been clear that Katawal has been resisting efforts to integrate the PLA cadres into the army. That may be something the Indian army can screw up its nose at, but that should be the Nepalis’ business.
Prachanda, as elected PM is fully within his rights to question the army chief, because no matter what, the army has to serve the popular government of the day. How did South Block forget this mantra?
Katawal is no great lover of the Maoist government, and has been known to be very close to the deposed king Gyanendra, having been adopted by his father King Mahendra.
But for democratic India to intervene on behalf of an army chief in Nepal is to send out absolutely the wrong signals. Its blatant intereference in the internal affairs of another country, for one. Second, it shows that India would rather support the army than a popularly elected government, even if you don’t like the colour of their stripes.
Nepalese media have published detailed records of how foreign secretary Shiv Shankar Menon tried to persuade the UML chief touring China that he should stop the sacking. Now that was really clever.
Katawal is now “burnt toast” as someone said, ruefully. Because no matter what India says, or perhaps because of it, Prachanda will get rid of him. Then he will resume his now interrupted visit to China and sign that treaty of peace and friendship that South Block was so against.
When elections were held in April 2008, it was a fair and participatory process that threw up the ruling combine in Kathmandu which had few outstanding debts to India, like the older political parties, army or even discredited royalty, the traditional pillars of Nepal.
India has known, since then, that things could never be as good as they had been, when India ordered and Nepalese followed. The Maoists are not India-friendly, and South Block is not Maoist-friendly. The Maoists want to spread their risks by getting China into the game as well. No surprises here, and India should have been mature enough to deal with this particular challenge.
India is partly responsible for Nepal running to the arms of the Chinese - that’s now very clear. India has many levers to ensure that its interests are addressed in Nepal, if only India chooses to utilize them. But beyond that, India needs to cut Nepal some slack. Let them go, guys. Cut those apron strings.

And India has its day as heat gathers

2009-04-24T13:39:00.001+05:45

The Coup that has been planned backed by Indian expansionist and enter Indian army into Nepal.

A report from the RAW paid newspaper. RAW has on pay roll a lots of journalists in Nepal apart from its propaganda machine APCA publication that is a whorehouse with Nepali girls being employed for sex and sex only by Indians.

It sounds surreal, reads like a page from a nail-biting thriller.
On Thursday, 25 generals were present at the meeting of Principal Staff Officers at the Army Headquarters. The agenda was a serious one: Maoists are in a larger mission than to eliminate Nepal Army. They were out to derail the peace process and destroy Nepali democracy. And something had to be done to stop that.

It was PSOs and Valley commanders first meeting after the Maoist-led government issued a clarification letter to Chief of Army Staff Rookmangud Katwal.

The meeting started with DGMO (Director General of Military Operations) Gaurav Rana, saying that this was a historical moment and therefore it called for a frank discussion. “We are facing a tsunami and we must stop it,” he said. “The virus which is trying to destroy the Army is in this room.”

Himalaya Thapa, who heads the No. 1 Brigade added, “The root of the trouble is here. We must look for it and get rid of it.” A number of other generals also spoke at the meeting.

All the ire was vented against Lt. Gen. Kul Bahadur Khadka, who remained silent right through the meeting. Khadka, second in command in the Nepal Army, is the supposed Maoist choice to succeed Katawal.

At last, it was Katawal's turn. He said, “We should not let politics enter our house. We should stop this tendency to knock on the politician's door for promotion.”

For the first time, Lt. Gen. Khadka found himself completely exposed in front of the generals and the Nepal Army establishment, said a senior Army officer recounting Thursday's event.

He and other Army officers recounted to the Post late Thursday how on Wednesday they came close to mounting a “soft coup” to counter Khadka and the Maoist plan. The threat, they said, pushed the Maoists on to the back foot.

This is how the plan was. Maoist leaders, ministers and other selected individuals would be arrested. Former king would be put in Nagarjun Palace in “line arrest.” Prime Minister Pushpa Kamal Dahal, Nepali Congress President Girija Prasad Koirala and a number of other leaders would be cut off from the public.

Singhadurbar, Baluwatar, YCL and Maoist offices, the Ministers' Quarters at Pulchowk would be put under 'siege.' At the UN-monitored cantonments, the arms containers would be guarded, but the PLA combatants would not be harmed and would be allowed to leave the cantonments for home or for foreign employment. UNMIN monitors would be put in helicopters and flown to Kathmandu. “They would be treated with dignity,” said an Army officer.

“It was a plan that just was not a military coup,” said the officer. “I don't want to disclose the exact timing of the move. Such things are always kept secret.” There were hints that the “soft coup” would have taken place possibly in the wee hours on Wednesday.

All this started after the prime minister demanded Katawal's resignation on Sunday. By Monday, insiders say, Katawal seemed enthused by a renewed confidence. “By then he had received strong backing from India and he felt emboldened. For our part, we gave him a lot of moral support,” said another senior officer. “We told him 'don't worry. We will get the support. We proposed a coup. We had no time to lose. Losing time meant the Maoists would get Katawal.”

Having listened to all the calls from Army officers, Katawal finally said, “That's not the right way to go about it. He suggested that the best way to move forward would be through the confines of the statute.”

It was important for Katawal to take the president in confidence. “India played a crucial role to establish the link between the Army and the president,” the officer said.

“We were not the planners for presidential rule,” said the officer. “We were involved only in the military side of the operation.” An official with the president's office said, the president was under tremendous pressure from the Army to react, adding: “But we were not pushing for presidential rule.” The pressure on the Army was huge, said the officer. “Maoists and Kul Bahadur were using each other to execute their plan. Kul Bahadur would be made the chief as soon as Katawal submitted his clarification. The plan was to get rid of Katawal by any means. Even by killing or abducting him, or putting him under house arrest. Making Kul Bahadur the chief by hook or crook.”

According to the officers, Kul Bahaudr had submitted a plan to the Maoists months in advance and they liked it. The Army chief would get a 35-year service period; others 30- year period; all 19,000 Maoist combatants would be integrated in the Army; PLA commander Nanda Kishor Pun “Pasang” would be made Major General and many others would get brigadier positions; there would be no new entries in the Army for a while; and 50 percent of the Army would be used for development work.

Kul Bahadur, according to the officers, had also lobbied with the Maoist-led government not to give the eight generals (whose retirement has been temporarily stayed by the Supreme Court) extension. Kul Bahadur, they added, also gave the generals the impression that the Army chief was unsuccessful to defend their case with the Defence Minister.

Sood goes to Delhi

2009-04-23T17:22:00.002+05:45

Indian Ambassador to Nepal Rakesh Sood today left for New Delhi for consultations. Sood, who met Prime Minister Prachanda this morning, is expected to brief the Indian Government about the recent political developments in the country including the government's plan to sack the Chief of Army Staff Rukmangud Katawal. Spokesperson of the Indian Embassy in Kathmandu, Tshering W Sherpa said that ambassador Sood left for New Delhi for consultations with the authorities and would be returning to Kathmandu in a day or two.

Is this a sovereign country

2009-04-21T07:09:00.002+05:45

Kathmandu, Apr 21 (PTI) The Maoist governments move to force the ouster of the Nepal Army chief seems to have isolated the ultra-left group, with the main Opposition party disrupting parliament and moving to polarize politics in the country against the former rebels.

The Prachanda-led government served an ultimatum to the Army chief Rukmangad Katawal, ordering him to explain why its directives on the removal of eight generals and halting recruitment in the army were ignored by him. The move to issue the notice is being interpreted as an indication of government's plan to remove the army chief.

Nepali Congress and 15 other political parties, including key coalition partner CPN-UML, have opposed the Maoists decision to seek clarification from Army Chief Rukmangad Katawal without proper ground.

Fears have been expressed that the deadlock between the government and most of the political parties could derail the stalled landmark peace process in Nepal.

Information Minister Krishna Bahadur Mahara yesterday said a notice was issued to Army Chief, seeking a clarification on the military's recent recruitment, its hastiness in reinstating eight generals retired by the government and its decision not to participate in the National Games.

The Nepali Congress, led by former premier G P Koirala, boycotted the Parliament yesterday in protest against the governments move to seek clarification from Army Chief, terming it as strategy to weaken the national institution.

But maoists willnot be able to kick out Katawal as he has India behind him. Koirala did also want to sack him but India said not to do so and now sooner or later Rakesh Sood will start making rounds of baluwatar and threaten Prachnada not to sack him.

The relation between the India and Indianspy agencies and Nepali Army top brass is since along cordial. The massacre of late King Birendra and his family under the protection of 10,000 Army men in the Narayanhiti Royal palace was the design of RAW and Nepali army top brass helped execite it.
If the army cannot protect its patron King how can it protect Nepali people. But RAW will use all its power like newspapers and paid journalists and New Delhi will come to rescue Katawalas he is their man and they have to protect him.

A speciaal RAW agent Dhurb Painly has come to kathmandu to gather all the information and report back to RAW headquarters. He was posted in Kashmir before. The Sood and his agents the political parties will help Katawal and Maoists will have to back off.

Indian Game Plan

2009-03-19T12:22:00.000+05:45

By all accounts, India is all set to review the currency rate between the two countries very soon. At present one hundred Indian rupees is equivalent to Nepalese rupees 160 and according to this fixed rate, the rates of other foreign currency, including the US dollar are set.
That this fiscal agreement was going to be reviewed that was reported by the People’s Review some months back. In that report a high ranking Nepali industrialist had revealed to this Weekly that none less than the then Indian Finance Minister P Chidabaram had told him about India’s plans of making her currency convertible in the international market. As our currency's exchange rate is fixed with the Indian currency, our currency would face serious setback after the Indian decision, this Weekly had explained. But the concerned sector didn't take the issue seriously at that time.
“I don’t know why our political leaders and economists are not doing anything about this, which can finish off our whole economy,” he had then said.
Now also, reliable sources claim that the Nepali economy would totally cave in, if this policy of India is implemented. “There are reports that India has made an elaborate plan to implement this plan,” one source said and he warned that the new rate of the Indian currency could go as high as Nepali rupees 215 to 250 for one hundred IC after that decision of India.
Another alarming factor is that there seems to be a well worked out plan to first create a shortage of Nepali currency in the market. This could be done both by India buying Nepali currency for a short term and also by panic buying of foreign currency by the Nepalese themselves. “Most of the Nepalese industrialists and prominent people hardly have any Nepali currency, they have already whisked away their hard cash to foreign banks or bought foreign property,” another source said.
According to a Rastra Bank source, it would not be that difficult for a country like India to buy large amounts of Nepalese currency to make a success of a political and economic agenda.
He added that if the present plan of the Indian policy makers is a success, then the price of one US dollar could go higher than NC Rs. 100. This would take a terrible toll on the country’s economy and would further aggravate the already difficult conditions of the average Nepali individual.
“If such a situation comes, no government would be able to exist in Nepal and the successfully functioning banks of the country would turn bankrupt,” a senior economist warned.
This could be a deliberate plan of India to make Nepal a failed state and make it easier for it to impose its policies in this troubled nation.

Tharus protest and role of Media

2009-03-06T17:27:00.001+05:45

The Nepali media didnot support the Tharu movement and neither the UN agencies or foreign embassies Like they did earlier. In the Madhesh movement, Indian embassy was more active for the right of madhesh and ethnic rights.But in Tharu movement it distanced itself. Everyone know the intention of India and its active role in Madhesh. But there is no madhesh in Nepal. There is terai and the Tharus are the original inhibitants of terai.
The madheshi parties cal for the right of madheshi who are bihari but they don't talk of Nepal's land encroached by India.
The Bihari influence in terai supported by Indian embassy in Kathmandu and Birgunj consulate is open secret.
The media has also not played its role effectively in the tharu movement as fear Indian embassy.
The RAW propaganda machine Apca and its publications himalayan times and annapurna post didnot give importance to tharu protest which is open as it was against their mission of disintegrating Nepal.
The Raw gives month training on Nepal's politic beforeww sending its people in Apca. RAW also teaches them Nepali so that they can understand and communicate in Nepali. Their work is to send all the informations to delhi headquarters. Apca is a randi khana where all the Indian have two two Nepali girls for themselves as theiur sex slaves. They not not only involve in newspaper business but Apca is involved in Nepali girls trafficiking and housing, and manpower. The newspapers are run by Indians for indian authority not for Nepal and Nepali and the 80% staff are Indian.
Such Raw propaganda machine should be closed to save the nepal's soveriegnty and save the country. let's give rights to Tharus, who are the originals people froim terai.
Today three people, a police officer, a protestor and a pedestrian were killed in Chitwan District. But the Nepali media didnot took any interest to report as they are run by the Indian embassy and paid by the Indian embassy.
In the fifth day of the indefinite period closure of Nepal's Tarai belt called by the Tharuhat United Struggle Alliance (TUSA), protesting against the government's decision to classify the indigenous Tharu Community in the Madhesi category, the three people had lost their lives.
The death of the police officer took place after he was attacked by a sharp knife by the protestors, another officer scrummed to minor injuries in the attack.
Fatally injured Kumar Budathoki- the police officer later died at the Bharatpur Hospital.
A Tharu protestor Kamal Chaudhari died last night who was severely thrashed by the police and a pedestrian who was injured by bullets fired by the police is also declared dead.
In Chitwan district alone more than Two dozen protestors, Sixteen General Police officers and Four Armed police officers are admitted to a nearby hospital.
In the mean time, the Tharu protest continues in Chitwan district defying curfew orders imposed by the District Administration Office.

Indian expansionist and its real face

2009-02-21T17:18:00.000+05:45

Pranav Mukharji's Statement: A question mark on our sovereignty?

Dear Friends,

In an interview to Arabian television All Zazera, Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister of India, Pranav Mukharjee, he said that Maoist have come to the peace process and the government under the initiation and influence of India. He has ignored the sacrifice of other political parties, civil societies and the brave Nepali people who sacrificed their life for the peace and historical transformation. If it is really true, the present change that Nepal is experiencing is due to India and not due to the effort of Nepali people. Then the change or so called political development is on the greater interest of India than of Nepal. India's role also could not be undermined. They must have played some role from the diplomatic level. But isn't it the total disrespect to Nepal and its independency that India is taking credit whatever the positive development Nepali people have brought out. If India really wants Nepal to be peaceful and prosperous, Does it have a gut to solve the refugee problems that has also affected Nepal. Why are the political parties keeping their mouth shut in such a direct intervention in this issue by such a higher profile politician?

We believe that the historical movements led and carried out by Nepali people are the major driving factor to bring about the historical changes in Nepal.The international communities have no share at all.

Koshish strongly condemns such type of gross attack and intervention by any foreign forces in the name of peace and development and comes to fore to protest against such acts.

Koshish is the movement led by highly patriotic Nepali youths to reach each and every Nepali citizen's mind and heart with a nationalistic message that we must struggle and fight for the peace and betterment of our society and the nation protesting against the undemocratic attack of any sort by foreign forces.

In this regard, Koshish tries to create a networking and platform for or of all the patriotic youths of Nepal to fight for our nation's independency and sovereignty. The time has come for all the youths to gather and utilize the strength to carry out a long lasting struggle till we become a dignified citizen in the eyes of foreign forces.

Therefore, Koshish would like to invite respected people and young friends to take part in the action oriented discussion program.

Date: 21 February, Falgun 10(saturday)
Reporting Time:7:30 am(Please be on time)
Program Time: 8:00-10:00 am
Venue: Martin Chautari(near by prashuti griha)
The program will be concluded with signature campaign which will be submitted to the concerned parties.

Sincerely,
Mr.Manoj Pandit
Coordinator
Koshish Movement
Ph:9841296407

Please forward this information to your friends and concern people.

(PS: The RAW wants K P Oli to be chairman of CPN-UMP as he is their man for long. The RAW instalation in Nepal APCA has sent a messenger to lobby for him. He is the one who is responsible for the murder of Madan Bhandari.)

Sood meets Prime Minister

2009-02-10T19:55:00.000+05:45

Indian ambassador to Nepal Rakesh Sood called on Prime Minister Pushpa Kamal Dahal at the latter's official residence in Baluwatar Tuesday morning.

Bilateral issues including border security, preparations for power purchase from India, and the current political developments in Nepal were chiefly discussed at the half-hour long meeting that started at 7:30 am, it is learnt.

Meetings between the Indian ambassador and top political leaders are often considered politically significant and this one comes a day after 18 political parties in the Constituent Assembly decided to urge the Prime Minister to call early parliamentary session to decide the bills that are being introduced by the government through ordinance.

The RAW is also active and held meeting at Annapurna Hotel and Yak and Yeti Hotel last week in the presence of RAW agents active in Nepal in the name of APCA. The selected Madheshi leaders and congressi leaders took part in the meeting called in the name of The Himalayan Times and Annapurna Post. The special Indian agents active in Nepal and hold talks with various Congress political leaders and UNL political leaders and briefed them on future plan.

The Himalayan Times and Annapurna Post are backing Rishi Dhamala because Dhamal is also a RAW agent and these two newspapers are RAW propagande machine. The RAW agents are openly in the name of newspaper directing the political leaders to do what India wants. Dhamala is not a single case Indian embassy and RAW is using most of the Nepali journalists like Dhamala for information collection. Himalayan Times and Annapurna Post is just a show piece.

Nepali team denied entry

2009-02-02T00:20:00.000+05:45

House team denied entry
The Indian Embassy on Sunday prohibited the team of Foreign Relations and Human Rights Committee of the Legislature-Parliament from going to Sandakpur while the team was heading toward Phyalot of Panchthar district via Sandakpur to inspect the encroached land in the Nepali territory.
In order to go to Panchthar, one has to use Indian land via Sandakpur. "Saying that it cannot provide security to the team members during the visit, the embassy denied us permission to go there," said Padma Lal Bishwokarma. The team arrived here on Saturday to inspect the border areas in the eastern part of the country following media reports of land encroachment at various points by Indian side.

---------------

A team of Foreign Relations and Human Rights Committee at the Legislature-Parliament, which began field study on encroached land in various bordering areas of the eastern districts on Saturday, reached the conclusion that the Indian side has encroached Nepali land at different points on various pretexts.
The team led by committee Chairman Padma Lal Bishwokarma said on Sunday that land in Manebhanjyang, Pulkhola, Simana, Phatak, Hile, Chhabbise and Guphapatal have been encroached.
“It's an issue of grave concern as the land being cultivated by Nepalis for years have now become parts of Indian territory,” said Bishwokarma, adding that the recently prepared map of border areas cannot be regarded as reliable for the demarcation between the two countries.
The team, which held inter-actions with locals, administration, human rights activists and police, came to such a conclusion after inspecting the encroached land in the areas.
“We will submit the report of our field study as soon as possible to exert pressure on the government to find amicable solution of the problems,” he added.
According to team members, security personnel of Seema Suraksha Bal (SSB) -- an Indian paramilitary force deployed along Nepal-India border -- has also set up its camp inside Nepali territory in Pulkhola of Pashupatinagar.
The SSB has set up another camp at Hile of the district- in the no-man's-land area- the delegation said.
At Guphapatal, SSB force had set up its camp near a border pillar which they had removed despite protests by locals. A house and a school have also been built in the no-man's-land in Chhabbise area by the Indians.
“In most of the areas we inspected, it was found that chunks of land have been encroached upon by the Indian side,” said Kamala Thapa, a team member.

House panel looks into border encroachment

2009-02-01T09:18:00.001+05:45

A team of Foreign Relations and Human Rights Committee of the Legislature-Parliament has began field study of encroached lands in Ilam and Panchthar districts on Saturday.
The team, headed by committee chairman Padma Lal Bishwokarma, arrived here after recent media reports that Seema Suraksha Bal, the Indian paramilitary force deployed along Nepal-India border, set up its camp encroaching Nepali territory at Sriantu in Ilam a few weeks ago.
The team started consulting administrative officials, journalists, human rights activists and locals in Ilam on Saturday.
The team members have plans to inspect various bordering areas in Chhabbise of Sriantu VDC, Manebhanjyang, Pulkhola, Sandakpur, Hile and Prabung of the two districts that share the border with India.

Nepa bans Indian movie

2009-01-23T15:04:00.000+05:45

Indian did it again and they will never learn to respect other. They think they are superhuman. Down with Indian expansionist !!!

Six years after Nepal banned a section of Hindi films due to erupting violence, the new Maoist-led government Thursday officially banned Bollywood's first Kung Fu comedy 'Chandni Chowk to China' after continued public protests over its misrepresentation of the Buddha's birthplace.
The formal ban by the ministry of information and communications came as cinemas in Nepal had on their own stopped screening the controversial film Wednesday.
The government move followed street protests by students, who said the film was an attack on Nepal's territorial integrity and sovereignty with its false claim that the Buddha was born in India.
"The Buddha was born in Nepal; learn to respect Nepal's identity and sovereignty," students screamed during a protest rally before an engineering college in the valley Thursday. In the Lainchaur area near the Indian Embassy in Kathmandu, protesters marched in silence, waving placards.
A group of protesters also handed over a memorandum to the Indian embassy.
All Kathmandu Valley cinemas hurriedly dropped the Akshay Kumar-Deepika Padukone starrer and began showing the earlier Bollywood release 'Ghajini' or Nepali films.
"The trouble was created by the narration in the film," said Nepali film director K.P. Pathak, who heads the Nepal Film Directors' Association that is urging audiences to boycott all foreign films that project wrong messages.
"About five minutes into the film, the narration introduces the hero as someone born in India, the Buddha's birthplace," Pathak told us.
The Buddha was born Prince Siddharth in Lumbini in south Nepal in 623 BC. Thousands of pilgrims and tourists visit the area every year to pay their homage.
Before being released in Nepal on Friday, 'Chandni Chowk to China' was viewed by Nepal's censor board which objected to the dialogue. Subsequently, the distributors deleted it.
But though the offending dialogue was removed, the word got around and students stormed the deluxe Jai Nepal cinema Wednesday, tearing down posters of the film.
Remembering the violence that flared up in 2000 after comments were wrongly attributed to Bollywood star Hrithik Roshan, the distributors of 'Chandni Chowk to China' Wednesday decided to can it.

The RAW installations in Kathmandu like APCA house should also be closed as soon as possible otherwise such anti-Nepal acrivities wil never stop as the Indian embassy and APCA are plotting againtrs the sovereignty of Nepal. 90 per cent of the APCA staff are Indian from Darjeeling, Sikkim, Kalimpong and its running a campaign for Indiam idol also. Nepal government should ban all the RAW offices in Kathmandu.

Let Pashupati make free of Indian crooks

2009-01-08T12:59:00.000+05:45

Let Pashupati and the whole Nepal free of Indian crooks.

A sovereign country Nepal has eveery right to make decision that are beneficial for the country. Why the hell Indian cry here. They have been looting Nepal and manipulatiung Nepalese citing century old relationship ; But what has Nepal gained from thoses bastard Indians, they have always been looting us and in return giving one ambulance building one school.

Nepal doesnot need the criocodile's tears of bastard Indians. If they are big, so what; their heart is too small, smaller than chicken. And the big mouth Indians should be smacked from pashupati, and from Nepal. If they are capable why are they here. If they are not making money, they will not be here.

Can Rakesh Sood keep SSB out of Nepal's border, otherwise why is he barking?

Indian ambassador Rakesh Sood on Wednesday said that the bilateral relations between Nepal and India would not be affected though the controversy over the appointment of new Nepali priests at the Pashupatinath temple have disappointed some of the Indians.
Why should be?
Can a Nepali ambassador go on gioving speech in India? Thenm why let this dhoti freek everywhere? Senf this crook bank. We don't need any Indian crooks.

India’s Samajbadi Party Mulayam Singh Yadav and Amar Singh regretted the Maoist-led government and dubbed the replacement of the south Indian priests with new Nepali priests at the temple a politicisation of the time-honoured tradition.
They are motre bastartd than any body on earth as they visit Pashupati to meet Bhatta not Pashupati. Go back to India and do politics over religions don't try to scatter your garbage in Nepal.

Bharitiya Janata Party Lal Krishna Advani expressed dissatisfaction over the controversy of appointment of Nepali priests at Pashupatinath temple, one of the holiest shrine of Hindus. Why should he cann he smacvk Soniya the christian inj his country? Then why hue and cry in Nepal.

Down with Indian imperialists !!!
KIck all Indian out of Nepal. They have done more harm to Nepal than good. WE have thousands of instances and examples for Indian evil in Nepal.
Save Nepal from evil Indian encroachment !!!
Close all RAW officies like Himalayan Times in Nepal.

Indian ambassador flouted diplomatic norms: Yadav

2008-12-22T21:07:00.000+05:45

Minister for Foreign Affairs Upendra Yadav Monday accused the Indian ambassador of breaching the "diplomatic norms" by meeting the former king without first informing the Nepal government.
Speaking at a press meet organized in Biratnagar, Minister Yadav claimed that ambassador Rakesh Sood met former king Gyanendra by going against the "tradition" of informing the foreign minister before meeting any "political figure".
Although the "tradition" talked about by Minister Yadav is clearly a matter related to diplomatic protocol, only in few instances have the foreign envoys based in Kathmandu - and especially the Indian ambassador - been found abiding by it in the past.
Minister Yadav, however, remained silent on whether the foreign ministry will seek clarification from ambassador Sood or not over the incident.
It has been learnt that Sood met former king Gyanendra at the posh Soaltee hotel last week. He is said to have later informed about the details of the meeting to prime minister Pushpa Kamal Dahal.
What's cooking between India and former king Gyanendra? Is India staging his comeback now?

Save Nepal media campaign

2008-12-07T19:26:00.000+05:45

Be aware of these two "media captains"

Himalmedia
Himalmedia, established in 1998, has five founders – Ambika Shrestha chairperson and Kanak Mani Dixit, Kunda Dixit, Rajiv Raj Bhandari and Sajib Raj Bhandari directors. The three publications of Himalmedia – Himal Khabarpatrika, Nepali Times and Wave — are being published under the involvement and direction of Kunda Dixit and Kanak Mani Dixit, who are brothers by blood relation and journalists by profession.
While Kanak is the publisher and editor of Himal Khabarpatrika, Kunda is the publisher and editor of Nepali Times and Wave.
Himal Khabarpatrika covers politics, economic sector and other areas, Nepali Times is targeted diplomatic crop and Wave covers youth and entertainment.
Besides serving public, all the three publications are being published to aid their own other businesses and are making good profits alone from advertisement with Rs 50 million standing profit every year. However, the expense is only around Rs 30 million. High prices of the three newspapers have also been significantly contributing to the company.
Listed as "Number 1" three years ago, Himal Khabarpatrika is ranked at Number 2 on circulation basis and Number 3 on news content's basis. But the Dixit brothers, on the pretext of incurring losses, have been collecting grants from several donor organizations.
On various occasions and pretexts, they have also been collecting around Rs 10 million from the government.
Similarly, threatening businessmen of publishing negative news, some Rs 50 million have been amassed. On the other hand, some businessmen provide advertisement on the condition of not publishing their news.
The Dixit brothers are active being wolf in sheep's clothing, but the other partners stay mum.
The list of their malpractice continues. They also gain various benefits from I/NGOs on the banner of Himalmedia.
The Dixit brothers, who also claim themselves the leaders of civil society, have sowed a seed of dispute between Dr. Devendra Raj Pandey and Krishna Pahadi. It is due to their ill act, Pandey has to cut off relation with Pahadi.
Himal South Asia has also become a breeding ground for them to launch sordid acts of gaining advantage illegally.
Himalmedia at present:
Ever since the inception of the company, employees have been working permanently at Himalmedia. However, suddenly Dixit brothers introduced new system and made staffers work on contract. This gave them a ground to treat workers as servants and lead a life of landlords. On numerous occasions, they sacked workers and hired new ones.
Without serving their interest, no worker could be their employee. Evident is the case of editors. No editor was employed for more than a year. However, Rajendra Dahal's case was exceptional. This is because Dahal was their family brother-in-law, so he was able to work for more than a year.
Time-bound salary and facility were a far cry for workers. Those staffers, recruited on 5000-7000 salary per month five years ago are still drawing the same scale. Repeated pleas of workers to hike salary and facility fell on the Dixit brothers' deaf ears. In this way, fours years went down the drain.
Irked workers, hoping for bright fate, established a non-political union for their welfare. However, the Dixit brothers shattered their dreams when they refused to meet them recently after the union was established. The workers got a shot in the arms after Ashutosh Tiwari, who was later nominated as the Chief Executive Officer, pledged to fulfill their genuine demands. He assured to act on the commitment with in a month.
However, even though a year passed, the demands were gathering dust. Worst, the Dixit brothers did not even hand over the permanent letters to working journalists and other staffs. This proves that the Dixit brothers always cultivate false promises.
Media Workers' Alliance
Baneshwor, Kathmandu, Nepal
mediaworkeralliance@gmail.com

The news on Himalmedia published on various newspapers:
"We will close the company if we were to add facility to workers and made their status permanent."
 Saghu weekly, Shrawan 20, 2065

Resignation of 16 journalists and employees sought on the ground of Rs 10 million losses. Threatened to publish names with photos if failed to put in papers.
 Saghu weekly, Bhadra 2, 2065

35 employees ousted ahead of Dashain.
 Saghu weekly Bhadra 9, 2065

Trade unions flay Himalmedia's unilateral act to sack employees flouting the Working Journalists' Act
 Janaastha weekly, Bhadra 18, 2065

Maoist union declares to interfere in Himalmedia against the management's act of ousting workers violating the Working Journalists' Act and Labour Act.
 Saghu weekly, Aswoj 13, 2065

Himal Khabarpatrika Editor is going to be sacked after Kanak Mani Dixit's seat in the Constituent Assembly from the CPN-UML was not guaranteed
 Saghu weekly, Aswoj 6, 2065

Sacking workers by Himalmedia ahead of Dashain agitates trade unions, demand immediate reinstatement
 Gorkhapara daily, Aswoj 18, 2065

Federation of Nepali Journalists flays the Himalmedia management's act of torturing journalists and employees. FJN General Secretary Poshan KC demanded the government punish the management if failed to act as per the Working Journalists' Act
 Janadisha daily, Aswoj 15, 2065

Trade unions, civil society, rights activists urge Himalmedia not to sack 16 workers, working at its customers section
 Naya Bimarsha weekly, Kartik 8, 2065

Himalmedia announces vacancy immediately after sacking three dozen employees on loss ground.
 Saghu weekly, Kartik 11, 2065

The Information Department directs Himalmedia to reinstate the sacked employees and issues a show case notice for announcing fresh recruitments
 Saghu weekly, Kartik 25, 2065

Government summons Himalmedia to prove whether the company is at loss
 Budhabar weekly, Kartik 27, 2065

Government directs Himalmedia management to present before the Information Department along with its audit report
 Roadmap weekly, Kartik 28, 2065
Himalmedia is trying to present fake audit report after the government summoned its management
 Sambodhan / Naya Bimarsha weekly, Kartik 29, 2065

The Labour and Information departments put stamp on decision of civil society leaders Kanak Mani Dixit and Kunda Dixit to sack employees flouting the Working Journalists' Act and Labour Act
 Dishanirdesh weekly, Mangsir 1, 2065'

Trade union flays act of torching Himal Khabarpatrika copies, slams management's act of accusing the union workers of their involvement in the incident, urges media not to publish such fake news
 Kantipur daily, Mangsir 4, 2065

The so-called Himalmedia's claim that its copies were torched by masked men is doubtful. The management claimed that 5,000 copies were burnt down, however only 1,000 copies were found torched.
• Budhabar weekly, Mangsir 11, 2065

Our concern has been drawn towards the Himalmedia's claim that the sacked employees had torched its copies. The rigidness of Kanak Mani Dixit and Kunda Dixit over the formation of union in the company has also raised our concern. All can exercise the constitutional-guaranteed right to open and run trade union. So they are merely trying to violate press freedom by themselves.
• Janadharana weekly, Mangsir 12, 2065

Employees at Himalmedia are trying to open a union. However, the management is learnt to have trying its every bit to crush their attempt.
• The Himalayan Times daily, November 28, 2008

The Media Marketing Association has flayed the Himalmedia's act of sacking its two staffers without any reason.
• Kantipur daily, Mangsir 15, 2065

The Information has directed the Himalmedia management to reinstate the sacked 16 employees in its sales department.
• The notice sent by the Information Department to Himalmedia management on Mangsir 16, 2065

According to a reliable source, the following organizations were found assisting Himalmedia directly or indirectly in various ways.
They are follows:

1. Action Aid Nepal
2. Action Contre laFaim (Campaign Against Hungers)
3. ADRA/Nepal
4. APEIRON
5. Association of Volunteers Without Frontiers/AVSF
6. BNMT
7. CARE Nepal
8. CECI
9. CEDPA
10. Centro Cooperation Sviluppo/CCS
11. Child Protection Centers and Services/CPCS
12. Child Welfare Scheme
13. Child Fund Japan
14. CONCERN WORLDWIDE
15. Danish Forestry Extension C/o Nepal Agro forestry Foundation
16. Eco Himal
17. Educate The Children
18. Family Health International (FHI)
19. Fida International
20. German Nepalese Help Association
21. Group for Trans cultural/GRT
22. Habitat for Humanity International
23. HANDICAP International
24. Heifer Project International
25. Helen Keller International
26. Helvetas Nepal
27. International Alert
28. International Development Enterprise/ Nepal
29. International Nepal Fellowship
30. International Rescue Committee Nepal
31. Interplast Germany
32. Kinderhaus Kathamndu /KIKA
33. Leprosy Mission Nepal
34. LWF Nepal
35. Mercy Corps
36. Micronutrient Initiative, C/o - Canadian Cooperation Office
37. MS. Nepal
38. National Democratic Institute/NDI
39. Nepal Leprosy Trust
40. Netherlands Leprosy
41. OXFAM GB
42. SDC
43. Panos South Asia
44. Plan Nepal
45. Planete Enfants Nepal
46. Population Services International
47. PRACTICAL ACTION Nepal
48. Room to Read
49. Rural Education And Development (READ)
50. Save the Children Japan
51. Save the Children Norway
52. Save the Children US
53. Shapla Neer
54. SNV Nepal
55. South Asia Partnership International
56. SPW Nepal
57. Terre des Hommes
58. The Asia Foundation
59. The Daywalka Foundation
60. The Mountain Institute
61. United Mission to Nepal
62. USC – Nepal
63. VSO Nepal
64. WaterAid
65. World Education
66. World Neighbors
67. World Vision International
68. World Wildlife Fund
69. Win rock International
70. OTI-Nepal
71. Antenna Foundation-Nepal
72. IUCN
73. ODC
74. DFID
75. WTLCP
76. BSP
77. ESAP
78. NSET
79. Blue Diamond Society
80. LFP
81. IID
82. ESAP
83. BSP Nepal
84. RRN
85. Samjhauta Nepal
86. SDC
87. Plan Nepal
88. EU
89. Kathmandu Valley Water Management Support Project
90. Umbrella Project Support Unit
91. Pratical Action
92. Care Nepal
93. United Mission to Nepal
94. United Nation Children's fund
95. Fitness Center
96. Self awakening Center
97. Himalayan Light Foundation
98. LFP
99. F-Skill
100. NRN Division Non Resident Nepali Association
101. Samjhauta Nepal
102. Swati
103. UNDP
104. ARD Inc.
105. Tfe Project
106. Neve
107. NSET
108. J&T
109. RAP
110. ABC Nepal
111. Action Aid Nepal
112. AMDA Nepal
113. AusAID
114. Blue Diamond Society
115. BP Memorial Health Foundation
116. Britain Nepal Medical Trust(BNMT), Biratnagar
117. CAC Nepal
118. Care Nepal
119. CEDPA Nepal
120. CRDS Nepal
121. DFID
122. Family Health International-Nepal
123. Family Planning Association of Nepal
124. FLWD
125. General Welfare Pratisthan (GWP)
126. Health Sector Support Program (HSSP)
127. Himalayan Social Welfare Organization
128. Hope Foundation Nepal
129. ICA Nepal
130. International Labour Organization (ILO)
131. JICA
132. Maintaining Resource Management Group(MRMG)
133. Maiti Nepal
134. National Center for Aids & STD Control
135. Nava kiran Plus
136. Nepal CRS Company
137. Nepal Family Health Program
138. Nepal Fertility care Center (NFCC)
139. Nepal Harm Reduction Council
140. Nepal Red Cross Society- AIDS Prev. Program
141. Pact Nepal
142. Population Services International- Nepal
143. RECPHEC
144. RHI-Umbrella Project
145. Richmond Fellowship
146. SACTS
147. SAD Nepal, Jhapa
148. Sagarmatha Health Foundation
149. Save the Children, Norway/UK
150. Save the Children, US
151. SDC
152. SOLID Nepal
153. UNAIDS
154. UNDP
155. UNFPA
156. UNICEF
157. USAID
158. Valley Research Group
159. VSO
160. WATCH
161. WHO
162. WOREC
163. World Vision International Nepal
164. PANOS SOUTH ASIA
165. Marie Stopes
166. Policy Group, Bhojraj, Kupondole
167. IPPF
168. Vikon
169. KS
170. Lily
171. Moods Condom
172. Plan International Nepal
173. GTZ (Health)
174. Lutheran World Federation
175. FEDO

Indian police gang rape two Nepali women

2008-11-01T16:34:00.000+05:45

Policemen in Indian state of Uttar Pradesh (UP) gang-raped two of the six Nepali women taken into custody from Gorakhpur railway station last Tuesday evening, the Kathmandu Post reported Saturday. The women were on their way to New Delhi from where they hoped to fly to a Gulf country for employment.
According to the report, five UP policemen took the women, who had reached Gorakhpur via Sunauli border town together with two Nepali youths, to Mallika Hotel situated near the station for 'interrogation' and later raped them.
Inspector General of Police in Gorakhpur area Harish Chandra Kasyap told the Post that the two guilty policemen have been suspended and action has been initiated against them. He said action will be taken against three other policemen involved in the case.
The Post also quoted M.P Sharma of Nepali Janadhikar Security Committee that the policemen had threatened to kill anyone who would dare to make public the incident and also demanded Rs 30,000 for the release of the women.
The Indian embassy in Kathmandu is paying all the journalists not to write news against Indian hegemony. However, some news are printed in the Nepali media nowadays.
Still they have set up a newspaper called The Himalayan Times to identify and manipulate the Nepali journalists. This newspapers primary goal is to identify the anti-Indian journalists and bribe them. Not only that the newspaper sends gifts to all the police officials and government officials on every occasion. Everyone who knows this newspaper knows that its a RAW propoganda machine set up to spy over Nepali bureaucrats and security officials.

Some masala

2008-10-13T11:43:00.003+05:45

1. Again India did the trick. It provided buses for the Constituent Assembly Members. But why is not paying the Koshi victims and other Nepalese. And interested on providing bus to the constituent assembly members and the Maoist government has accepted happily. That proves Prachanda and company are the Indian stooge and they were used by India to disintegrate the Nepal.
Shame on You Prachand and Baburam. What will the dead Maoists will say if they can speak?

2. The Indian embassy is said to be behind the break up of Binod Gyawali and Narayan Wagle-Prateek Pradhan newspaper venture. Now they are bringing separate english and Nepali newpapers. Embassy ordered Gyawali to have Yubraj Ghimire instead of Narayan and Prateek.

3. The Himalayan Times is doing a survey secretly either to close the newspaper or not because the mission of RAW is complete and they are successful in disnitegrating Nepalese minds and hearts and separating Nepal into various caste and ethnicity like Madheshis and pahades, which was not heard before this RAW propaganda machine started in Nepal.

4. The Himalaya Times has a new editor whose name is Dhruv Painly but publicly it is said that Ajaya Khanal is editor and there is a fight over the power and supremacy, who controls the newspapers. Some even call it RAW and CIA fight. But who is RAW and who is CIA the staff are confused.

Koshi havoc carelessness of India and its attitude towards Nepal

2008-08-22T23:59:00.000+05:45

India has not paid Gandak victims its not a news anymore.
As India's attitude towards Nepal has created another graver casualty Koshi Flood. More than 50,0000 pople lost their land and house and property and over hundred died and are still missing thanks to India.
India is great murderer, its yet another proof.
Today, a team inspecte the flooded area and concluded that its has happened due to India's carelessness and dadagiri attitude to Nepal and Nepalese. According to the treaty its India's responsibility to maintain the barrage but India is busy providing ambulances to collect the dead bodies. Its Indian favourite hobby to give ambulances as it loves the dead ones.
India fears Nepal because this tiny nationa can be a challenge to it tomorrow, if it is left alone to operate by itself. Thus, India has APCA and all other spy agencies working in Nepal for the information collection and demoralizing Nepalese.
Otherwise why Nepal One and UTL staff are on strike for months and Indian embassy is busy forcing Prachanda not to go to China.
Madarchodoo....shambhaljaoooo.....down with expansionist India and its grand designs.

2008-08-17T09:42:00.001+05:45

On the occasion of the 62nd Independence Day of India, the Indian Government donated properties worth Rs 3 million to hospitals, organisations and academic institutions in the country on Friday.

But has it paid the compensation to Gandal Victims
NO

India granted about 30 ambulances, 8 buses, books and other study material to various Nepali organisations today. Why has it

Indian Ambassador to Nepal, Rakesh Sood handed over the vehicles and the supplies to the concerned bodies this morning during a function held at the Indian Embassy in the capital.

Meanwhile, Consul General T Ashok handed over ambulances and buses to half dozens of hospitals and schools in Birgunj.

Sood is not paying Gandak victims and not helping Nepal One

2008-08-16T20:42:00.000+05:45

Sood is not paying Gandak victims and not helping Nepal One.

But On the occasion of the 62nd Independence Day of India, the Indian Government donated properties worth Rs 3 million to hospitals, organisations and academic institutions in the country on Friday.

But has it paid the compensation to Gandal Victims?
NO. And it never pays also because its the country of frauds.

India granted about 30 ambulances, 8 buses, books and other study material to various Nepali organisations today.
Why does it give ambulances because its also pays the terai outfit to kill so to ferry dead bodies Nepal needs ambulances. Its a guilty concience of Indian authority that they helped terai output to kill so many Npalese.

Indian Ambassador to Nepal, Rakesh Sood handed over the vehicles and the supplies to the concerned bodies this morning during a function held at the Indian Embassy in the capital.
But the news doesnot says how many scholarships it gave to the sons and daughters of ministers and secretaries and police officers to bribe them.

Meanwhile, Consul General T Ashok handed over ambulances and buses to half dozens of hospitals and schools in Birgunj.
Mr Ashok also distributed cash and always distributes cash to the suspicious people in Birgunj top create disturbances and destroy the infrastures in Nepali side in Birgunj. It is the sole investor of Madhesh Janadhikar Forum.

Another interesting matter is that Sood said he can do nothing to nepal One's jourbnalists. Why is he here in Nepal Then ? What can he do? Do we need Indian embassy in Kathmandu?
One of the journalist of Nepal One said: Sood and Indian Embassy is not necessary because every operation in Nepal is carried out by APCA and its publications Annapurna Post and The Himalayan Times.
It is expansionist India's new enbassy run by South Block.

Tharus and Madhesi: Who are from Terai

2008-06-29T11:44:00.000+05:45

Tharu community takes to streets to protest Madhesi demand. The Nepali media that is run by the Indian embassy in lainchor is not giving enough space to their news but to make their masters happy blow the madhesi news.
What is madhes and whose is madhes?

Tharu community staged a demonstration in the capital on Saturday aganist the demand for a single state to the entire southern plains laid out by Terai-based parties at the parliament.

The Tharu community took out the protest, saying that the political bickering fuelled by the Indian embassy and its stooges at the parliament to make the Terai region one state has put the glory of the land, where the Tharu community have been living for thousands of years and shed sweat or blood, in dire situation.

The agitating Tharu community also warned that the decision to allow the migrant Madhesi community to rule and oppress the indigenous community of Terai ( Tharu Community) would invite a calamity.

The Tharu community demanded that the attempt to convert all the people living in the Terai region Madhesis by ending the diversity of various religion, culture, language and communal be stopped at the earliest.

They also warned to launch a strong protest in the 24 Tarai districts from now on if the attempt was not halted.

The Terai-based parties have been obstructing Constituent Assembly proceedings to press their demands to declare the entire Terai region as a single state, why and for whom? What about Tharus who are living for centyries and those who migrated from Bihar 10 years ago are claiming the land The Terai and want madhesh supported by the anti-national foreigners and nepali elements.